+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Hardware Thread, Another EEE competitor - And this one looks GOOD in Technical; Looks like MSI are breaking in to the sub laptop area. From the article the specs seem to be.... 1.6ghz ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    172
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Another EEE competitor - And this one looks GOOD

    Looks like MSI are breaking in to the sub laptop area. From the article the specs seem to be....

    1.6ghz Intel Atom CPU
    1GB RAM
    SSD
    10" Screen
    XP

    And wait for it.....185!

    Full article : Computer Shopper: News: The stunning laptop that undercuts the Eee PC

  2. Thanks to m1ddy from:

    kmount (3rd April 2008)

  3. #2


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    4,688
    Thank Post
    352
    Thanked 794 Times in 714 Posts
    Rep Power
    346
    That looks beautiful.

  4. #3

    Ric_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,590
    Thank Post
    109
    Thanked 762 Times in 593 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    It does look nice in hte pictures and the size sounds like it would be perfect for me... I've only held off geeting an eeePC becaus of the 7" screen.

    I wouldn't want one with Windows on though

  5. #4

    Domino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bromley
    Posts
    4,126
    Thank Post
    215
    Thanked 1,255 Times in 786 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    505
    ahem, they say they'll sell for "about $370", which sure as much converts into 180squid.

    doesn't mean we'll get it for that price though......

    and as ric has said, these little things would be much happier with linux

  6. #5
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,928
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    What i want to know is what is the difference between a 1.6ghz Atom processor and 1.2ghz Core solo or duo ULV processor....

    Can one processor not cover both the 8.9inch ultraportables like the eee and the up to 12.1 inch ultraportables that at the moment use the ULV.

    Is it more than Intel just forcing the Atom line on manufacturers because they've rolled out this Atom platform and all the marketing hype.

  7. #6


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,202
    Thank Post
    442
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power
    339
    Interesting article here:
    Microsoft extends XP through 2010 for ultra-low-cost laptops | The Industry Standard

    MS are extending sales of XP to 2010 to accommodate these devices

  8. #7

    Ric_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,590
    Thank Post
    109
    Thanked 762 Times in 593 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    @Torledo: AFAIK the Atom is simply the new name for the ULV processors using the 45nm fabrication process. See Intel Atom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for a little more info.

  9. #8

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,803
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 583 Times in 504 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224
    Anyone seen any benchmarks though?

  10. #9
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,928
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Ric_ View Post
    @Torledo: AFAIK the Atom is simply the new name for the ULV processors using the 45nm fabrication process. See Intel Atom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for a little more info.
    I don't think it is Ric, i've done a little digging trying to look beyond the plethora of intel codenames. It appears the ULV and LV range is to continue with the new penryn 45nm core 2 duo designs. They plan on releasing a 1.4ghz ULV that will draw less power than previous ULV's while designed to work with the forthcoming montevina chipset and have a faster FSB.

    I suspect Atom doesn't have enough juice for the performance ultraportable market. Hence they need single and dual core ULV's for machines like the dell D430. Asus and nokia have created two new classifications of computer, and i think Atom is there specifically for laptops like the eee and MIDs like the N800. Interestingly the wikipedia article suggests that Atom won't go down into the smartphone market, but i think the plan is take on ARM in that category eventually.

    In the market it targets the biggest think for Atom to do is very low power consumption with fanless operation and loooong battery life.

    One of the execs at ARM basically said Intel have talked about Atom processor power consumption, but they won't talk about chipset power envelope as that draws power aswell. Maybe ARM have got both those nailed whereas intel haven't as of yet with the atom design.

  11. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    1,042
    Thank Post
    226
    Thanked 63 Times in 56 Posts
    Rep Power
    29
    The more competition the better it'll be for everyone Looks very promising though at those figures.

  12. #11

    plexer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    13,343
    Thank Post
    624
    Thanked 1,584 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Rep Power
    414
    Looks like a lovely little machine will be interesting to see how it performs but it would also make a lot of sense as a vle web platform access device perfect for our MIS system.

    Ben

  13. #12

    Ric_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,590
    Thank Post
    109
    Thanked 762 Times in 593 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    From a little more reading, the Atom supports the full Core instruction set but is a new architecture of processor. Benchmarks seem to put the 1.6GHz Atom at about the same processing power as a 900MHz Celeron-D which isn't fantastically fast but is sufficient for what it is intended to do. Power management is meant to be excellent too.

    Incidentally, ZDNet reports that the eeePC will start shipping with Atom processors in May (see Asus Eee to get Intel's Atom processor - ZDNet.co.uk ).
    Last edited by Ric_; 7th April 2008 at 03:31 PM. Reason: extras

  14. #13
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,650
    Thank Post
    164
    Thanked 217 Times in 200 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    Looks very tasty, screen being the major difference - have to wonder how they're gonna manage it as I thought the screen was the major cost component? Just hope the price doesn't shoot up as it usually does after we get excited by doing a $$$ to conversion!

  15. #14
    gaz350's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rutland, east.leicestershire :P
    Posts
    579
    Thank Post
    47
    Thanked 49 Times in 41 Posts
    Rep Power
    28
    and another from HP

  16. #15
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,928
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by Ric_ View Post
    From a little more reading, the Atom supports the full Core instruction set but is a new architecture of processor. Benchmarks seem to put the 1.6GHz Atom at about the same processing power as a 900MHz Celeron-D which isn't fantastically fast but is sufficient for what it is intended to do. Power management is meant to be excellent too.

    Incidentally, ZDNet reports that the eeePC will start shipping with Atom processors in May (see Asus Eee to get Intel's Atom processor - ZDNet.co.uk ).
    That's very interesting news regarding the eee. The atom platform should improve the battery life....which i think is poor for an ultraportablee atm.

    First i've heard about eee continuing to provide a linux os. The higher specced follow up models to the 8gb 900 sound like fantastic buys. Hopefully long battery life, 8.9 inch led screen and 16gb SSD...if it comes in at 350 quid that would be a pretty impressive package.
    Near unbeatable....especially if HP stick with the miniscule 6.9inch with their mini notebook.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. HP's sub-notebook a EeePC competitor?
    By webman in forum IT News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 25th February 2008, 03:50 PM
  2. why so good
    By callumtuckey in forum General Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 7th January 2007, 06:39 PM
  3. Good or Bad?
    By Gatt in forum Educational IT Jobs
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 5th October 2006, 03:23 PM
  4. This looks good
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 9th May 2006, 11:36 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •