Hardware Thread, Seagate HDD failure rates: >25% over 3 years (article) in Technical; Originally Posted by difinity
Seagate used to offer 3 years as standard on their drives. Now it's only 1
22nd January 2014, 01:56 AM #16
The warranty differs depending upon which model you buy. Seagate's Desktop SSHDs have a two year warranty for example.
Originally Posted by difinity
Eight year old HDDs are so painfully slow you would probably want to replace them even if they didn't fail.
Originally Posted by Oaktech
22nd January 2014, 08:37 AM #17
Similar here really.
Originally Posted by rich_tech
When we first got one of our HP servers I was replacing failed WD disks at the rate of one per fortnight. HP support told me that they were seeing this across lots of customers and had swapped to Seagate. I replaced entire RAID array with Seagate and those original disks are still happily going along a few years later.
Hmm tempting fate there *goes to check RAID health*.
22nd January 2014, 08:47 AM #18
Totally understandable really - its a cost benefit analysis. In an enterprise like Backblaze, so long as you get a couple of years out of them you're making plenty of money. Seagate drives are usually a good amount cheaper than the competition so it works for them.
Originally Posted by CHR1S
Here, I now specify Hitachi when buying drives anyway, based on personal experience and evidence from other discussions and articles. Followed by WD.
Seagate just seem to have a bad habit of dying on us.
22nd January 2014, 09:23 PM #19
Excrement, I just got shipped one of these for my own personal pc build, turns out there are two types under the same model number, the two platter one which is decent and 30% faster and the three platter which is slow and unreliable, trouble is there is no way to tell other than weight now they have obscured the serial numbers. Apparently the 2 platter ones are about 500g and the 3 platter ones are about 600g.
Amazon.com: niels' review of Seagate Barracuda 2 TB HDD SATA 6 Gb/s NCQ...
Having just got a 600g drive I am sending it back unopened, cant trust WD drives due to my experiences in schools so looks like I am getting Hitachi if I can even source them here.
22nd January 2014, 09:54 PM #20
23rd January 2014, 11:18 AM #21
For an extra 75% on top yes, did a little research as I managed to return it, as far as we can tell the entire batch shipped to NZ were the dodgy ones, there were no two platter ones at the distributors at all.
Ended up getting A WD Green 2TB despite my massive mistrust of them as the only other stuff in the price range was Seagate which I had not checked out. Hitachi stuff was twice the cost for the same space so I decided against them.
25th January 2014, 07:41 PM #22
25th January 2014, 07:46 PM #23
It sounds like you have to pay through the nose for everything in NZ. I thought "Rip Off Britain" was bad enough as it is.
Originally Posted by SYNACK
Last edited by Arthur; 25th January 2014 at 07:53 PM.
Thanks to Arthur from:
SYNACK (26th January 2014)
By mwrighty in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Last Post: 6th August 2012, 03:02 PM
By LosOjos in forum Hardware
Last Post: 21st September 2011, 02:34 PM
By danielson81 in forum Hardware
Last Post: 28th January 2011, 12:18 PM
By waferthin in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 1st June 2009, 02:32 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)