+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
Hardware Thread, Leasing Computers - Opinions and experiences? Stone Group in particular. in Technical; Originally Posted by ben604 Sorry guys, can we keep this to actual opinions of the leasing and end of lease ...
  1. #16

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,343
    Thank Post
    525
    Thanked 2,597 Times in 2,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    888
    Quote Originally Posted by ben604 View Post
    Sorry guys, can we keep this to actual opinions of the leasing and end of lease return-the-equipment procedures!

    We've had the go-ahead to lease if we want, we just need to know what we can expect when returning the equipment.

    Thanks for your input so far.
    I don't think you can really get a crowd-sourced opinion on this sort of thing. You *really* need to pass any lease documents through a lawyer before signing them to make sure they won't sting you. Someone might have signed a lease with company x last week, and you go to sign one next week but the lease terms may be entirely different.

  2. #17

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,821
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,140 Times in 1,036 Posts
    Rep Power
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    I don't think you can really get a crowd-sourced opinion on this sort of thing. You *really* need to pass any lease documents through a lawyer before signing them to make sure they won't sting you. Someone might have signed a lease with company x last week, and you go to sign one next week but the lease terms may be entirely different.
    Your LEA will have a legal team who you probably have an SLA with - they will deal with reading the contracts etc beforehand if needs be.

  3. #18

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    10,035
    Thank Post
    1,373
    Thanked 1,859 Times in 1,153 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    609
    This is not a comment on any suppliers mentioned in this thread already (in fact I am pretty sure that some of the areas below are not too much of a concern with those mentioned.

    The areas that need careful checking on any agreement include (but are not limited to)
    • penalties due to the condition of the equipment - things affecting this can include cosmetic, external damage; the use of security marking (including etching, tamper proof labels, paint / nail varnish / smart water), internal damage (including unauthorised repairs, changes of hardware, dust), screen burn, etc
    • cost of shipping equipment back to lease owner
    • insurance cover - ie the level of cover, the amount the equipment is covered for, whether depreciation is allowed on the value of assets under the cover, etc
    • agreed maintenance - you may find that the lease arrangement also requires an additional support arrangement which might be able to be met by the school using existing staff or support arrangement, but might also be able to be met by the lease owner or an associated company ... if you have to agree a level of support or maintenance just make sure that you can meet it and document it as you go along otherwise they might claim damage penalties as you have reduced the resale value.
    • who owns the lease should the lease owner go under (liability of passed on debts), who can call in the debt (ie the banks, parent companies, etc) and who can initiate the break of the lease at an earlier period (ie can you get out early, can the firm the kit is from pull it all back in and at what notice ... and can the financer / bank cut the lease early)


    Not a complete list but some of the most common areas to have a look at. Most of the above gets covered when LA / Academy finance folk look at the lease arrangement.
    The operational stuff (damage / maintenance / etc) is stuff you need to be aware of though ... if your school policy is to use tamper-proof labels or etching to security mark and the lease arrangement doesn't allow this you have to make an assessment about whether the damage penalty per machine is more than the increased insurance premium you might get for not marking them.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 177
    Last Post: 7th July 2014, 01:56 PM
  2. Ericom - Remote access - Your opinions and experiences?
    By tj2419 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17th February 2012, 09:29 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10th September 2010, 08:27 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20th February 2007, 12:41 AM
  5. Security Groups in 2003
    By SpuffMonkey in forum Windows
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20th July 2006, 12:18 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •