+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
Jokes/Interweb Things Thread, IE7 Tax in Fun Stuff; BBC News - World's first 'tax' on Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7...
  1. #1

    Jawloms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    831
    Thank Post
    177
    Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
    Rep Power
    185

    IE7 Tax


  2. #2

    Edu-IT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,161
    Thank Post
    403
    Thanked 623 Times in 569 Posts
    Rep Power
    181
    Interesting! Not sure it'll work though. Could backfire.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    93
    Thank Post
    7
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    It's not a bad idea to prod people to upgrade, I'm not sure that this is the best way of doing it though. More important than website compatibility is computer security - your antivirus software (or more likely Windows Security Centre) flashes up that you're open to invading nasties when your definitions are out of date, maybe the same should happen for your browser.

    Alternatively there's the Google Chrome route - stealth updates

  4. #4

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    6,079
    Thank Post
    593
    Thanked 1,045 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    470
    I like it - a lot I especially like that they don't even recommend using the frankly smegging awful IE9.
    Moodle 2, CSS and IE do not mix.

  5. #5

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,190
    Thank Post
    875
    Thanked 2,717 Times in 2,302 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    780
    Bahh, it should be an old browser tax but if they don't want business from x% of clients thats fine, its their bottom line.

  6. #6

    SimpleSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    5,822
    Thank Post
    1,476
    Thanked 593 Times in 445 Posts
    Rep Power
    168
    Clever idea - worst case for the company if that they lose 3% of current sales but I'd though easily compenstated for by the publicity generated

    Si

  7. #7


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,069
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 2,719 Times in 2,007 Posts
    Rep Power
    797

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    184
    Thank Post
    17
    Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    ....and Edexcel's online marking software won't work on IE9, only IE8 (previous versions wouldn't work on IE8, only 7 - and it doesn't work at all on other browsers). So much for the white heat of the technological revolution.....

  9. #9

    X-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    9,177
    Thank Post
    601
    Thanked 1,993 Times in 1,372 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    837
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur View Post
    Attachment 14309


    Wat.

  10. #10


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,069
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 2,719 Times in 2,007 Posts
    Rep Power
    797
    Quote Originally Posted by X-13 View Post
    Wat
    Looks similar to the issue described here or here. I don't think it's anything to worry about.

  11. #11

    LeightonJames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    581
    Thank Post
    13
    Thanked 55 Times in 34 Posts
    Rep Power
    262
    Is it just me or is there something not quite right about the images in the second link.

    Let's break it down:

    Image 1:

    Cost of TV - $682.45
    Delivery - $29.78
    IE7 Tax - $43.45

    Total on Screen - $712.23

    Actual Total should be - $755.68 - IE7 Tax isn't applied at all on this screen

    Image 2:

    TV Price - $639.00

    Total On screen - $668.78

    Again no IE7 Tax but the TV costs are different

    Anyone care to venture a guess at the real cost of the TV???

  12. #12

    X-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    9,177
    Thank Post
    601
    Thanked 1,993 Times in 1,372 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    837
    Quote Originally Posted by LeightonJames View Post
    Is it just me or is there something not quite right about the images in the second link.
    It's a hoax. They aren't actually taxing people for using IE7.

  13. #13

    Steve21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    2,698
    Thank Post
    335
    Thanked 516 Times in 484 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by LeightonJames View Post
    Is it just me or is there something not quite right about the images in the second link.

    Let's break it down:

    Image 1:

    Cost of TV - $682.45
    Delivery - $29.78
    IE7 Tax - $43.45

    Total on Screen - $712.23

    Actual Total should be - $755.68 - IE7 Tax isn't applied at all on this screen

    Image 2:

    TV Price - $639.00

    Total On screen - $668.78

    Again no IE7 Tax but the TV costs are different

    Anyone care to venture a guess at the real cost of the TV???
    Err?

    $682.45 - $43.45 = $639.00

    Tax already included on first one, just shows how much it was?

    - Know it's a joke, but still works out imo

    Steve

  14. #14

    LeightonJames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    581
    Thank Post
    13
    Thanked 55 Times in 34 Posts
    Rep Power
    262
    Ah, they've added the tax on in the first screen then! The screenshot makes it look like it should be added on afterwards.

    Quote Originally Posted by X-13 View Post
    It's a hoax. They aren't actually taxing people for using IE7.
    [sarcasm] Is it??? Good Gosh, silly me! [/sarcasm]

    I know it's a hoax but the numbers just didn't look right that's all. What i was getting at was the fact that if they were going to pull this hoax they should have at least made the numbers look right.
    Last edited by LeightonJames; 15th June 2012 at 02:39 PM.

  15. #15
    Disease's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,099
    Thank Post
    118
    Thanked 70 Times in 48 Posts
    Rep Power
    56
    I think it would be funny if Microsoft Sued them and his company went bust.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. IE7 Public Beta
    By Norphy in forum Windows
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 7th August 2007, 12:07 AM
  2. IE7 available
    By CyberNerd in forum Windows
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 13th April 2007, 09:17 AM
  3. WebDav and IE7 (vista RC1 5600)
    By k-strider in forum Windows Vista
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19th October 2006, 09:26 PM
  4. IE7/Vista - Phishing Filter
    By Gatt in forum Windows Vista
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13th August 2006, 07:53 PM
  5. urgent need IE7
    By russdev in forum Windows Vista
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 19th December 2005, 12:03 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •