![]() | Register | FAQ | Members | Social Groups | User Map | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Hardware
Hardware forum sponsored by |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search Thread | Language |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #1 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | Thanks |
| |
| | #2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | In reference to the OSI model, it's kind of a definition of a switch that it operates at layer 2. Yes you can get ones that do inter vlan routing bumping them up to layer 3 (I think that's right?) too, but seeing as switches work on MAC addressing it already is at layer two. Are you finding any issues with bandwidth etc that might warrant an upgrade? If you're not finding any problems then I personally wouldn't see the need to upgrade. Why fix something that's not broke? |
| |
| | #3 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Alcester, Warwickshire
Posts: 1,211
Thanks: 60
Thanked 121 Times in 99 Posts
Rep Power: 26 | We use FS726s as our stock switch, along with a couple of gigabit backbones. It's fine for everything we've thrown at it. If you want VLANs and 802.1x authentication, use the managed version FSM726 and stackable FSM726TS. |
| |
| | #4 |
![]() | If it works, and does what you want it to don't change it. Z |
| |
| | #5 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: I'll be back in Madchester before you knows it
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 153
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | It's hardly a representative view but we have one of these switches as a hot spare. It gives us nothing but trouble but at least it's there should it be needed. If you are looking for a good quality L2 alternative to this switch at a reasonable price point, consider the GSM7224. We have these for all our edge switches and have no issues. You should really be using L2 managed switches anyway according to BECTA and I pretty much agree with them on that score.. |
| |
| | #6 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | Thanks for all your comments. I think as the network begins to grow I will look at upgrading the switches, to a more advanced switches. |
| |
| | #7 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Reading, Berkshire
Posts: 1,371
Thanks: 33
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 12 | Quote:
We don't have the funding to replace working switches, but will take the opportunity to "buy better" whenever we do need a new switch (e.g. network growth or hardware failure) | |
| |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Netgear GSM7224 switch not working with wireless router | mullet_man | Hardware | 4 | 08-10-2007 04:34 PM |
| New Netgear switch into existing VLAN | mullet_man | Networks | 0 | 20-09-2007 02:32 PM |
| Dieing Netgear Switch but which HP to replace it with? | DSapseid | Networks | 18 | 19-07-2007 10:40 AM |
| Netgear WAPs | RoyG | Networks | 7 | 26-02-2007 02:03 PM |
| Tags |
| netgear, network, switch, switches |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search Thread |
|
|








