+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39
IT News Thread, Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement in Other News; All sounds a bit thick to me, EU: You know that solution that works well for you and you have ...
  1. #31

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,271
    Thank Post
    884
    Thanked 2,749 Times in 2,322 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    785
    All sounds a bit thick to me,
    EU: You know that solution that works well for you and you have invested time and money into training and development with.
    Citizens: Yeap Windows right?
    EU: Yea thats the one, by the way you can't buy it anymore and you'll have to spend untold time and money to swap because we say so.
    Citizens: Seriously, that will kill of some businesses on switchover costs alone as we have to redevelop our products and pay our Tech staff in actual money unlike the education sector. What is this going to do to the economy, what about those businesses and organizations that will have to waste a huge portion of their budget to comply.
    EU: Oh you mean you guys, the citizens, yea. As it happens we don't really care about you, just our overly showy moral standpoint.

    The problem I think is that it has become a self fueling fire, the EU wants to display its power by winning against MS (which the US couldn't even really do) and MS are just looking at the unreasonable demands and wondering how insane they are going to get.

    I do agree that MS needed a good kick in the right direction but the EU is just going nuts trying to exert and prove their influence against the big bad successful business.

  2. #32

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,530
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,648 Times in 2,049 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    925
    The procurement rules are not for businesses. They are for member governments who put things out to tender.

  3. #33

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,271
    Thank Post
    884
    Thanked 2,749 Times in 2,322 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    The procurement rules are not for businesses. They are for member governments who put things out to tender.
    Yea but it limits what the companies can tender with, for example a large scale bit of software or training program type of thing that is designed to include MS products. All of these places will need to retool to handle government stuff. That and you may end up with two distinct pools of solutions, one for government and one for businesses. It would depend on how low the costs and how high the interoperability would be on the government type options and their quality as to whether this would be taken on by business.

  4. #34

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,422
    Thank Post
    645
    Thanked 967 Times in 667 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by GrumbleDook View Post
    Should it come round in 10 years time that we are mainly on EduBuntu or using karoshi will we see the same attitude from the EU?
    If Edubuntu or Karoshi ever use closed standards designed to prevent interoperability with third parties and abuse their monopoly, then yes, probably.

    However, I don't think that is very likely.

  5. #35

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    10,074
    Thank Post
    1,384
    Thanked 1,890 Times in 1,170 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    614
    As previously mentioned, MS do not directly respond to invitations to tender as they would get caught in wrangling about this. Instead companies tender using MS solutions. For the EU to stop the inclusion of particular technology in an invitation to tender coming out of government body of a member state would break their own procurement rules.

  6. #36
    Shwaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    14
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    Exactly, and if look at this, it is talking about Microsoft the company, not its software. From what I read of this, it is not saying that Microsoft software cannot be used, just that the company itself cannot be directly involved with any public procurements. There is nothing in this that is stopping, say, Capita from providing a solution that happens to use Microsoft products.

    Anyway, it's too early to tell what will happen as after all, all that has happened so far is that one MEP has asked a question.

    BTW, I wouldn't start calling it a witch hunt until the EU starts pulling MS up on odd obscure stuff that it lets other similarly sized companies get away with.

  7. #37

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,530
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,648 Times in 2,049 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    925
    Quote Originally Posted by SYNACK View Post
    Yea but it limits what the companies can tender with, for example a large scale bit of software or training program type of thing that is designed to include MS products. All of these places will need to retool to handle government stuff. That and you may end up with two distinct pools of solutions, one for government and one for businesses. It would depend on how low the costs and how high the interoperability would be on the government type options and their quality as to whether this would be taken on by business.
    Ah, but wouldn't this force Microsoft to be more open about it's interoperability? If it's customers couldn't do business with governments, they would have to change to non-MS stuff. This would mean huge losses in income.

  8. #38
    cookie_monster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Derbyshire
    Posts
    4,224
    Thank Post
    396
    Thanked 278 Times in 239 Posts
    Rep Power
    75
    @ SYNACK

    Hahaha this subject aside you're absolutly right about that but that's the E.U. for you, it should be great but it's a shambles due to (you guessed) the twin pillars of corruption and greed.

  9. #39

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,271
    Thank Post
    884
    Thanked 2,749 Times in 2,322 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    785
    Yea, I have to admit to the common slashdot crime of skimming a little too quickly over the source material. My bad. I do still think that the EUs overall dealings with the MS are getting OTT and I am glad to hear that others think this as well.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. OPEN - e-procurement service for schools
    By beeswax in forum Budgets and Expenditure
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st March 2008, 07:31 PM
  2. Ranger - Asks for a driver every time a user logs on
    By FN-GM in forum Network and Classroom Management
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 8th December 2007, 03:41 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 13th October 2007, 02:05 PM
  4. Welcome to member 900
    By GrumbleDook in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25th May 2006, 02:56 PM
  5. Public Windows Vista Newsgroups Online at Microsoft
    By tosca925 in forum Windows Vista
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd February 2006, 08:38 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •