If the school doesn’t use FMS and uses Sage, there are very little changes to SIMS.
The school changes the DfE code and that’s pretty much it for new Academies.
Primary to Academy Quote below:
On a slightly different note: Somebody (My guess a MIS/LP supplier) is collecting some interesting information from organisations.
Anyone had one of these recently?
I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information act for the following information.
1. Who is the office in charge with commercial responsibility for your Management Information System (MIS) in use at your schools? By School MIS I mean products such as Capita SIMS, Serco CMIS, RM Integris, Pearson E1, Bromcom and Walton Samuel. Please provide his or her name, position, mailing address, email address and telephone number.
2. Who is the office in charge with commercial responsibility for your Pupil Management Information System used in the authority? By Authority MIS I mean products such as Capita One and Tribal Synergy. Please provide his or her name, position, mailing address, email address and telephone number.
3. Who is the office in charge with commercial responsibility for your Learning Platform (LP) in use at your schools? By School LP I mean products such as Moodle, Frog, and Fronter. Please provide his or her name, position, mailing address, email address and telephone number.
Will someone finally challenge the Capita LA annual maintenance contract as a being a new contract that should have gone through a full procurement and try to get it set aside?
That's crazy, someone who knows a little is pushing a lot.
Does listing who is responsible for your MIS fall under freedom of information act? including email / phone number?
That's badly written too, or was there a typo?
It's pretty forthright, I've seen better from data harvesters and call centres.
Commercial responsibility for a learning platform? That doesn't fall under FOI as far as I'm aware.
Does providing that info not breach data protection?
The Act gives a right of access to information that is recorded in any form at the time of the request.
The Code provides guidance on good practice for public authorities in connection with the discharge of their functions under Part I of the Act. The main features of Part I Freedom of Information Act 2000 are:
general rights of access in relation to recorded information held by public authorities, subject to certain conditions and exemptions;
If you hold the information you pretty much have to disclose it - exemptions are usally Union related for public bodies
Common practice is to give out the role name, rather than the person's name. If someone wants to have a complete list of the names of each person involved then they have to ring up the establishment and ask for the name of the post holder. This helps to prevent certain companies generating a list of details of people which can then be sold to spam folk, and still allowing control of personal / professional data by the individual role holder.
If you have had an FoI request you should always consider DPA.
I was going to say, we store data on students, no-one can just send in a request for this info can they.
Back to the original request:
It can't have come anonymously, presumably a school can query who is making the request, and possibly the purpose...?
A school can charge a reasonable amount to put the data together for the requester..?
I would want to ask for clarification of the request 'office in charge of commercial responsibility...' it's a bit of a mouthful. Would you say it's the MIS manager or is the 'office in charge' the head / board of governors...?
Query 2 you can just say you don't know and refer them to the LA, right?
An FoI request simply has to have the question, the applicant's name and a return address (be that email or physical).
You have no right to know the purpose of the request. A fee can be charged I believe, but at a cost of £25 per hour for the work. So, compiling a list of staff names should not even take an hour - and someone asking for that information being told their is a fee involved might be able to complain to the ICO about it.
Clarifications are fine though.
And passing this to the LEA would lead to them telling you to take a leap as it is not their responsibility to answer FoI requests for a school.
I didn't mean bounce the whole request to LA i meant specifically query #2:
I still don't understand the way the questions are phrased. Why would the school have someone responsible for the LA MIS system? Unless they mean, who makes sure data is fed back to their system correctly.Quote:
2. Who is the office in charge with commercial responsibility for your Pupil Management Information System used in the authority?
Like i said, it would be easier to call up and ask who is the database manager please, and who handles the VLE. Social engineering seems a much easier approach. Has anyone else had this request?
I'd be interested to know if someone really is going to challenge these charges / renewal processes.
I would start the paperwork cost starting at when i first had to post on Edugeek, until i got a definitive answer :p just like a lawyer would. At the least you can charge for a minimum of one hour. At least it might make the person think twice.