Hardware Thread, Storage Advice in Technical; Hi all!
Not sure if this was the right place, so feel free to move it mods if it isnt!
10th June 2011, 08:29 AM #1
10th June 2011, 08:51 AM #2
12 600GB SAS drives? If you *need* the performance, I'd be amazed.
In your spec : "We are looking for a storage solution that can integrate with all of the above systems in a simple, easy to manage way. The system needs to have at least a basic level of fault tolerance as well as the ability to grow to significant size through upgrades/add-ons etc."
So it depends what you mean by "basic level of fault tolerance". I'd presume RAID, redundant power supplies and dual (or more) GB Nic?
Look at some of the iSCSI capable NAS type devices out there. My preference is thecus boxes (i4500's or 8800 pro) - I've had good experience with them. Others seem to like like QNAP. A slighlty more expensive solution might be the Enhance Technology UltraStor RS8 IP-4, much the same kind of thing but with 4 GB NIC's. Bare boxes, the thecus i4500's cost around £600, the 8800's £1500 while the RS8 will knock you back £2400 ish. You can probably buy several of them for the price of the HP and you can then replace them every year for the price of support on the HP.
10th June 2011, 08:59 AM #3
How many clients is this lot serving? That way, you can target the storage at what its being used for, rather than the perceived server backend use.
10th June 2011, 09:08 AM #4
- Rep Power
Thanks for the replies.
This is serving around 375 computers at the moment, although it's been mentioned adding 30+ more this summer.
As for the fault tolerance, yes basically redundant of most things like RAID, PSU, networking, etc. I didn't want to be too specific with the supplier as I wanted to see more what they recommended.
I like the sound of those NAS boxes, and I agree the amount of money quoted for the HP kit has made this project a little too expensive!
10th June 2011, 09:25 AM #5
We are using an 8800 Pro to service network storage areas for around 3000+ users, probably no more than 800 concurrently. The storage is provisioned as iSCSI to a virtualised W2008 server which manages the shares. We also use two i4500's to serve out backup datastores for the VMware hosts but they also host some lower grade (not so critical), live VM's. We do not see performance bottlenecks on these devices with enterprise grade SATA drives.
Originally Posted by BaccyNet
I'll be adding another 8800 pro in the summer to act as a mirror, synced two or three times a day to the primary - just for faster recovery if the worst happens (we do already back up to tape overnight but restoring a few TB would take a day or two). We did for a while host VM's running SQL server and exchange on the i4500's - again with no performance hit but for those applications we really want some live mirroring capability which these devices don't yet offer (but you are talking fairly serious money to put in something that does (or perhaps some really clever work either with windows shadow volumes or cleverly managed VM snapshots - something I hope to figure out eventually!)).
10th June 2011, 09:54 AM #6
- Rep Power
Here are some tips:
Go with cheaper 'near line SAS' disks, but a significant amount of read cache (32gb or so), this will save a lot of money and increase capacity and performance. You only really need the high rpm disks for intense database access.
Get a unit that supports double parity RAID (raid 6) as there are problems running RAID 5 on large arrays. Make sure the machine has a good amount of battery backed write cache to overcome the write penalties associated with parity based RAiD.
Get a unit you can manage easily, there are even windows based units on the market with starwind software which enables some nifty features, including high availability clustering. These are really easy to manage.
Make sure you get some advanced redundancy features, redundant power, fans, nics, remember that if this unit fails, everything stops working (unless you get a high availability cluster).
Consider the virtualisation support of the SAN, you might want to do some hyperV clustering or VMware in the future.
<Edited by Dos_Box>
Last edited by Dos_Box; 10th June 2011 at 10:32 AM.
By Trapper in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Last Post: 2nd September 2010, 10:22 PM
By speckytecky in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 10th September 2009, 02:09 PM
By mossj in forum Educational IT Jobs
Last Post: 14th May 2009, 09:32 PM
By wesleyw in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 8th December 2008, 10:49 AM
By gwendes in forum Windows
Last Post: 4th January 2008, 10:07 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)