+ Post New Thread
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 143
Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall Thread, Lightspeed vs Smoothwall in Technical; *Definitely* manually set it on key hardware ... I had to deal with this for over 40 schools when they ...
  1. #76

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,964
    Thank Post
    1,351
    Thanked 1,814 Times in 1,126 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    600
    *Definitely* manually set it on key hardware ... I had to deal with this for over 40 schools when they had new Cisco routers put in ... let's just say that there was a lot of frustration out there because of it.

  2. Thanks to GrumbleDook from:

    dhicks (26th February 2013)

  3. #77

    dhicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    5,663
    Thank Post
    1,263
    Thanked 786 Times in 683 Posts
    Rep Power
    237
    Quote Originally Posted by SchoolsBroadband View Post
    sounds like a duplex mismatch between the Sonicwall and Lightspeed IMO
    That's a good point - I'm fairly sure they tried that, but it's worth double-checking, thanks.

  4. #78

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North
    Posts
    1,841
    Thank Post
    25
    Thanked 91 Times in 71 Posts
    Rep Power
    51
    My SW renewal is up in June and although I have been a customer for 6 years I am thinking of jumping ship. The reporting isnt easy to read, the firewall logs are just baffling and the https stuff....geez. getting Skype through is a pain. Oh and their new support website is awful....sorry it is, there is hardly any articles on it and the search facility is pants. There, feel better now. On the positive side, the timed filtering is ace, especially for us in a boarding school, false positives are few and far between and its pretty much install and forget. My biggest issue now is it doesn't feel like its moved on, it still reminds me of smoothwall 1, a fanboys project. Yes the filtering is second to none but what I want is it to be easy to use.

    Onto lightspeed, can't comment. I have tried a few times to talk to them but they never get back....maybe its the filtering companies way. I don't like the idea of the client install, it having to fork out for a new firewall but if it does the job simpler and as effective as SW I will be tempted. Need a demo though.

    Ps. If SW are increasing their support costs for the same service then I can't see me staying loyal.

  5. Thanks to Simcfc73 from:

    Jollity (26th February 2013)

  6. #79

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    914
    Thank Post
    98
    Thanked 184 Times in 159 Posts
    Rep Power
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Simcfc73 View Post
    My SW renewal is up in June and although I have been a customer for 6 years I am thinking of jumping ship. The reporting isnt easy to read, the firewall logs are just baffling and the https stuff....geez. getting Skype through is a pain. Oh and their new support website is awful....sorry it is, there is hardly any articles on it and the search facility is pants. There, feel better now. On the positive side, the timed filtering is ace, especially for us in a boarding school, false positives are few and far between and its pretty much install and forget. My biggest issue now is it doesn't feel like its moved on, it still reminds me of smoothwall 1, a fanboys project. Yes the filtering is second to none but what I want is it to be easy to use.
    You have said what I and my manager have been thinking and why we ordered lightspeed today.

    We have been with Smoothwall coming up 3 years and feel very similar to how you do about it. As a filter it does the job well, in terms of reporting its a quagmire and it takes up more time than it should in administration.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simcfc73 View Post
    Onto lightspeed, can't comment. I have tried a few times to talk to them but they never get back....maybe its the filtering companies way. I don't like the idea of the client install, it having to fork out for a new firewall but if it does the job simpler and as effective as SW I will be tempted. Need a demo though.

    Ps. If SW are increasing their support costs for the same service then I can't see me staying loyal.
    I found the audit trail of logons and logoffs useful during our trial which you get with the client.

    I don't really see the big issue with the client install personally.

    As for spending on a new firewall, we could have kept our Smoothwall firewall but frankly it isn't even in the same league as the sonicwall device we trialled and subsequently purchased today.
    Last edited by RTFM; 26th February 2013 at 09:40 PM.

  7. #80

    john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    10,362
    Thank Post
    1,499
    Thanked 1,053 Times in 922 Posts
    Rep Power
    303
    As posted earlier on a new Firewall is in development for Smoothwall and a new reporting engine is also due as they have accepted that its not up to the required standards (sorry guys but you know it is as well as me!) and that is much better than the current one which is having its moments for some users as has been posted on here before. Having seem some bits of the new reporting system and talking to the developers it is going to be a major improvement and much quicker at processing data which it needs to be given the thirst for online resources.

    The new support site, must admit I am not a fan of it at all and I would go as far as saying it was a bad move IMHO, I absolutely hate it and dread having to use it (and I have to use some rotten "helpdesk" including one company that thinks a wordpress blog comment system is a "helpdesk"!!?).

    My past tickets which are useful sources of info for me are missing a lot of responses and details I found the other day when looking for some info that I knew was in an old case from ages ago, its unfriendly and unintuitive so I do think a try again is needed on that there are products much better out there to be used so I do think they got that wrong and should re-look at that, however I would prefer them to get more staff onto the phones and email support for everyone's benefit, but it could be a double edged sword that if we had the old system which had a lot of very good KBs (albeit dating due to the new systems and upgrades) when you dug through then you might not actually need to call up....

    (See I can also be critical of Smoothwall for those who keep saying all I ever do is praise them they don't get everything right it is how they respond when they get it wrong and how they work with customers over problems)

  8. Thanks to john from:

    Jollity (1st March 2013)

  9. #81
    Gaz
    Gaz is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    840
    Thank Post
    149
    Thanked 75 Times in 64 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    Agreed on the helpdesk front, its a complete waste of time, I ended up closing a support ticket that I made because i became so disheartened waiting for a reply, my account manager asked me to email her if I didn't get a reply in a few days, so I emailed her and she never replied to me. I really liked Smoothwall for the first year we used it, the support staff were nice and helpful and my account manager would call me up to see how I was getting on but now, I get the impression from the comments I read that they have forgotten about the end users. I just want Smoothwall to go back to the old days. We are due for renewal very soon and I have been paying close attention to this thread for an alternative, but I just wont have the time to try anything new so we will be with Smoothwall for another year, I really hope they get things sorted.

  10. #82

    john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    10,362
    Thank Post
    1,499
    Thanked 1,053 Times in 922 Posts
    Rep Power
    303
    Smoothwall have been honest and said they are putting more staff on support that will help once they start. Surprised that your account manager hasn't been in touch though that is not like them. Maybe worth dropping them another line to see if they can assist you further :-)

  11. #83
    Gaz
    Gaz is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    840
    Thank Post
    149
    Thanked 75 Times in 64 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    That issue resolved its self anyway but its more the point that they never got back to me that bothers me. Yeah I read the post about getting more support staff, in fact I predicted it due to the increase in support renewal, which will go towards new staff wages.
    I look forward to some more pleasant experiences with Smoothie.
    I am on my 4th account manager in nearly 3 years though lol, but I'm not sure if thats them or me.

  12. #84
    Valyyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    204
    Thank Post
    22
    Thanked 63 Times in 45 Posts
    Rep Power
    54
    Just wanted to pop in to add something - I had a sneak preview of some of the new Smoothwall UI at BETT and I was quite impressed! The log viewer can show live updates, as well as allowing you to pause it and show certain date/time ranges. It also lets you filter, sort and (I think) change the columns, which also apply when you unpause it, so you can very easily have the live logs only showing up entries that match attemps to get to edugeek.net or something. It's still a work in progress, but is looking good

  13. Thanks to Valyyn from:

    Jollity (27th February 2013)

  14. #85


    AMLightfoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    2,238
    Thank Post
    387
    Thanked 661 Times in 413 Posts
    Rep Power
    272
    Previous posters are correct in observing that the reporting system is no longer robust enough for the needs of our customers and we have invested a lot of development resource into developing a complete replacement - this is due to begin phased roll out in the next couple of months. At present I have no definitive dates but it is incoming.

  15. Thanks to AMLightfoot from:

    Gaz (27th February 2013)

  16. #86

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    13
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Does anyone use either smoothwall or lightspeed to shape traffic? What speed Internet are you shaping, how many students and is your solution effective?

    We have 10Mb leased line for 400 students in a boarding school. We are looking at both Lightspeed and Smoothwall. I think I prefer the Lightspeed solution, but I don't think it does the shaping so might be a no go.

    Cheers

  17. #87

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North
    Posts
    1,841
    Thank Post
    25
    Thanked 91 Times in 71 Posts
    Rep Power
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by boombah View Post
    Does anyone use either smoothwall or lightspeed to shape traffic? What speed Internet are you shaping, how many students and is your solution effective?

    We have 10Mb leased line for 400 students in a boarding school. We are looking at both Lightspeed and Smoothwall. I think I prefer the Lightspeed solution, but I don't think it does the shaping so might be a no go.

    Cheers
    One fo the things I may be looking at investing in is a new wireless system liek the meraki or the Ruckus stuff which does a bit of that. The demo I watched of the Meraki stuff showed ou could limit doesnloads on say youtube site or peer to peer sites.

  18. #88

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    914
    Thank Post
    98
    Thanked 184 Times in 159 Posts
    Rep Power
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by boombah View Post
    Does anyone use either smoothwall or lightspeed to shape traffic? What speed Internet are you shaping, how many students and is your solution effective?

    We have 10Mb leased line for 400 students in a boarding school. We are looking at both Lightspeed and Smoothwall. I think I prefer the Lightspeed solution, but I don't think it does the shaping so might be a no go.

    Cheers
    I wouldn't class what Smoothie does as traffic shaping, it does some bandwidth management but its not brilliant.

    Lightspeed does do traffic shaping but we havent used it in our trial and wont be in reality when it's installed.

    The Sonicwall firewall we have trialled and purchased does do full traffic shaping, you can do this by group, subnet, specific ip and against specific url's or just say 'this subnet receives this much bandwidth' etc. It's much more flexible and granular than either the lightspeed or smoothwall systems and very powerful (like i said though, I havent actually used the lightspeed offering so it's just an opinion from what i've seen of it which isn't a lot).

    Quote Originally Posted by Simcfc73 View Post
    One fo the things I may be looking at investing in is a new wireless system liek the meraki or the Ruckus stuff which does a bit of that. The demo I watched of the Meraki stuff showed ou could limit doesnloads on say youtube site or peer to peer sites.
    If you did bandwidth management / traffic shaping closer to the edge of your network (firewall or filter), it would affect all clients within including wireless devices....or i may be missing what the meraki / ruckus does over and above normal traffic shaping / bandwidth management.
    Last edited by RTFM; 27th February 2013 at 05:13 PM.

  19. #89
    Eappariello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    72
    Thank Post
    41
    Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    To make this subject easier to manage (for those who need simplicity), and to help protect those users actually working or completing online exams etc, the lightspeed appliance takes a different approach to bandwidth management.

    The appliance lets you set thresholds of line usage e.g 80%, then blocks new connections with a custom message, unless the user is going to categories in an exception list (i.e Education, Online Exams etc). As the appliance is a layer 2 bridge it inspects all TCP and UDP connections, so has the complete bandwidth picture rather than just WEB traffic.

    Its a 2 step setup.







    Quote Originally Posted by RTFM View Post
    I wouldn't class what Smoothie does as traffic shaping, it does some bandwidth management but its not brilliant.

    Lightspeed does do traffic shaping but we havent used it in our trial and wont be in reality when it's installed.

    The Sonicwall firewall we have trialled and purchased does do full traffic shaping, you can do this by group, url, subnet etc. It's much more flexible and granular than either the lightspeed or smoothwall systems (like i said though, I havent actually used the lightspeed offering so it's just an opinion from what i've seen of it which isn't a lot).

  20. 2 Thanks to Eappariello:

    Jollity (1st March 2013), RTFM (28th February 2013)

  21. #90

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    111
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    10
    Just to offer alternatives we use CpitalBytes (netsweeper) which is really good and includes AD integration, transparent proxy etc, header adaption for youtube schools all through a GUI (don't have a price yet as we are beta) and Barracuda also offer a solution which is £1750 for five years for our school of 600 pupils KS12 (not tried it but based on EMC tech apparently)

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Android Tablets vs. Smoothwall/Proxy
    By Gongalong in forum Netbooks, PDA and Phones
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10th July 2012, 12:18 PM
  2. Smoothwall Vs Sonicwall
    By SSFC in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 29th March 2011, 08:41 AM
  3. ISA vs SmoothWall
    By Haux in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 4th December 2009, 06:36 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •