How do you do....it? Thread, What do you exclude from antivirus scans? in Technical; I've had a few file servers fail in the last few years I have finally realised its probably be scanning ...
8th February 2008, 03:31 PM #1
What do you exclude from antivirus scans?
I've had a few file servers fail in the last few years I have finally realised its probably be scanning every single file on the network over and over again destroying the hard disk. By default Symantec auto protect scans everything on the file server and the statistics show millions of file read cycles.
So what do people exclude from the auto protect on their file servers? I have removed the roaming profiles which has made a massive difference but was also thinking of excluding doc and xls files. Is this a step too far? The only virus's we have had in the logs in the last 3 years are .exe and .dll ones so I'm hoping to still catch these.
8th February 2008, 03:56 PM #2
I very much doubt the constant scanning of your HDs from your AV app is the cause of your HD failures. There are a great deal of other factors to consider.
Originally Posted by ittech
Also if this was the case I would assume that servers and HDs all over the globe would be failing at a monster rate.
The only files I exclude from our daily scan are the ones which sometimes pull up a false positive. Everything gets scanned otherwise.
I would certainly say that removing .doc and .xls is a step too far. The majority of macro viruses are held within .doc files and there are quite a few .xls viruses out there too.
I would even go as far as stating that by removing the scanning of those files you are playing with fire.
8th February 2008, 04:08 PM #3
It's not if a hard disk will fail it's when....
Definatly don't exclude .doc or .xls from being scanned altogether as there is lots of virus potential with in these files (macro's are just the start).
8th February 2008, 05:18 PM #4
In my experience hard rives fail when they want to and usually when it is most inconvenient. I haven't heard AV being blamed for this before.
I'm with the others on this; exclude the bare minimum and don't exclude .doc and .xls!
8th February 2008, 06:29 PM #5
whats symantec like versus avast or nod32 or mcaffee like in terms of scanning or monitoring the file system for viruses in files etc ?
not sure if symantec av on a server is the same as what there client av apps are like ?
personally im not too keen on symantec products ( personal preference ) at least thus far.
8th February 2008, 06:54 PM #6
- Rep Power
I'm with you Gecko, I'm not a big fan of Symantec either.
I for one have never heard AV causing Hard Drive failures? As stated, don't exclude .doc and .xls!
Last edited by plock; 8th February 2008 at 07:08 PM.
8th February 2008, 07:02 PM #7
with you on the docs and xls and mdb's ( ms database crud lol )
Originally Posted by plock
8th February 2008, 07:09 PM #8
- Rep Power
Indeed - MDB's are a bloody nightmare... synchronisation failures! :P
Spelling correction in above post “head” to “heard”! hehe
By deano in forum Network and Classroom Management
Last Post: 10th January 2008, 12:36 PM
By TechSupp in forum General Chat
Last Post: 13th December 2007, 08:50 PM
By witch in forum General Chat
Last Post: 12th December 2007, 04:43 PM
By TechSupp in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 21st September 2007, 01:07 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)