Hardware Thread, Best external hard drive backup solution? in Technical; Hi,
Here at our primary school we are currently using a tape drive to back up our information but this ...
-
8th May 2012, 08:56 AM #1 Best external hard drive backup solution?
Hi,
Here at our primary school we are currently using a tape drive to back up our information but this is proving to be slow and we get intermittent errors with it. Even though this is a good enough backup solution we're looking at changing it to a more convenient hard drive backup solution.
What would be recommended for this kind of thing? I was thinking some kind of multiple hard drive external HDD bay might do the job? Perhaps with 5 HDD's? Anyone know of a good solution to this without it being too expensive?
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
8th May 2012, 09:01 AM #2 Go for a QNAP device? There's some good offers on at the moment. We use one and I've had no problems with it.
-
Thanks to tech_guy from:
marsdenprimary (8th May 2012)
-
8th May 2012, 09:27 AM #3 
Originally Posted by
tech_guy
Go for a QNAP device? There's some good offers on at the moment. We use one and I've had no problems with it.
Hey thanks for this
Is there any particular brand you'd recommend?
-
-
8th May 2012, 09:41 AM #4 I'd be careful if switching away from tape. Tape often forces the good practice of cycling full backups (keeping last weeks, last months, six months) with daily incrementals. With disc some folks seem to think that a 'copy' of their data, updated every night, is OK. That might save you from a disc failure but when you find you have been 'backing up' a corrupt file and need to try and track back to when it was good, you will need more than a copy. Tape still gives the best value in a robust backup strategy (IMO).
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:03 AM #5 
Originally Posted by
pcstru
I'd be careful if switching away from tape. Tape often forces the good practice of cycling full backups (keeping last weeks, last months, six months) with daily incrementals. With disc some folks seem to think that a 'copy' of their data, updated every night, is OK. That might save you from a disc failure but when you find you have been 'backing up' a corrupt file and need to try and track back to when it was good, you will need more than a copy. Tape still gives the best value in a robust backup strategy (IMO).
What I thought might work though is using the same system but with hard drives... Using a full backup cycle. Daily and a monthly Friday backup. Wouldn't this be a good method? So the server literally backs up to drive one on a Monday, two on a Tuesday etc... and when it gets to Friday it backs up to four separate folders on the drive depending on the week... is this possible?
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:18 AM #6 
Originally Posted by
pcstru
I'd be careful if switching away from tape. Tape often forces the good practice of cycling full backups (keeping last weeks, last months, six months) with daily incrementals. With disc some folks seem to think that a 'copy' of their data, updated every night, is OK. That might save you from a disc failure but when you find you have been 'backing up' a corrupt file and need to try and track back to when it was good, you will need more than a copy. Tape still gives the best value in a robust backup strategy (IMO).
I would have thought most people migrating from tape to d2d are using the same s/w they used with tape and just changing the target to be a disk array somewhere therefore the same rotation scheme will still be used?
Discuss!
Ben
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:19 AM #7 We have off-site backups, tape, and NAS solutions here - not that we're paranoid or anything 
The QNAP we have is a TS-410. There's a good offer going on Amazon at the moment for the TS-412 (you'll have to purchase your drives separately):
QNAP-TS-412
At this price I'm tempted for getting one for use at home.
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:20 AM #8 I've been playing with Iomega devices recently - they seem ok.
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:27 AM #9 4 QNAPs here, love them. They are currently doing our backups, hosting our intranet via Joomla, internal Wiki, internal Picasa style photo software.
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:27 AM #10 I would have just used a system of plugging in a hard drive at the end of the day then the following day swapping it for another but a self-enclosed system seems to make more sense. That way it can be in a secure location and i won't need to swap them about all the time...
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:28 AM #11 
Originally Posted by
Danp
4 QNAPs here, love them. They are currently doing our backups, hosting our intranet via Joomla, internal Wiki, internal Picasa style photo software.
This sounds like a great setup!! Would you be able to give me some kind of guide how to setup something similar?
x
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:34 AM #12 I can, buy a QNAP, we have 4 x TS-439 Pro II+
Once plugged into network and setup, very easy, you can setup webserver, iTunes sharing etc.
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:35 AM #13 
Originally Posted by
plexer
I would have thought most people migrating from tape to d2d are using the same s/w they used with tape and just changing the target to be a disk array somewhere therefore the same rotation scheme will still be used?
Some are, some aren't, but even the ones that switched in a disc array, may now have a compromised strategy. With tape, your rolling 6 month full backup is on it's own set of tapes hopefully sitting in a fire safe, off site. If you just replaced the tapes with a disc array then your weekly, monthly, 6 monthly yearly and all your incremental are sitting on one device. That seems like a lot of eggs in one basket and the cost of disc vs tape tends to make people adopt those compromises.
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:36 AM #14 
Originally Posted by
pcstru
With tape, your rolling 6 month full backup is on it's own set of tapes hopefully sitting in a fire safe, off site
How many schools properly off-site vault their tapes?
Ben
-
-
8th May 2012, 10:37 AM #15 
Originally Posted by
pcstru
Some are, some aren't, but even the ones that switched in a disc array, may now have a compromised strategy. With tape, your rolling 6 month full backup is on it's own set of tapes hopefully sitting in a fire safe, off site. If you just replaced the tapes with a disc array then your weekly, monthly, 6 monthly yearly and all your incremental are sitting on one device. That seems like a lot of eggs in one basket and the cost of disc vs tape tends to make people adopt those compromises.
Perhaps if the disks can be removed to a secure and fireproof location every week though- wouldn't this be just as effective?
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By googlemad in forum Hardware
Replies: 0
Last Post: 23rd May 2008, 10:03 AM
-
By rpycroft in forum Hardware
Replies: 16
Last Post: 29th January 2008, 04:55 PM
-
By aliv25 in forum Windows
Replies: 11
Last Post: 27th September 2007, 02:39 PM
-
By ranj in forum Hardware
Replies: 11
Last Post: 4th June 2007, 01:47 PM
-
By SimpleSi in forum Hardware
Replies: 4
Last Post: 29th January 2007, 01:48 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules