+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 80
IT News Thread, Put young children on DNA list, urge police in Other News; As if I didn't have enough to do already... Primary school children should be eligible for the DNA database if ...
  1. #1

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,850
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 598 Times in 514 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    227

    Put young children on DNA list, urge police

    As if I didn't have enough to do already...

    Primary school children should be eligible for the DNA database if they exhibit behaviour indicating they may become criminals in later life, according to Britain's most senior police forensics expert.

    Gary Pugh, director of forensic sciences at Scotland Yard and the new DNA spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said a debate was needed on how far Britain should go in identifying potential offenders, given that some experts believe it is possible to identify future offending traits in children as young as five.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/20...stice.children

  2. #2

    Joanne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    2,159
    Thank Post
    234
    Thanked 276 Times in 217 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17
    Rep Power
    122
    ah yes, my nabaztag rudely read this out very loud last night as I was trying to get to sleep.

    I think it's a good thing... teach the little B@5t@rd$!!!

    heheh....

  3. #3
    contink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    3,791
    Thank Post
    303
    Thanked 327 Times in 233 Posts
    Rep Power
    119
    Good grief... why don't they just do DNA swabs on birth of everyone for pete's sake.

    I wouldn't be so anti-DNA database storage if it weren't for the fact that it involves the government, computers and the usual plethora of idiots trying to run/abuse both. Show me a secure database system that cannot be hacked, abused and is completely fool proof from all stages including data entry to searches and I'll happily provide my DNA, along with proof that pigs fly in formation. Give me strength...

    Irony? what irony?

  4. #4
    budgester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Enfield, Middlesex
    Posts
    486
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    25
    And lets also get em all RFID implated at the same time.

    Has anyone been watching Last Enemy, for a good perspective on the whole information database stuff.

  5. #5
    StewartKnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,587
    Thank Post
    2
    Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Is Linux packaged with Doom.... I hadn't noticed if it is!

  6. #6

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,850
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 598 Times in 514 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by StewartKnight View Post
    Is Linux packaged with Doom.... I hadn't noticed if it is!
    Code:
    apt-get install lxdoom

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Put young children on DNA list, urge police

    Hi,
    I check this site as you given. This is very Awesome information about young children on DNA.

  8. #8

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,374
    Thank Post
    906
    Thanked 1,811 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    468
    If they could keep the data safe, I would agree with taking everyone’s DNA. If you have got nothing to hide what will be the problem? It will reduce time in catching criminals such as Soham murders. The police will catch more people who commit crime thus making our country a safer place. It could even possibly reduce crime, people may think again.

  9. #9

    Andrew_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Winchester
    Posts
    3,138
    Thank Post
    65
    Thanked 424 Times in 319 Posts
    Rep Power
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by FN-Greatermanchester View Post
    If they could keep the data safe, I would agree with taking everyone’s DNA. If you have got nothing to hide what will be the problem?
    Sort of... But what happens when having a genetic predisposition to green eyes becomes an offence? Or being of Jewish/Muslim/French descent?

    Couldn't happen again? Yugoslavia or Rwanda recent enough for you?
    Last edited by Andrew_C; 5th April 2008 at 05:24 PM. Reason: typo

  10. #10


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    4,706
    Thank Post
    354
    Thanked 807 Times in 722 Posts
    Rep Power
    348
    Given the government can't look after a couple of CDs, I'd hate to think what they could do with my DNA.

  11. #11

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,374
    Thank Post
    906
    Thanked 1,811 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    468
    Yes i know what you mean, thats why i said if they could keep them safe. What was the outcome of that?

  12. #12
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,928
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by FN-Greatermanchester View Post
    If they could keep the data safe, I would agree with taking everyone’s DNA. If you have got nothing to hide what will be the problem? It will reduce time in catching criminals such as Soham murders. The police will catch more people who commit crime thus making our country a safer place. It could even possibly reduce crime, people may think again.
    Sounds like Jacqui Smith has assumed you're online identity...

    The whole argument about having nothing do hide doesn't hold up under scrutiny - plenty of cases of innocent people being implicated in a crime based on dna record mixups. Don't forget our police force are very busy in populating the dna database. We have a very high percentage of the population on the database. 1 out of 20 people is already on the dbase compared to 1 out of 200 in the US.

    It's an issue of looking at the organizations in charge and they're record on infringing on our personal freedoms in the name of security and solving crimes.

    Don't forget a lot of these police officials support crackpot ideas like national id cards, extension of the current 28 days detension for questioning of terror suspects when neither is necessary. Same with compulsary dna swabs.

    They should actually focus on sharing information between regional police forces, and the failure to provide the necessary information to the relevant agencies, which were exposed following the soham murderers.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kendal
    Posts
    1,556
    Thank Post
    112
    Thanked 178 Times in 145 Posts
    Rep Power
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by torledo View Post
    Sounds like Jacqui Smith has assumed you're online identity...

    The whole argument about having nothing do hide doesn't hold up under scrutiny - plenty of cases of innocent people being implicated in a crime based on dna record mixups.

    Don't forget a lot of these police officials support crackpot ideas like national id cards, extension of the current 28 days detension for questioning of terror suspects when neither is necessary. Same with compulsary dna swabs.
    Yes and plenty of innocent people convicted before DNA so what does it matter?

    As for ID cards - so what if you had to carry one - makes no difference except to criminals.

    The "personal freedoms" I'd like to see are things like being able to walk down the street unaccosted, the right to park my car without it getting nicked/vandalised etc, the right to not get burgled - anything the police can do to help with this would be good - if having a dna database helps them catch criminals quicker so be it. I'm with Zak on this - it's only a problem if you have something to hide!
    Last edited by jcollings; 5th April 2008 at 05:52 PM.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Kendal
    Posts
    1,556
    Thank Post
    112
    Thanked 178 Times in 145 Posts
    Rep Power
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_C View Post
    Sort of... But what happens when having a genetic predisposition to green eyes becomes an offence? Or being of Jewish/Muslim/French descent?

    Couldn't happen again? Yugoslavia or Rwanda recent enough for you?
    That could happen with or without DNA databses!

  15. #15

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,529
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,648 Times in 2,049 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    925
    Quote Originally Posted by jcollings View Post
    That could happen with or without DNA databses!
    But why give them another tool to abuse?



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Very Young Edugeekers
    By witch in forum Comments and Suggestions
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 17th December 2007, 02:54 PM
  2. Do it for the children
    By alexknight in forum Other Stuff
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd May 2007, 09:42 AM
  3. Police and Justice Bill 2006
    By Geoff in forum School ICT Policies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th November 2006, 09:04 AM
  4. Changes to the Police and Justice Bill
    By Geoff in forum School ICT Policies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 1st February 2006, 01:47 PM
  5. Why do the good die young?!
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th August 2005, 09:18 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •