View Poll Results: SATA or SAS drives?

Voters
8. This poll is closed
  • SAS

    7 87.50%
  • SATA

    1 12.50%
+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Hardware Thread, SAS Vs SATA in Servers, whats your opinion? in Technical; Hey Guys, Im looking into buying a new rack server for our school. It states it can take either SAS ...
  1. #1
    Harry_Greatorex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Burgess Hill
    Posts
    64
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    0

    Cool SAS Vs SATA in Servers, whats your opinion?

    Hey Guys,

    Im looking into buying a new rack server for our school. It states it can take either SAS or SATA HDD's, and if we buy the drives with the server, we can only get 146Gb SAS drives. We are looking at SATA drives with higher capacity from another supplier as this server will be used for virtualisation. And is RAID 5 an option with SATA?

    So...i want to know peoples opinions, the pros and cons of having SATA or SAS drives in a server. List below! Also, vote on what you prefer, SAS or SATA!

    Thanks Guys!

    Harry

  2. #2
    Gaz
    Gaz is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Preston
    Posts
    931
    Thank Post
    167
    Thanked 80 Times in 69 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Where are you buying it from that only allows 146Gb SAS drives? Have you considered SSD's?

  3. #3

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,530
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,648 Times in 2,049 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    925
    SAS drives are faster and more reliable.

    I would be looking for new suppliers if they can only get you 146GB SAS drives, or if they only offer you SATA. You can get 1.2TB SAS drives now, for example.

  4. #4
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,002
    Thank Post
    983
    Thanked 477 Times in 398 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    98
    I'd go for SSD's if you don't need that much storage.

    We use them in all our servers now over a SATA connection and they work great, not to mention being far more reliable than traditional spinning disks.

    Since we upgraded to SSD's, the interface has become pretty irrelevant.

  5. #5


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,811
    Thank Post
    262
    Thanked 2,969 Times in 2,183 Posts
    Rep Power
    847
    Quote Originally Posted by Gaz View Post
    Have you considered SSDs?
    +1. SSDs will be considerably faster than any SAS HDD.

    Quote Originally Posted by zag View Post
    Since we upgraded to SSDs, the interface has become irrelevant.
    I wouldn't quite go that far. We will always need something faster like NVMe PCIe SSDs.

    www.anandtech.com/show/8104/intel-ssd-dc-p3700-review-the-pcie-ssd-transition-begins-with-nvme
    Last edited by Arthur; 5th June 2014 at 05:22 PM.

  6. #6

    Norphy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Harpenden
    Posts
    2,584
    Thank Post
    59
    Thanked 371 Times in 287 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Rep Power
    134
    Quote Originally Posted by Harry_Greatorex View Post
    And is RAID 5 an option with SATA?
    The interface on the disk is irrelevant to the RAID level that you can use. As long as your controller supports it, you can use any disk.

    However, RAID 5 should not be used any more. Magnetic disks are just too big. Should one fail, the recovery time is very long and the amount of stress on the disks is increased considerably while the array is recovering. This makes it more likely that one of the other disks could fail and then bang goes your data. Ideally, you should be using RAID 6 at a minimum but preferably RAID 10 or 60.

    Or drop RAID entirely and use something along the lines of ZFS or Storage Spaces.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Southend-On-Sea
    Posts
    79
    Thank Post
    14
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    6
    I would say Intel Enterprise SATA SSDs or a PCIe SSD if your in a school environment because if you don't get the budget to replace the server they are in when it fails out of warrant you can temporally put them in a desktop where as you cant do that with SAS

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    870
    Thank Post
    59
    Thanked 133 Times in 111 Posts
    Rep Power
    77
    Totally depends on the workload and intended use of the server.
    Also depends upon how much storage you need and how many hard disks you're going to have in the server.

    Generally speaking SAS drives will be faster, more reliable and more expensive.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    674
    Thank Post
    28
    Thanked 78 Times in 73 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    SAS controllers can use work with both SAS and SATA drives SATA Controller cannot iirc.
    unless you need a biblical amount of storage/on a tighter budget i would go with SAS, as others have said SSD is an option.
    out of interest what rack server are you looking at purchasing?

  10. #10

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    6,515
    Thank Post
    627
    Thanked 1,173 Times in 900 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    524
    SSD through and through regardless of interface. As above, SATA works on SAS interfaces (but not vice-versa) so it may be good to use SSD for OS partitions and SATA spindles (enterprise level, same MTBF rates as SAS but generally slower) for mass storage if required. But with the disruptive pricing coming from SSD providers (Crucial MX100) and stonking warranties with pricing to match (Sandisk pro) maybe a month's wait will out a far better overall choice.

  11. #11


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,414
    Thank Post
    184
    Thanked 356 Times in 285 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    Wouldn't touch SATA RAID 5 with a bargepole for the reasons outlined. As said we need to know what you are going to be using the server for. But... SAS RAID 10 is what all of our servers use, apart from the backup servers which are SATA raid 6.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 6th December 2011, 03:00 PM
  2. SAS or SATA on ML115 server and QNAP
    By duxbuz in forum Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26th February 2010, 12:48 PM
  3. SAS or SATA 4 Servers
    By owen1978 in forum Hardware
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 13th January 2010, 06:38 AM
  4. What is your opinion of IBM servers?
    By SYNACK in forum Hardware
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 14th April 2009, 01:03 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 8th January 2007, 09:43 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •