+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Hardware Thread, Exchange server sizing? 940 users, pred OWA in Technical; Reading up on Exchange server sizing, most of the guides are aimed at scaling for corporate Outlook users, so I ...
  1. #1


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the server room, with the lead pipe.
    Posts
    4,534
    Thank Post
    271
    Thanked 752 Times in 590 Posts
    Rep Power
    218

    Exchange server sizing? 940 users, pred OWA

    Reading up on Exchange server sizing, most of the guides are aimed at scaling for corporate Outlook users, so I wondered if I could pick someones brains? Especially with regard to RAID setup and disks

    The server will be just a mail server.

    Running Exchange 2003 or 2007 + av & spam filtering (double-checking rbc filtering, rather than primary filter). It'll also be providing remote access to mail via OWA.

    940 mailboxes, 870 of which will be accessed via OWA only, the rest a mix of Outlook and OWA. Up to 300 users in school could use mail at the same time.

    Out of school, I'm not sure about - we have 90% of kids using Moodle while at home, so chances are they'll be looking at email regularly as well.

    Spec wise:
    I prefer Dell (everything else is), but not a deal-breaker.
    Dual cpus - I know exchange can make good use of them, needed?
    Memory: 4GB?
    Disks and RAID setup - not sure, a corp guide for a "small" (100 users) server was:

    OS and Exchange Software on a RAID 1 (would do anyway)
    Database on a separate RAID 5 or 1
    Transaction logs on another RAID 1

    That's six disks :? and seems a bit overkill.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    54
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Exchange server sizing? 940 users, pred OWA

    Unless you're running hundreds of message / minute you don't need to worry too much about putting your transaction logs on their own RAID-1. partition the system drive into two logical drives and stick the transaction logs there instead. Databases would be better on a RAID-5, but it's more important to make sure your drives are large enough to handle the users you've got. 3x145GB SAS drives would probably be fine for your databases - it'll give you about 200MB per mailbox.

    go for a single dual-core CPU rather than two seperate CPUs, just to save money. core2Duos (or the Xeons based on them) would be best. 2GB memory will be fine.

    Our first exchange server was a poweredge 700, P4 2.8, 1GB RAM, 3x250GB hard drives in one RAID-5 set. It served about 600 mailboxes without ever breaking a sweat.

  3. #3


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the server room, with the lead pipe.
    Posts
    4,534
    Thank Post
    271
    Thanked 752 Times in 590 Posts
    Rep Power
    218

    Re: Exchange server sizing? 940 users, pred OWA

    Thanks, I thought it would be overkill, but it's nice to check before you make expensive purchases.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    80
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Exchange server sizing? 940 users, pred OWA

    If you are going Exchange 2007 - then 4GB would be my recommendation. It only runs on 64bit so past experiences of Exchange 2003 will be a little different.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 23rd November 2007, 08:24 AM
  2. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 18th October 2007, 01:09 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2nd May 2007, 07:55 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd February 2007, 12:26 PM
  5. Exchange AD users and computers
    By browolf in forum Windows
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th December 2006, 10:59 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •