Networks Thread, Group policy etc in Technical; A quick thanks to a very useful bunch of people, been reading for a while and it seems that i ...
-
3rd November 2006, 07:08 PM #1
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
3rd November 2006, 07:14 PM #2 Re: Group policy etc
Go to the microsoft site and download dcdiag and netdiag and run them both and see if they bring up anything.
-
-
3rd November 2006, 07:28 PM #3
- Rep Power
- 12
Re: Group policy etc
Very quick thank you ChrisH, have downloaded both now i will wait...till Monday. I actually stated the problem started with the server(W2k3) i meant to say it started after the summer when i upgraded all the clients to XP Sp2 from 2000. I deleted the old profiles, i was using mandatory for the pupils but have not been able to get that to work either since.
Cheers again
-
-
3rd November 2006, 07:56 PM #4
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Group policy etc
Ah manadatory profiles ....
I suspect that the permisions of the mandatory profile weren't changed to allow changes in the student context. GPOs operate by making registry changes on the user hive (ntuser.man). If this is still set to only give administrators or the user it was copied from full control then that might cause problems.
-
-
3rd November 2006, 08:49 PM #5 Re: Group policy etc
Install this on your server, use it to enable 'full logging' on the problem PCs, logon on to a PC with a problem account then use the log analysis feature to find out excatly what is going on.
-
-
4th November 2006, 11:26 AM #6
- Rep Power
- 12
Re: Group policy etc
Cheers again, i had the security on the profile folder set as instructed by an MS walktrough(create a user MPM, copy locally ect) but will check again. Have downloaded the suggested program will try and see what shows up on what looks to be a very busy Monday(like there is any other sort!)
-
-
6th November 2006, 02:53 PM #7
- Rep Power
- 12
Re: Group policy etc
Monday..How nasty? Anyway i ran Netdiag and came up with errors(no surprise there)
-Default Gateway Test (fail) no gateway reachable for this adapter
-DNS test - (fail) FATAL dns registration for " " is incorrect on all DNS servers
Not completely sure what caused this, i have been told today that one of the (i didn't know there were two) network cards was disabled by EDIT last week.
The servers IP address' are correct, however i can not ping the stated IP for the Gateway??
All other tested items (netdiag) are passed.
Having not too much joy at the moment, help please
-
-
6th November 2006, 03:08 PM #8 Re: Group policy etc
The gateway test will fail if:
a) the gateway IP is unpingable (firewalled) this is a reasonable configuration for your border router/firewall and you shouldn't worry about it.
b) you didn't set a gateway IP.
Primary DNS should point to another AD DNS server. Secondary DNS should point to localhost. (Assuming you have 2 DCs).
-
-
6th November 2006, 05:03 PM #9 Re: Group policy etc
I disagree with Geoff, the primary DNS should point to itself if it is an AD DNS server.
Check the DNS records for the DC, if the server has two NIC's and one has been disabled this could cause serious issues with DNS
-
-
6th November 2006, 07:12 PM #10
- Rep Power
- 12
Re: Group policy etc
Okay getting just a little confused right about now
The W2K3 server has one NIC. It can not resolve the stated 'gateway', GPM says network path not found. File replication is showing errors relating to the in ability to resolve the share(it explains the possible causes and suggests forcing a stop/start of ntfrs) Which due to the fact it can't reach the other server is obvious.
The W2K server has two NIC's a 10/100 and a 1000. The 10/100 has been disabled. The event log for this machine is altogether more relaxed and has more warnings than anything else suggesting that it can't contact the other server but will try again later(if it feels like it?) AD and GP both work as 'normal' except for the fact its obviously not right. The significant error is that shown from netdiag : no gateway!
Having neither set the servers up or having paid that much attention in the past(or being responsible for them) this is a new one on me. cheers for the help
-
-
6th November 2006, 07:41 PM #11 Re: Group policy etc

Originally Posted by
djm968 I disagree with Geoff, the primary DNS should point to itself if it is an AD DNS server.
Check the DNS records for the DC, if the server has two NIC's and one has been disabled this could cause serious issues with DNS
Yeah- Primary DNS Server (if it is an AD Server) should indeed point to itself.
Paul
-
-
6th November 2006, 08:38 PM #12 Re: Group policy etc
I disagree with Geoff, the primary DNS should point to itself if it is an AD DNS server.
While this will work, it'll also fill your event logs up on the DC with lots of errors complaining about the netlogin service not being able to find the SRV records. This is because the netlogin service starts before the DNS service does. In extreme cases you will actually start to see replication delays or even failures.
It's all explained in this KB article.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825036
'Domain controller with DNS installed' is the relevant section. As I explained above, I'm advocating the third method.
-
-
6th November 2006, 08:48 PM #13 Re: Group policy etc
I think Geoff what may have prompted the query about your point was your emphatic "..should point". This is only a third option in a list of three possible (and workable) methods of installing DNS on an AD network- as detailed on the KB article you linked to.
I have installed dozens of servers with DNS on them using the primary DC with DNS installed as the primary DNS reference- as per most training materials (even MS Press) and never had my event log even hint at SRV records not being found (even that can be remedied). Im sure it probably happens, but I have never seen it.
Good link though- thanks.
-
-
6th November 2006, 09:18 PM #14 Re: Group policy etc
I'm another one in favour of pointing the DNS to itself .. and secondary pointing to the other DC.
We do get the odd error but that tends to point at other issues ... and they can be helpful in resolving issues.
Then again, I would recommend DNS & BIND and DNS on Windows Server 2003 to most people though ... and they do talk about the option of alternate pointing for DNS ...
-
-
6th November 2006, 11:40 PM #15 Re: Group policy etc
the gateway IP is unpingable (firewalled) this is a reasonable configuration for your border router/firewall
It's no big deal, but I think a pingable gateway is better. If a Windows box with an unexpired lease starts up and can't find your DHCP server, it will ping the gateway. If it gets a reply it carries on using that lease, if it doesn't get a reply it uses APIPA.
If it does go to APIPA it then checks for the DHCP every few mins so everything will recover shortly after you've fixed a DHCP outage, but users are much less likely to notice when your gateway is pingable.
[This is useful for renumbering in a mostly DHCP environment]
Edit/PS: I remember that Net Logon & DNS thing at startup, but haven't seen it for a while.. is it something that stopped happening with 2K3?
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By pedster666 in forum Hardware
Replies: 5
Last Post: 27th February 2008, 11:03 AM
-
By krisd32 in forum Windows
Replies: 5
Last Post: 31st August 2007, 09:07 AM
-
By kevin_lane in forum How do you do....it?
Replies: 2
Last Post: 27th July 2007, 12:17 PM
-
By faza in forum Networks
Replies: 27
Last Post: 5th July 2006, 06:34 AM
-
By faza in forum Networks
Replies: 2
Last Post: 23rd May 2006, 07:30 AM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules