+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Hardware Thread, HP Vs IBM in Technical; I have just this morning had a quote for equivalent IBM and HP servers. I was amazed to see that ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Lightbulb HP Vs IBM

    I have just this morning had a quote for equivalent IBM and HP servers. I was amazed to see that IBM came out cheaper. Now since my first day working in IT support (7 Years Ago) I have only ever worked with HP servers. There support is amazing and I could not find any reason to think about moving away until now.

    I will say both servers where with 4 hour response hardware support. Also the difference in price was just over 800.00

    What I was looking for is if anyone has had and good or bad experiences with ether products. If they could share it here to try and get a sense of if I would like to change.

  2. #2

    ICTDirect_Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ribchester
    Posts
    1,702
    Thank Post
    307
    Thanked 311 Times in 247 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    157
    Whilst I can't speak for the newst HP / IBM kit, we do see thousands of servers from both manufacturers that are between 2 and five years old.

    From those machines the HP servers have a FAR lower failure rate compared to the IBMs, unless something has changed recently I'd say stick with HP.

    If you'd like me to drop you some very tempting pricing for our refurb HP server's to use as comparison I'd be happy to. I'm sure I can get a competitive bundle with a decent warranty that should look nice!: )

  3. #3
    detjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    356
    Thank Post
    13
    Thanked 47 Times in 39 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Not that this is necessarily anything to go by, but ...

    My opinion of IBM hardware changed when working there, and I discovered they prefer to use Intel CPU's to their own and HP for pretty much all other hardware.
    IBM are great at R&D but I'd rather stick with HP hardware. And I agree, HP support is fantastic - that alone can make it worthwhile.

  4. #4
    rickypike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    91
    Thank Post
    15
    Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    +1 for HP Hardware here too, fantastic support and ultra reliable. We run all HP kit (Blade Servers, Switches, SAN etc) - 0 downtime in 3 years!

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Old HP or IBM kit????
    By Millgate in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 25th July 2012, 12:49 PM
  2. iPad vs HP Slate
    By Michael in forum Hardware
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 28th May 2010, 02:17 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21st May 2010, 12:08 PM
  4. Dell Vostro 3500 vs Hp Compaq 610
    By LukeC in forum General Chat
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 6th May 2010, 03:00 PM
  5. Extreme vs HP Procurve
    By tjb in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 21st August 2009, 12:12 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •