Hardware Thread, Help me design our network in Technical; Originally Posted by teejay
You can use DFS for roaming profiles, you just have to make sure they're pointing to ...
28th April 2013, 06:20 PM #31
DFS-R specifically, I mean Which would be fairly pointless on a single target naturally.
Originally Posted by teejay
28th April 2013, 07:36 PM #32
You can use DFSR, you just have one folder target enabled so they always access that one. It may initially sound pointless, but we use it to replicate to a server in another building and if we lose the main server we can just enable the second server as the folder target and disable the main server as a target. Yes, you may get some corrupted profiles and a small amount of data loss that hasn't synced, but it means we can have minimal downtime.
Thanks to teejay from:
synaesthesia (28th April 2013)
29th April 2013, 12:57 AM #33
- Rep Power
Originally Posted by catch21
I will be putting them on two separate 19" racks and there will be proper airconditioning and I will work out UPS Wattage once I have finalised what equipment I am going to buy.
I think I will reduce the number of virtual servers, how many do you recommend.
Regarding wireless, it is definately on my list but I want to get the basics done first and then work on wireless in 2nd stage.
29th April 2013, 01:28 AM #34
I like the concept of making servers service-based as well to limit the possibility of an upgrade or problem with one system causing issues with another installed on the same server. However, I think 50 servers for your environment is overkill. There are many services that are complementary or very unlikely to ever conflict and can be installed on the same server. I think 25 VMs would be the absolute upper end for your requirements and you could probably do it with 20 or maybe even less and still have services very logically split across the servers.
Originally Posted by san_narula
Even if you are going to do wireless as a second phase (we did the same), I would recommend getting PoE switches as that will make it much easier to roll out as many WiFi AP's can use PoE, which will mean less work and cost to install them (no mains power required for each). If you don't purchase PoE switches you could always use PoE injectors, but that's an extra cost and adds mess into your data cabinets. I know, because I have one building that I didn't buy a PoE switch for and we have to use 6 injectors to power all of the APs (and security cameras) for that building.
Thanks to seawolf from:
san_narula (29th April 2013)
29th April 2013, 01:38 AM #35
- Rep Power
Thanks for the very detailed post seawolf.
Originally Posted by seawolf
I think our network is very similar in size to yours, it's just 2/3rd the size and spread over only 4 buildings. I would definitely like to know about your experiences and an onsite tour will be even better. I will send you a pm regarding this.
6th September 2013, 11:12 PM #36
- Rep Power
How are you doing? I have 9 VM's and a few physicals for backup- Veeam.....
A massive vote for LANSCHOOL here
800 kids- 100 staff/ exchange for staff, 365 for students.
Sophos AV found excellent but possible expensive on it's own. We buy into consortium so have volume discount.....
8th December 2013, 09:05 AM #37
- Rep Power
I would love to hear on the above . Hope everything went on well as you wanted .
what about on printing ?
By reggiep in forum General Chat
Last Post: 10th March 2009, 09:33 AM
By Blind in forum General Chat
Last Post: 3rd November 2008, 08:46 AM
By Deaks in forum Windows
Last Post: 22nd July 2008, 11:13 AM
By ninjabeaver in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 2nd December 2005, 10:50 AM
By ninjabeaver in forum Hardware
Last Post: 26th September 2005, 10:50 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread