+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53
Jokes/Interweb Things Thread, Tasered for being blind in Fun Stuff; Originally Posted by Disease On the same basis as your argument if you make a mistake you do not risk ...
  1. #46

    AMLightfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    2,243
    Thank Post
    406
    Thanked 663 Times in 414 Posts
    Rep Power
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by Disease View Post
    On the same basis as your argument if you make a mistake you do not risk being stabbed or shot, they do so it works both ways, also while we are on the subject are you expecting the police to take a medical history before tasering someone?

    "Wait there criminal I am going to taser you as you have a sword, now before I do sir do you have any medical conditions I should be aware of?" absolute pathetic liberal claptrap, that is why this country has gone to pot.
    I think this thread is losing sight of that fact that the issue was not that a person was tasered for carrying a sword (and indeed the original article states that a person was later arrested in another part of town for the sword incident), or indeed the issue of the use of tasers in policing, but that a police officer tasered a blind man carrying an assistance stick under the mistaken belief that the assistance stick was a sword. The issue in my mind is (and continues to be) that a device that has been linked to and associated with deaths either directly or from complications associated with its modus operandi was used on an innocent man because the operator of the device did not pause sufficiently to ascertain whether or not the long, slim white stick was in fact a japanese-style sword (of any description) and simply discharged his device. If the officer had a gun instead of a taser, would he have made the same decision? Was the appearance of the taser as 'non lethal' instrumental in the officer shooting this man? Did the officer think that 'I'm not sure if this person is dangerous, but the taser won't kill him so I'll shoot him anyway just to be on the safe side'? I don't think that's the right way to think.

    I certainly believe that in this day and age of feral 'yoof' and the increasing instance of assault as an answer to almost everything, our police force can no longer continue to be effective without a deterant and the taser is a suitable armament when the alternatives (firearms) are considered. What I don't agree with is that it was even POSSIBLE for the officer to make this kind of mistake. As a previous poster has mentioned, the range of a taser is 5-7m - it isn't hard to make out the details of a blind persons assistance stick at 6m (lets take an average there). If a police officer is in a position to discharge his weapon, clearly it was not a crowded place otherwise the level of risk of 'friendly fire' may have been too great and if it was too crowded to see the suspect properly, how can he be sure what he saw? So he has a clear view of the target, clear Line of sight, and the target is obviously not running, dodging or otherwise evading him. So what concerns me the most is the possibility that either the officer is visually impaired in some way, in which case why was he on active duty armed with a taser, and why did he find it appropriate to discharge a taser if he couldn't see the suspect clearly enough? Or the officer deliberately made the decision to 'shoot first ask questions later' which shows a level of arrogance and disregard for the person he tased. Especially when the circumstances of this specific incident easily allowed for the officer to clarify and confirm his observation whereupon he would have realised that the white stick was not a threat. The bloke obviously wasn't performing parkour-like acrobatics to get away from him was he? Or elbowing through crowds of people waving a blade. So why did the officer feel he needed to shoot so quickly?

  2. #47

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,343
    Thank Post
    525
    Thanked 2,597 Times in 2,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by Disease View Post
    On the same basis as your argument if you make a mistake you do not risk being stabbed or shot, they do so it works both ways, also while we are on the subject are you expecting the police to take a medical history before tasering someone?

    "Wait there criminal I am going to taser you as you have a sword, now before I do sir do you have any medical conditions I should be aware of?" absolute pathetic liberal claptrap, that is why this country has gone to pot.
    Way to miss the point. Was this man behaving in a threatening way? No. Was he waving a samurai sword around? No. Did the officer put any effort into actually making sure this blind old man was the person they wanted? No.

    No, instead, the police officer shot him in the back without doing any of the things they are required to do.

    If the man had been coming at him, swinging a stick, then the taser would be fine to use.

    And your comment is what I'd refer to as 'pathetic right wing nonsense', typical of the drivel spewed by those who think the country has gone to pot because of liberal attitudes.

  3. #48

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,144
    Thank Post
    1,917
    Thanked 1,346 Times in 744 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    396
    I'm marching in London on Saturday. It should be interesting as I'll be wearing my V for Vendetta mask. Last time I was down in London on a protest (26th March 2011) I was asked to remove it and when I did (only to reveal another one underneath) I spent twenty minutes in the back of a police van for my troubles. A tad heavy handed considering I'm a short, middle-aged, balding old fart. I don't condone any form of troublemaking but what I do object most strongly to is the gradual erosion of our right to protest that has become the reality in this country.

  4. #49

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,343
    Thank Post
    525
    Thanked 2,597 Times in 2,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    I'm marching in London on Saturday. It should be interesting as I'll be wearing my V for Vendetta mask. Last time I was down in London on a protest (26th March 2011) I was asked to remove it and when I did (only to reveal another one underneath) I spent twenty minutes in the back of a police van for my troubles. A tad heavy handed considering I'm a short, middle-aged, balding old fart. I don't condone any form of troublemaking but what I do object most strongly to is the gradual erosion of our right to protest.
    The law was changed a few years ago to make it an offence to not remove face coverings when instructed to by the police. Ridiculous really, but it was brought in to tackle the rising problem of 'black block' take-overs of protests where they come along all covered up and decide to cause trouble.

    I think it came in around the same time as the law making it illegal to engage in activity that could put police at risk - eg. photographing them.

  5. #50

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,144
    Thank Post
    1,917
    Thanked 1,346 Times in 744 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    396
    Are you involved in the badger cull protests? We're trying to organise something now that it seems to be going ahead in West Gloucestershire.

  6. #51

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,343
    Thank Post
    525
    Thanked 2,597 Times in 2,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    Are you involved in the badger cull protests? We're trying to organise something now that it seems to be going ahead in West Gloucestershire.
    I haven't been, but I'd be up for it, so long as it was all above board.

    Its a trek for me to get anywhere though. West Somerset has just had its licenses given too.

  7. #52

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,144
    Thank Post
    1,917
    Thanked 1,346 Times in 744 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    396
    Some links you may be aware of:
    Stop the cull - rspca.org.uk
    and:
    Badger Killers
    Mrs.Tech_Guy and myself are ready to do our bit. We'll be in Gloucestershire this Sunday to disrupt any culling activity if we can.

  8. #53
    januttall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    227
    Thank Post
    17
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    No doubt "lessons will be learned"...
    relay this is the police force.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Should I go for Be value?
    By nicholab in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 24th January 2012, 11:31 AM
  2. Spare part for vertical blinds needed
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22nd November 2011, 06:52 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th January 2007, 12:22 AM
  4. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 16th January 2007, 08:32 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •