+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall Thread, dogpile in Technical; Had a report via a teacher today about dogpile.com - a search aggregator. Seems that image search "moderate" filtering is ...
  1. #1
    pwds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Derby
    Posts
    279
    Thank Post
    73
    Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    20

    dogpile

    Had a report via a teacher today about dogpile.com - a search aggregator. Seems that image search "moderate" filtering is poor to say the least, searching for "hot" (which is a fairly innocuous and possibly innocent term) produced fairly sexualised images.

    Switching safe search off produced topless images for the same term.

    Block, block, block.

  2. #2

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,799
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,134 Times in 1,030 Posts
    Rep Power
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by pwds View Post
    Had a report via a teacher today about dogpile.com - a search aggregator. Seems that image search "moderate" filtering is poor to say the least, searching for "hot" (which is a fairly innocuous and possibly innocent term) produced fairly sexualised images.

    Switching safe search off produced topless images for the same term.

    Block, block, block.
    Its blocked when trying to search for images on the WSGFL, which i think is the same for LGFL aswell

    Toby

  3. #3

    elsiegee40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    10,702
    Thank Post
    1,784
    Thanked 2,169 Times in 1,604 Posts
    Rep Power
    769
    Blocked by RM SafetyNet already

  4. #4


    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    206
    Thank Post
    64
    Thanked 69 Times in 45 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Couple of comments:

    * Dogpile does not currently have its 'Heavy' level of filtering turned on by Smoothwall. With your comments in mind, I will look into making that possible.

    * Deep URL filtering will be active on image results. You may wish to block Unmoderated imagehosts (a new category) to combat some of the more risque results.

    * Naturally, there is the option to block completely...

  5. #5
    Batman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    940
    Thank Post
    115
    Thanked 118 Times in 74 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Wow... dogpile... That's a name I've not heard in ten years! I can't believe they're still going!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    It's surprising that people out there are still turning to older search engines outside the "Big 3". Search engines like DogPile really are lagging behind in terms of realtime and social media content aggregation, unlike Yahoo, Google and Bing these days. If you want relevant (and safe) results, you'd be better off sticking to the forerunners in my opinion.
    Isobel, agency:2

  7. #7


    tom_newton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,462
    Thank Post
    866
    Thanked 845 Times in 667 Posts
    Rep Power
    195
    Isobel, I think you are about right there.

  8. #8
    Batman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    940
    Thank Post
    115
    Thanked 118 Times in 74 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    I agree too.

    But there was a time when Dogpile, amongst others, was a good engine because it basically just did your search on a whole bunch of search engines, like Lycos, AltaVista, Yahoo, MSN, and gave you results from the whole bunch... which would save you from checking lots of different search engines manually... they all had wildly different results!

  9. #9


    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    206
    Thank Post
    64
    Thanked 69 Times in 45 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Whilst I agree with the comments above, I think the kids' "search quality metrics" differ from our own slightly...

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •