+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37
MIS Systems Thread, Firedrill with SIMS in Technical; Originally Posted by vikpaw At my old school i did a test during a fire drill: i kept one student ...
  1. #31
    p858snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    1,490
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 175 Times in 151 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by vikpaw View Post
    At my old school i did a test during a fire drill:

    i kept one student behind in my office during the drill, then escorted them out but didn't let them return to their registration point. on the way out i found a teacher from a nearby classroom, carefully balancing his cup of coffee whilst trying to lock his door!

    At the foot of the stairs an assistant head was purportedly supervising the exit, but actually just watching students run past the nearest exit and out to the door on the other side of the corridor which was the easier route out to the meeting point.

    Meanwhile, at the front of the school, sixth formers from other schools were walking on site, ignoring the bells and trying to get into the building.

    Suffice to say, the student i kept behind wasn't missed and the Head (another word springs to mind ) a few minutes later announced the drill a success and told everyone to go back into class.

    Thankfully, as mentioned earlier the fire department shouldn't and don't trust a teacher with a register be it paper or electronic!

    The site manager and i decided that we were doing the best we could, and that his team always cleared the alarm point (we always checked it wasn't a prank first) and the fire team if they were needed would do it a second time.
    locking a door...... thats a big no no... the fire department needs quick access to all areas and if it means it they will kick/damage a door compared to finding keys for it.

  2. #32

    vikpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Saudi Arabia
    Posts
    5,779
    Thank Post
    714
    Thanked 1,437 Times in 1,190 Posts
    Rep Power
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by NickJones View Post
    There's not necessarily anything wrong with that. The objective is not in fact to evacuate the building as quickly as possible, but to account for everyone's safe evacuation as quickly as possible. If this means people walk past one door in order to get to another which is nearer the assembly point, that is fine.

    and what if they are running towards an area where there is danger or a fire? it wasn't just two doors opposite eachother, they had to go through double doors to access the corridor then out the other side exposing themselves to the fronts of other rooms!

    i thought the idea was to use the nearest exit to get out and safe asap.

  3. #33
    enjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Reading, Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,490
    Thank Post
    282
    Thanked 196 Times in 167 Posts
    Rep Power
    76
    Consider the following:
    Route 1 - students leave by the closest exit and walk half-way around the building, arriving at the assembly point in 2m40s.
    Route 2 - students pass that door and use another one which puts them on the other side of the building, arriving at the assembly point in 1m20s.

    The objective is not to clear the building, but to verify that you have done so - this does not happen until every person has arrived safely at the assembly point, so the aim is to leave the building in whatever way achieves that in the least amount of time; using my example above, this would be route 1.

    Also consider that if the fire is causing 3rd floor windows to blow out, raining glass down on the pathway underneath, walking along a 1st floor corridor might be safer than being outside.

    This is the advice we were given when reviewing our evacuation routes recently.

  4. #34

    matt40k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    4,442
    Thank Post
    369
    Thanked 650 Times in 531 Posts
    Rep Power
    160
    I have to agree with vikpaw, I've also been told to exit by the nearest door and get out of the building as quickly as possible.

    It covers that possibility that the extra few steps could lead to a nice warm fire making friends with your body, it does however affect your lovely statistics, not that would you care if the fire got you.

  5. #35
    enjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Reading, Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,490
    Thank Post
    282
    Thanked 196 Times in 167 Posts
    Rep Power
    76
    There is always the risk that any route will mean you meet the fire - in those instances, you change your plans. BUT, if you know that the fire is in building 1, then surely the best route from building 2 is the one which gets you to the assembly point in the shortest amount of time?

    So we were told by our fire safety consultant anyway.

  6. #36
    IrritableTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire
    Posts
    848
    Thank Post
    99
    Thanked 195 Times in 159 Posts
    Rep Power
    69
    At my old place I was on the H&S panel for a bit.

    One fire drill we blocked a staircase, and told everyone that attempted to leave that way the fire was in that staircase. It caused all sorts of problems, and proved that people needed a reminder of their alternative exit points!

    We thought about firing off the smoke machine from drama, but were worried it might cause a panic!

  7. #37

    vikpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Saudi Arabia
    Posts
    5,779
    Thank Post
    714
    Thanked 1,437 Times in 1,190 Posts
    Rep Power
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by NickJones View Post
    There is always the risk that any route will mean you meet the fire - in those instances, you change your plans. BUT, if you know that the fire is in building 1, then surely the best route from building 2 is the one which gets you to the assembly point in the shortest amount of time?

    So we were told by our fire safety consultant anyway.
    i'm surprised a fire consultant would say that. maybe in a drill situation where things are planned and certain teachers are given a heads up! you probably wont know where the fire is.

    i still think, get out as quick as possible by the nearest exit. every fire procedures document i've ever read says leave by the nearest exit. keep clear of the building etc.

    accounting for everyone is not easily possible, that is part of the reason for this thread, we can never know who may be in or come into the building without being registered or accounted for. since we are likely to have incorrect data and the fire dept. wont rely on our registers anyway, the best thing to do is get people out of the building and away from possible danger. the fire dept. will sweep the local area.

  8. Thanks to vikpaw from:

    matt40k (21st July 2009)

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. SIMS edit pupils' details crashing SIMS.net
    By CadlaM in forum MIS Systems
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13th January 2009, 02:20 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •