Won't make much of a difference in the future when all this stuff moves into the cloud.
Also you can do the 2008 upgrade yourself, the last one was a 60 minute job from what I remember.
[Quoting content that was <Edited for unauthorised adverising - Dos_Box> ]
but am I still right in the assumption that when your database needs to be migrated the sites will need to purchase a new licence??
Equally does bromcom work fully with FIrefox or chrome etc
Last edited by vikpaw; 9th February 2010 at 07:16 AM. Reason: removing quote content that was unauthorised
Indeed, Bromcom teacher's client software for "in classroom use" work fully for IE 7&9, Firefox, Chrome, Safari and Opera with any operating system and with no emulation.
Admin office parts/use is tested for only IE7&8.
I once worked on a very serious "MIS" (at least as complex as SIMS and definitely with more concurrent users) Server-side was in four logical parts and each one fitted in < 1MB RAM running on a DOS VM. Mid-late 90s everyone went "We must have our data in an 'open' database so we can access it", which of course they never do (or can't because of licence restrictions) and the bloat began. XML did a similar thing to comms bandwidth.But, with all of the newly addressable memory and speedy databases how long before they fill it all with bloated modules and subroutines?
The X64 is a very good point (it's the default for me for any new server): I don't know about this round, but there was a very significant memory increase for SIMS SQL2K->SQL2K5.
I don't know how you conclude that an all-browser based MIS would therefore results in fewer CALs?
Is Bromcom thinking of using the external connector?
But then you couldn't use the SQL\Windows security???
Bromcom is happy to be corrected but since Microsoft Windows Server 2003 internet users do not use up a windows CAL licence. In stating this, Bromcom relies on the following extract from Microft License information. However reader should check for themselves and not rely on this.
”In previous Windows Server licensing models, Windows Client Access Licenses were automatically triggered when particular server services were invoked (such as file, print, remote access, and terminal services, as well as authenticated access).
With Windows Server 2003, CALs are no longer triggered based on the use of certain services but are instead based on access to and/or use of the server software. This holds true for all editions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2003 R2, except Web Edition. Windows CALs are not required for Web Edition.
Note the following general exception to Windows CAL requirements: Windows CALs are not required when access to the server software is unauthenticated and conducted through the Internet. Authenticated access is defined as an exchange of user or application credentials between the server software and a user or device. An example of this exception would be if unidentified users browsed your public Web site. Windows CALs would not be required for those users.”
If this is the case it means using a browser based MIS, in addition to the other benefits stated previously, will also bring further saving in Microsoft license cost for schools with large number of users.
Last edited by BromcomPublicRelations; 2nd February 2010 at 07:57 PM. Reason: Typo
i'm confused now Bromcom.
I initially thought we were talking about SQL CALS, such that if you connected via a browser to a server and that server/software made the SQL calls then effectively there'd only be one SQL user. i think i was dreaming.
Either way, Windows CALS would still be needed wouldn't they, even for web access, certainly if we are wanting authenticated access which i hope we all are.
What are the issues around Server 2008 which is where we are headed?
I'm slightly confused as to which licences we're discussing now, too, but I believe that as far as SQL CALs are concerned, you need a separate SQL CAL for each user that has write access to the database, no matter how they achieve that access. So the presumption that because the web service connects to the database via a single server they only need one CAL isn't correct. There's fine print in the licensing documentation that states that any ability for users to log into a system that connects those users directly to an SQL database with write access, even if that's a custom login function, then they're considered separate users and require a CAL.
I personally didn't liaise with Microsoft on this, but a colleague of mine did, and after explaining the access model used by the Serco ePortal product (which uses an internal login authentication model) we were told specifically that this is covered by the licensing agreement and explicitly requires an SQL CAL to be purchased.
As to how many Server 2003/2008 CALs you'd need to purchase, I'm not so sure. We were only concerned with the SQL side of the equation when we were looking into upgrading our schools to SQL 2005. Others will doubtless have a better understanding of this aspect, and it might well turn out that Bromcom's interpretation of the Server CAL model is accurate.
I am slightly surprised that Bromcom are adopting a model whereby they require each of their customers to purchase SQL CALs for their access to the product. Surely part of the net gains you get from hosted solutions is lowering overall infrastructure costs, so why not internalise the costs of the licensing and spread that cost out across your customer base. You would obviously then be purchasing the per-processor (which includes unlimited CALs) licensing model, which, as the userbase increases, clearly leads to significant savings on the overall licensing costs?
Microsoft Windows Server CALs: Our understanding is as stated in our previous post.
Microsoft SQL CALs: We beleive, SkywOrca's interpreation is correct. Each user needs an SQL CAL.
However on the point of Bromcom's deployment model, main portal products are 'centrally hosted' and hence per-processor licensing model applies. These are MyChildAtSchool, Teacher'sWebFolder and Galaxy-VLE. For Hosted service for MIS per-processor based model is used. However we are finding that generally whilst primary schopols are OK, secondary schools are not keen to have their data off site. Speed and resilienece to broadband service level may also be consideration.
The advantage of Bromcom MIS is that schools have a choice whether to have it on site or hosted. You may find that with the other browser based MIS software you do not have this choice.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)