Hardware Thread, HP DL 160 G6 as remote desktop server farm in Technical; Thinking for cost reasons and building in redundancy and load balancing, maybe thinking of using above entry level servers ( ...
9th May 2012, 10:58 PM #1
HP DL 160 G6 as remote desktop server farm
Thinking for cost reasons and building in redundancy and load balancing, maybe thinking of using above entry level servers ( 2 processors and more RAM) might do the job instead of getting more expensive DL360/DL380s.
Would having SATA cripple RDS performance?
IDG Tech News
9th May 2012, 11:02 PM #2
What are the full specs and how many users please?
9th May 2012, 11:09 PM #3
If you going to use Sata get some SSD's - even entry level ones and then if they die just keep a spare and be prepared to rebuild it (perhaps keep an image of it to restore quickly if fails)
but all depends on numbers.
Have you thought about proper VDI softwares?>
9th May 2012, 11:09 PM #4
A couple of years ago we just decided to put in desktop class hardware with SSD's. Saved a fortune, and as you say has redundancy and load balancing built in.
Cheapskate Server Farm
Thanks to CyberNerd from:
9th May 2012, 11:10 PM #5
Looking at dual e5606, 64gb of RAM. Ideally 120 users per server(they would probably use published apps like Word Excel)
Will be running win 2008 x64
Have thought about using consumer SSD, since its a RDS server we could always MDT this for recovery. Just figuring how easy they are to fit into DL160(maybe through PCI card?)
Looking at VDI as well, but more on the Remote FX side for the future (ie to run SIMS discovery)
Last edited by MrWu; 9th May 2012 at 11:14 PM.
9th May 2012, 11:21 PM #6
You should be able to get some caddy's to fit the drives into the machines. I'm shortly going to start the VCP and VCP-DT courses so if you look at vmware for the VDI let me know. It can do remote FX using its PCoIP technology. I've not tried Sims Discover via it though!
EDIT: I stole the SSD idea from @CyberNerd
9th May 2012, 11:27 PM #7
Brilliant, will bear that in mind.
Also would you bother putting SSDs on say RAID 1?
Cybernerd, just digesting your thread, awesome setup!
Last edited by MrWu; 9th May 2012 at 11:28 PM.
9th May 2012, 11:31 PM #8
TBH Wouldn't bother IMHO - Just build the Host - clone the SSD to the other and if one fails stick other drive in and re-join to domain and you back up and running. There is still lots of yes vs no out there about SSD's in raid.
9th May 2012, 11:56 PM #9
thanks, it has worked pretty well so far.
Originally Posted by MrWu
We've had one hardware failure in the couple of years it has been running (BSOD). We didn't bother fixing it just removed the server from the farm as we have enough capacity and will probably renew it all within a year.
11th July 2012, 05:08 PM #10
KEMP has several low cost load balancers in it's range. You might like to take a look at the LM-2200, LM-2600 as they may suit your needs.
By MrWu in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 7th March 2012, 08:06 PM
By pettit87 in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
Last Post: 27th October 2010, 01:57 AM
By albertwt in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
Last Post: 24th March 2010, 01:42 AM
By russdev in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 16th November 2005, 10:07 PM
Last Post: 12th September 2005, 05:52 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)