+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 191
Netbooks, PDA and Phones Thread, Microsoft Surface in Technical; I think that even with their massive advertising budget and concerted efforts to take over from the iPad, they might ...
  1. #31

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,652
    Thank Post
    516
    Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,891 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    831
    I think that even with their massive advertising budget and concerted efforts to take over from the iPad, they might still struggle.

    People see Apple as the Ferrari of the computing and phone world. They see Microsoft as the VW. So, if they have a choice of a 349 VW or a 399 Ferrari, which do you reckon they'd go for?

    If I had been running it, I'd've been pushing it as a loss-leader, like they did with the Xbox. MS would make the money back on apps.

  2. #32
    Quackers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,310
    Thank Post
    40
    Thanked 141 Times in 116 Posts
    Rep Power
    53
    The Pro version is mildly appealing, mainly for running PARS or SIMS on. But this RT version i really do not get it, its got that vile Windows Metro interface with the headache of not being able to run any of my Windows programs, may as well use an ipad iOS has a nicer interface. At least with the Pro for a few specific tasks i think i can refrain from stamping on the tablet as Metro drives me round the bend with its bad design, but guessing the Pro will be priced at a level we do not want to pay.

  3. #33

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,652
    Thank Post
    516
    Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,891 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by Quackers View Post
    The Pro version is mildly appealing, mainly for running PARS or SIMS on. But this RT version i really do not get it, its got that vile Windows Metro interface with the headache of not being able to run any of my Windows programs, may as well use an ipad iOS has a nicer interface. At least with the Pro for a few specific tasks i think i can refrain from stamping on the tablet as Metro drives me round the bend with its bad design, but guessing the Pro will be priced at a level we do not want to pay.
    I dunno, most people who have used the Metro interface on a touchscreen device come back saying the same thing - it is a very nice interface on that medium. The iPad interface is *horrible* in my opinion, it annoys me so much, so often when I have to do anything on the few we have here.

    On a tablet, in general, use of traditional Windows applications is going to be somewhat limited even if you have x86 chips - as the interfaces are not designed for big flabby fingers...

    So, on a design basis, the tablets have a very good chance. On a price basis, they've shot themselves in the foot.

  4. Thanks to localzuk from:

    SYNACK (18th October 2012)

  5. #34
    flyinghaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    994
    Thank Post
    99
    Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts
    Rep Power
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by Theblacksheep View Post
    My laptop is full hd on a 13" screen (vaioz21) and its too much, need to adjust OS to 125% to actually see things properly. High resolution is nice but needless in some cases, especially on an even smaller screen. Other devices get away with it by doubling the scale, a bit pointless.
    You're right. The font scaling was a real problem on Windows 7 (and even worse on previous versions) but AFAIK Windows8 scales everything in the 'metro/modern' UI by default so presumably it wouldn't be an issue. The only time you might encounter problems is when running legacy desktop software but the RT version doesn't even support this so it's a non-issue!

    Admittedly it's not the end of the world but put up against the displays in the ipad3 (2000x1500) and the slew of 1080p android devices that are hitting the market it relegates MS's surface instantly into 3rd place in the display department.
    Last edited by flyinghaggis; 17th October 2012 at 09:42 AM.

  6. #35
    arwen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Dundee
    Posts
    261
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 45 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    I was only ever interested in the Intel version. But it looks like its gonna cost a small fortune. :-/
    Looking at them from a works point of view. I don't see the advantage of having an RT Surface over an Android/ipad (as in integrating it to the network). Or am I missing something?

  7. #36
    HMCTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    618
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 48 Times in 35 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by arwen View Post
    I was only ever interested in the Intel version. But it looks like its gonna cost a small fortune. :-/
    Looking at them from a works point of view. I don't see the advantage of having an RT Surface over an Android/ipad (as in integrating it to the network). Or am I missing something?
    Someone may know more but I always believed that the RT was the one you had at home and used for personal use and was the iPad equivalent. The advantage for a school or enterprise was the Surface Pro and the ability to join to the domain, be managed centrally and give access to what all middle managers are "desperate" for. Access to documents, collaboration and be more efficient. So I am looking forward to January when we take away their iPads and give them Surface Pro's as they tick all their initial requirements for a tablet where as the iPad ticked less than 20% of what they wanted them for.

  8. #37

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    384
    Thank Post
    35
    Thanked 56 Times in 53 Posts
    Rep Power
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexPilot View Post
    Someone may know more but I always believed that the RT was the one you had at home and used for personal use and was the iPad equivalent. The advantage for a school or enterprise was the Surface Pro and the ability to join to the domain, be managed centrally and give access to what all middle managers are "desperate" for. Access to documents, collaboration and be more efficient. So I am looking forward to January when we take away their iPads and give them Surface Pro's as they tick all their initial requirements for a tablet where as the iPad ticked less than 20% of what they wanted them for.
    Same here (nail head job done) anticipate they will still want their ipads for angry birds.

    The way in which they will be able to join the domain and access the shares etc as you mention will be an instant crowd pleaser amongst our staff.

  9. #38
    HMCTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    618
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 48 Times in 35 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Yes I am looking forward to ousting these staff who don't want efficiency, collaboration or working on the move they just want iPads and iPads the school pay for which they wont have soon.

    We have ordered two of the RT's to see what they are like and if they are any better than an iPad. And to test out Office 2013 which can link our domain accounts to SkyDrive accounts so the more mobile of users can save to SkyDrive from Office 2013 and open on the RT and visa versa. This may or may not work but worth a try for those that don't require a full Surface Pro.

  10. #39

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    79
    Thank Post
    8
    Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexPilot View Post
    Someone may know more but I always believed that the RT was the one you had at home and used for personal use and was the iPad equivalent. The advantage for a school or enterprise was the Surface Pro and the ability to join to the domain, be managed centrally and give access to what all middle managers are "desperate" for. Access to documents, collaboration and be more efficient.
    Windows RT is supposed to be manageable using Windows InTune at some point early next year which obviously isn't as nice as joining it to your domain and using existing tools but there will be the option to do it.

    Haven't seen anything to indicate what you will actually be able to manage with it though.

  11. #40

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,934
    Thank Post
    138
    Thanked 290 Times in 210 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    Local GPO can be enabled on RT devices and according to the app development guide it can also access network shares.
    Last edited by Theblacksheep; 17th October 2012 at 10:35 AM.

  12. #41
    arwen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Dundee
    Posts
    261
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 45 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexPilot View Post
    Someone may know more but I always believed that the RT was the one you had at home and used for personal use and was the iPad equivalent. The advantage for a school or enterprise was the Surface Pro and the ability to join to the domain, be managed centrally and give access to what all middle managers are "desperate" for. Access to documents, collaboration and be more efficient. So I am looking forward to January when we take away their iPads and give them Surface Pro's as they tick all their initial requirements for a tablet where as the iPad ticked less than 20% of what they wanted them for.
    Cool, thats exactly what I thought :-)

  13. #42
    flyinghaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    994
    Thank Post
    99
    Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts
    Rep Power
    114
    I'd kind of hoped that the Windows RT tablets would be a budget alternative to be honest. If they're going to cost upwards of 500 then personally I'd rather go for an x86 based version providing it doesn't hurt the battery life too much. Hopefully Intel can pull something special out of the bag with their upcoming clovertrail atom CPU's.

  14. #43

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,652
    Thank Post
    516
    Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,891 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by flyinghaggis View Post
    I'd kind of hoped that the Windows RT tablets would be a budget alternative to be honest. If they're going to cost upwards of 500 then personally I'd rather go for an x86 based version providing it doesn't hurt the battery life too much. Hopefully Intel can pull something special out of the bag with their upcoming clovertrail atom CPU's.
    They won't be running Atom CPUs... They'll be running i5 processors from all the blurb that's been going around.

  15. #44
    flyinghaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    994
    Thank Post
    99
    Thanked 70 Times in 57 Posts
    Rep Power
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    They won't be running Atom CPUs... They'll be running i5 processors from all the blurb that's been going around.
    Sorry, I went a bit OT there. The x86 surface pro is going to be an i5 but i was just referring to Windows 8 Tablets in general! The surface pro sounds awesome but I worry about the effect of that Core i5 on its' battery life. The upcoming atom is promising power usage close to an ARM CPU so if Intel can match the performance of the tegra3 that would probably be a better fit for a tablet device IMO.

  16. #45

    3s-gtech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    2,712
    Thank Post
    144
    Thanked 548 Times in 492 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    Considering what Intel achieved with the mobile Medfield chip, I think there'll be some impressive x86 chips about for tablets in the next couple of years. Low power usage with impressive performance is already there.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Microsoft Surface at BETT 09
    By apearce in forum BETT 2014
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 22nd January 2009, 04:25 PM
  2. Microsoft Surface
    By m1ddy in forum Windows
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 19th May 2008, 03:22 PM
  3. The Microsoft Surface
    By Mr_T in forum Hardware
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 15th June 2007, 08:48 AM
  4. Microsoft Surface
    By russdev in forum Hardware
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13th June 2007, 09:40 AM
  5. Microsoft Surface (I want!)
    By Rozzer in forum Windows
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 30th May 2007, 03:20 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •