+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall Thread, Palto Alto in Technical; Well... We have the safe seach enforcement checked in V6, but this is not enforcing safe search for Google....
  1. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    130
    Thank Post
    29
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    Well...

    We have the safe seach enforcement checked in V6, but this is not enforcing safe search for Google.

  2. #17
    SJA
    SJA is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    12
    Thank Post
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    6
    I have just had a trial of a Fortinet device, and am currently in the second week of a Palo Alto trial. I managed to persuade the supplier to set up the Palo as a fully operational firewall and filtering device, rather than the in-line mode they usually advocate. This has allowed me to trial it in more detail, as it is functioning as it would if we were to go ahead and buy.

    I have the budget approved for both the Fortigate and Palo Alto.

    At the moment I am just really not convinced by all the praise that the Palo Alto receives. I am not thoroughly persuaded at the moment that it does anything more than slightly better than the Fortigate. It is very expensive. I see also that the log size is somewhat limited on the box (PA 3020), and the supplier suggests buying the Panorama product. This is another several thousand pounds!

    The Safe Search feature works, but it is annoying. With the Fortigate device it worked without bothering anyone. The Palo Alto insists that you set your own Safe Search to 'filter explicit results'. This is currently causing disruption to students and staff, as well as increased calls to support, as many people see an 'error' and immediately freeze and call IT support.

    I have trialled Sonicwall, Cyberoam, Watchguard, Smoothwall, Fortinet, Palo Alto, and considered Lightspeed, Bloxx, Sophos, Meraki, Cisco, Juniper, and Barracuda. They are all lacking in some significant way that makes the perfect solution (for us) possibly a combination of two of them. However, we can't afford that, and so I will have to make a compromise. This is why I need something that fits as closely as possible. Therefore it will likely be Fortinet or Palo Alto.
    Last edited by SJA; 3rd March 2014 at 12:23 PM.

  3. #18
    themightymrp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Leeds, West Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,220
    Thank Post
    216
    Thanked 226 Times in 195 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    We got a Palo Alto firewall with our Virgin package. So far I have to say it is very good! Not just hype but actually does the job. We run our filtering via Bloxx though so can't comment on that side of things.

    As mentioned earlier in the thread, some parts are locked out by Virgin but nothing that we really would need to access. I can get full control over the NAT and security settings plus the monitoring logs. Don't need anything else

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Palo Alto Networks
    By mrbios in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 5th August 2013, 11:33 AM
  2. Palo Alto
    By Oaktech in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10th August 2012, 10:05 AM
  3. Palo Alto 500, anyone using it?
    By ful56_uk in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th February 2012, 06:44 PM
  4. Alto Digital?
    By fafster in forum Bad Experiences
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27th October 2011, 08:24 PM
  5. Palo Alto Firewall
    By MrJon in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25th October 2010, 08:45 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •