+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Jokes/Interweb Things Thread, Power-Loss-Protected SSDs Tested in Fun Stuff; Click the link to read the full report. The results are quite interesting. Link : http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html (via Slashdot ) Analysis ...
  1. #1


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,709
    Thank Post
    220
    Thanked 2,615 Times in 1,926 Posts
    Rep Power
    777

    Power-Loss-Protected SSDs Tested

    Click the link to read the full report. The results are quite interesting.

    Link: http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html (via Slashdot)

    Analysis of SSD Reliability during power-outages
    This report was originally commissioned due to the remote deployment of over 200 32GB OCZ SSDs resulting in severe data corruption in over 50% of the units. The recovery costs were far in excess of the costs saved by purchasing the cheaper OCZ units. They were replaced rapidly over a period of years by Intel SSD 320s, where, despite remote deployment of over 500 units there have only ever been three unrecoverable failures.

    However, the Intel 320 SSD has reached end-of-life, so a replacement was sought. Due to paranoia over the OCZs an in-depth analysis was requested. Around the time that the paranoia was hitting, a report had come out on slashdot, covering power-related corruption.

    It made sense therefore to attempt to replicate that report, as it was believed that the data corruption of the OCZs was related to power loss.

    This report therefore covers the drives selected and the testing that was carried out. We follow up with a conclusion (summary: if you care about power loss don't buy anything other than Intel SSDs - end of story) and some interesting twists.

    Picking drives for testing
    The scenario for deployment is one where huge amounts of data simply are not required. An 8GB drive would be able to store 1 month's worth of sensor data, as well as have room for a 1.5GB OS deployment. A 16GB drive stores over two months. Bizarrely, except in the Industrial arena the focus is on constant increases in data storage capacity rather than data reliability. The fact that shrinking geometries automatically results in higher susceptibility to data corruption is left for another time, however.

    Additionally, due to the aforementioned paranoia and assumptions that the data loss was occurring due to loss of power, the requirements to have "Power Loss Protection" were made mandatory. Power Loss Protection is usually found in Industrial and Server Grade SSDs, which are typically more expensive.

    So, finding low-cost low-size reliable SSD reported to have "Power Loss Protection" proved... challenging. After an exhaustive search, the following candidates were found:

    • Crucial M4 128GB
    • The unpronounceable Toshiba THNSNH060GCS 60GB
    • The new Intel S3500
    • The Innodisk 3MP SATA Slim (8GB and 16GB)

    The Innodisk units came in around 30, whilst all the other drives came in at between 60 and 90. Also added to the testing was the original 32gb Vertex OCZ and the Intel 320.
    Last edited by Arthur; 30th December 2013 at 07:50 PM.

  2. #2

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,841
    Thank Post
    569
    Thanked 994 Times in 766 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    460
    He hasn't thrown away anything branded "Innodisk" (also read Innovision) as something diabolical without second thought. Taken with pinch of salt!

  3. #3


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,709
    Thank Post
    220
    Thanked 2,615 Times in 1,926 Posts
    Rep Power
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by synaesthesia View Post
    He hasn't thrown away anything branded "Innodisk" (also read Innovision) as something diabolical without second thought.
    Given his requirements it's easy to see why he chose the Innodisk and OCZ SSDs, especially when purchasing hundreds of drives. In the end it turned out to be a bit of a false economy.

    Personally, I would have automatically discounted anything made by OCZ and SSDs smaller than 32GB.

  4. #4

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,841
    Thank Post
    569
    Thanked 994 Times in 766 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    460
    For his requirements I wouldn't have been looking at consumer SSD period. Similar though; I'd have been barking up the compactflash tree. There's reasons CF is still used more often than consumer or enterprise grade SSD in that sort of application...

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Power loss to ESXi, SAN & Physical dc
    By TraineeGeek in forum Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19th December 2013, 09:07 PM
  2. SSD and power.
    By hardtailstar in forum Hardware
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 26th April 2013, 08:17 AM
  3. Scooter (Loss of power) - Mechanical input required
    By bodminman in forum General Chat
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 18th October 2011, 11:28 AM
  4. Sun Storage 7000 Power Protection Options
    By RobFuller in forum Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14th October 2009, 10:57 AM
  5. this is a test please ignore
    By russdev in forum General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23rd June 2005, 06:06 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •