MIS Systems Thread, The UK Government and MIS Systems in Technical; @CAM
the problem with IE was that it was closed and had a huge percentage of market share. Just like ...
6th July 2009, 02:46 PM #31
the problem with IE was that it was closed and had a huge percentage of market share. Just like Capita does now (80%IIRC). If a central body provided funding for an opensource MIS it would open the market, not close it.
To suggest that opensource would somehow stifle competition is misleading.
IDG Tech News
6th July 2009, 02:48 PM #32
I would rather the Government simply publish the specifications and standards (open and freely of course) detailing how the expect a School MIS to work. Then let free market economics do the rest.
6th July 2009, 02:59 PM #33
You mean like ATF, CTF, census, SIF...
Originally Posted by Geoff
6th July 2009, 03:50 PM #34
Originally Posted by matt40k
Heh. I dare you to construct a usable MIS given that information.
6th July 2009, 03:58 PM #35
If there was one centrally funded MIS given away for free, which met all school requirements, it would effectively kill any commercial MIS development.
Originally Posted by CyberNerd
The reason something like say, Open Office, hasn't done this is because Microsoft Office is in many ways better, and has better support. With the same funding as a commercial office package gets for development, support and so on, and no cost to customers you would quite effectively wipe out any commercial value in developing office products.
Look at it like this - if the government funded training for school network managers to a high quality, and offered them free to schools with no conditions or provisions, how many network managers would still be in a job except those that the government was providing?
6th July 2009, 04:22 PM #36
I disagree, having an open system - no matter how it is funded will inevitably increase competition.
Originally Posted by jamesb
I don't think anybody was advocating that govt. legislate schools to use only one (open) system (although in some countries govt depts must only use OSS).
There will always be competition and putting a small fraction of the Capita tax into developing an open MIS platform could only be a good thing. I would agree that if you put all the money that capita get now into OSS development it would probably be overkill (because because they charge so much in the first place) but I wasn't advocating that either. I was delighted to hear that only 11% of their 2441 million turnover is from education (268 MILLION!)
I do agree with others that the best starting point is to ensure the use of open the standards as this will naturally encourage OSS development. I would just like to see the playing field being levelled a bit as I believe this would lower costs for schools and create a better product.
the best ones would still get employed, but the bar would be raised.
Originally Posted by jamesb
6th July 2009, 04:44 PM #37
Wow, that seems inefficient. So a teacher writes all their marks down, and then the office staff have to copy them in? Seems like doubling of effort... But whatever works...
Originally Posted by nephilim
6th July 2009, 04:52 PM #38
Believe me it was NOT my idea! lol
6th July 2009, 06:33 PM #39
I think you missed my point CyberNerd, but jamesb hit the nail on the head perfectly. Monopoly laws exist for a reason and if the MIS, Open Source or not, was provided free to schools and on par if not better then the competition it will wipe out the entire market. No competition means no drive to improve the product. IE versus FireFox was an example in that the arrival of Firefox suddenly gave reason for a drive to improve IE. Until then it was stagnating.
It doesn't matter if someone can see the code and rewrite it to make their own product. They won't have the resources of the government or early knowledge of upcoming changes to future MIS requirements when planning development. It'll be no competition.
6th July 2009, 07:11 PM #40
As been said before its the ever changing government requirements that would kill an opensource solution unless an LA or school hired a a coder to do those changes.
6th July 2009, 08:14 PM #41
And indeed you'd still have to pay someone to support it, and have people further up who could support those, people providing the endless updates to the government's ever moving goalposts.
SIMS attracts all sorts of attention, granted much of it appears to be negative, however as part of visits I always make sure all the staff are happy with everything, making sure it's all running OK and doing as it should. 99% of the time the answer is "Yeah, great thanks, no problems" - because you don't hear the negatives.
There are downsides to it - it is a little bloaty, however streamlining something like an MIS would be a task akin to starting afresh. It's a solid base, it just appears to need a little work. However, how easy getting that work done, by the right people, and in the right way ("right" by definition here being how the users see it, and one user may feel "right" is different to the next) is something else entirely. I don't know if Capita are open to suggestion on the performance or function of SIMS, or even if it's allowed by whatever governmental ruling may or may not exist.
This is where open source is a godsend. A lot of people instinctively believe that if the source is available for everyone to see, it's easier to see the flaws and abuse them. That's very true, and also the very same reason that it is by default, more secure. If there's a problem, there's always multitudes of people happy to chip in to fix it, or suggest to the devs what they could do to remedy it. But how do you then keep such software standard, so as not to upset those precious Guidelines set in place. I'm sure it could be done, after all we'd not be using whatever browser you're using now, whatever OS you're using now. Apple wouldn't exist in it's current form. Microsoft would still have the absolute monopoly. You'd probably give up using cash machines and prefer to see your money handed over at the till. Many many what-ifs could be used as an example here, but it's straying from the point and I'm rambling.
So the solution? I'd like to believe Capita should perhaps be more open with the development of SIMS, but don't think open source is necessarily a solution in itself. You could say too many cooks can spoil the broth - but what if the broth is already spoiled - would more cooks make it worse?
*** Edit ****
I'd like to apologise to anyone that's just read the above. That's probably far too philosophical for a) a Monday and b) for Me.
6th July 2009, 10:29 PM #42
I've just put a new proposal up for the Open Source Schools Unconference:
A plugins ecosystem for schools Management Information Systems | Open Source Schools
7th July 2009, 01:42 AM #43
Do you actually know what you are talking about? Open source does not mean open data source, do not continue to propagate rubbish without first doing your homework.
Originally Posted by f21970
9th July 2009, 12:34 PM #44
"Writing a complete, monolithic Management Information System (MIS) for a school is a large undertaking. MIS' are the very definition of "enterprise software" - the dull but neccesary applications that take up the bulk of programming effort worldwide."
DHicks - I have to take issue with you!! We don't consider applications that can change children's lives for the better, to be dull. It is fantastic to go into schools that use our software to the full, enthusiastically.
As it happens many many years ago there was a government funded project to build a school MIS, millions were spent. Our school couldn't afford it and I wrote what became SIMS in my spare time. The trouble was I couldn't support it in my spare time because people were using it during the day and I was teaching. Hence it went commercial.
9th July 2009, 12:44 PM #45
Shhh!! You'll get the others talking about the old SMAC days!!
Originally Posted by PhilNeal
By russdev in forum US MIS Software
Last Post: 19th March 2012, 06:11 AM
By russdev in forum Blue Skies
Last Post: 17th November 2010, 09:34 AM
By adamf in forum Virtual Learning Platforms
Last Post: 3rd May 2008, 06:24 PM
By mattx in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Last Post: 23rd January 2008, 10:54 AM
By russdev in forum Blue Skies
Last Post: 20th March 2007, 10:19 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)