MIS Systems Thread, Personnel 5.1 on Terminal Services in Technical; As the last part of our Terminal Services puzzle, we've been getting Personnel 5.1 to run (via the SIMS launcher). ...
-
5th June 2007, 02:42 PM #1 Personnel 5.1 on Terminal Services
As the last part of our Terminal Services puzzle, we've been getting Personnel 5.1 to run (via the SIMS launcher). After a lot of digging around, it is now installed, but I did have to add some compatibility information into the registry on the terminal server to allow it to run:
Code:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Terminal Server\Compatibility\Applications\LAUNCHER
The 'Flags' (a REG_DWORD) value are set to '504' (hex) which basically directs all DLL and .ini references to the server system root (ie C:\windows) rather than each user's profile (C:\documents and settings\user\windows).
The only problem I'm currently encountering is that anyone running the Launcher has to be a machine admin, which isn't ideal.
If there was a definitive list of files/registry paths that Launcher/Personnel accesses, I could change permissions accordingly. Bit of a long shot, I know, but it never hurts to ask
Stephen
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
6th June 2007, 12:25 PM #2 Re: Personnel 5.1 on Terminal Services
You would use a comination of filemon and regmon from sysinternals or the new process monitor from microsofts acquisiton of sysinternals. this will list all the things the process is attempting to access.
after looking throught this i imagine you will be able to sort it 
fooby
-
-
6th June 2007, 09:44 PM #3 Re: Personnel 5.1 on Terminal Services
After spending a mind-numbingly long time reading through registry/file access logs, I discovered that the problem lay with the SIMS server machines, and not the terminal server 
I'd given the Windows users full control over the SIMS folder within the SIMS share, but I apparently needed to give them full control over the root of the share too! Can't really see why, since nothing gets put in the share root, but I'll put it down to a combination of crusty old code and Microsoft Terminal Services.
Now, if RM could just discover why the VPNs don't work, I'll be happy...
Stephen
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
Replies: 5
Last Post: 1st September 2009, 08:17 PM
-
By Lee_K_81 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 13
Last Post: 7th November 2007, 10:49 AM
-
By wesleyw in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 2
Last Post: 30th June 2006, 12:34 PM
-
Replies: 15
Last Post: 1st June 2006, 10:37 AM
-
By Dos_Box in forum Windows
Replies: 4
Last Post: 25th May 2006, 01:26 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules