I have recently been told by a supplier that stacking switches using a backplane is old-hat and that the current practice is to stack using the Gig uplinks.
Is this true, and if you were installing a new network which would you choose?
I have recently been told by a supplier that stacking switches using a backplane is old-hat and that the current practice is to stack using the Gig uplinks.
Is this true, and if you were installing a new network which would you choose?

I know that the HP 2650's only have gig and mini gbic ports for this.
Ben
Here's a whitepaper on how HP Procurves do it:
http://www.hp.com/rnd/pdfs/Stacking_White_Paper.pdf
Pratically though, what I have here is a mix. Some switches are stacked using GigE or fibre. However, several of the 3com units are stacked using 3coms proprietary backplane system.

Thanks for that Geoff nice to read and simple too.
Ben
switch fabric 8)

It depends on the switches you have really. For example D-Link are moving away from the old 'chasis' type switch and favouring their Xstack style of product - these use a proprietory backplane.
Personally, I use HP 2650's with fibre uplinks to the core switch and the switches are stacked for easy management.
The question that is important is 'do I need super speedy backplane speeds or will standard uplinks to a core be suitable'. Everyone has different requirements.
all my 3com switches are stacked, can some one explain to me what the term 'backplane' means?

Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backplane, it doesn't specifically mention networking but it covers it in general.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)