+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall Thread, Palo Alto Networks in Technical; @ mrbios i dont know if this would be of any interest but we have done a few PaloAlto installs ...
  1. #16
    Net-Ctrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    203
    Thank Post
    46
    Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    @mrbios i dont know if this would be of any interest but we have done a few PaloAlto installs into education over the past six months, i could try and find one of them thats able to speak with you about the solution?

    Alternatively, we have Robert Needs, one of our engineers who is fully trained on the Palo solution and has a great knowledge base on the technical side, and Mark Power who is able to talk through all your sales options etc. Hopefully a combo of the two could help answer some questions you may have

  2. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    235
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    16
    I currently have 2 Palo Alto boxes running on my setup. They are the older 2020 models and not the newfangled 3000 or 5000 series. But essentially they all have the same basic settings.

    For a firewall it is top notch, allows for a great in depth configuration to allow only what you want in and our of your network as well as allowing certain users, regardless of where they are logging in from, higher or lower access to the internet and/or network. The Anti-Spam thing isn't such a big deal for us as we have a 3rd party doing that for us before the mails even make it to our system.

    There are a couple of drawbacks, but from what I have heard this is largely down to A. these lower level boxes we have and B. down to the amount of rules we have setup (203 just on the security rules). The problems I mentioned are very slow commit changes time, can take upwards of 5-10 minutes to apply changes. And some slow navigation of the web GUI, again down to the amount of rules we have.
    Although I will be over Christmas doing a tidy up of the rules and removing redundant ones. So hopefully it will pick up.

    Lastly, I will just say that it depends on what you want/need the box to do. If you don't need such tight control over your network traffic as well as being able to identify what kind of traffic it is and having that added layer of protection with the Anti-virus and Application threat detection, then you probably don't need a Palo Alto box and you will probably be able to get away with using a Equiinet Cachepilot or something like that.

  3. #18

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Irvine CA
    Posts
    2
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Excellent firewall, web filtering not as stellar.. doesn't deal with granulated controls of social networks, doesn't support YouTube for schools, etc...

  4. #19
    Net-Ctrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    203
    Thank Post
    46
    Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    If there is anything i can do to help regarding Palo or if you have any questions please feel free to let me know. We can set-up a tech call with an SE at Palo or look at getting some trial equipment out to you.

    If you're already dealing with someone, i apologise for the intrusion

    Ignore this post. Someone else has posted on my behalf already haha
    Last edited by Net-Ctrl; 2nd August 2013 at 05:04 PM.

  5. #20
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,650
    Thank Post
    164
    Thanked 217 Times in 200 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    Would be interested to hear about anyone using their Palo with Bloxx or Smoothwall hanging off it for web filtering, particularly if the filtering runs in transparent proxy mode...

  6. #21

    john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    10,513
    Thank Post
    1,493
    Thanked 1,050 Times in 919 Posts
    Rep Power
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by gshaw View Post
    Would be interested to hear about anyone using their Palo with Bloxx or Smoothwall hanging off it for web filtering, particularly if the filtering runs in transparent proxy mode...
    @Soulfish has as PA F/W with Smoothie filtering

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Palo Alto
    By Oaktech in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10th August 2012, 10:05 AM
  2. Palo Alto 500, anyone using it?
    By ful56_uk in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th February 2012, 06:44 PM
  3. Palo Alto Firewall
    By MrJon in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25th October 2010, 08:45 PM
  4. Network Printing
    By ninjabeaver in forum Windows
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 22nd August 2005, 08:28 PM
  5. School networks and aid to Africa. A comparison.
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 5th July 2005, 11:36 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •