Hardware Thread, Which SSD drives are people using now? in Technical; This article may be relevant with considerations of size: AnandTech - Exploring the Relationship Between Spare Area and Performance Consistency ...
4th December 2012, 01:36 PM #16
This article may be relevant with considerations of size: AnandTech - Exploring the Relationship Between Spare Area and Performance Consistency in Modern SSDs
Leaving 25% of the space unused results in both quicker & more consistent performance. If you're running a modern OS with TRIM support then you shouldn't need to do much beyond "leave that bit empty" - partitioning shouldn't be necessary, strictly speaking.
So on a 128Gb drive, use no more than 96Gb and enjoy the benefits.
4th December 2012, 01:41 PM #17
Yep thats why the Intels are so good. Notice they don't advertise the full amount of space. The 60GB they sell actually has more chips inside improving performance and reliability.
Originally Posted by sonofsanta
4th December 2012, 01:51 PM #18
That article says that Intel's new DC S3700 (enterprise grade SSD) actually has
Originally Posted by zag
It's probably also why Intel drives always cost more
264GiB of NAND on-board but only exposes 186GiB of it (200GB advertised capacity) as user accessible storage
4th December 2012, 02:30 PM #19
Used one in this very laptop for the last year, initial speed difference was noticeable, however with the drive almost full and random usage id say its no different to a good quality HDD.
Originally Posted by Oaktech
4th December 2012, 02:39 PM #20
I've heard fairly mixed reports about them as well to be honest. The general feedback seemed to be that it's no match for an SSD. You can get a 128Gb model for around £50 these days so unless you really need a teragbyte of storage on your laptop there probably isn't much point IMO.
Originally Posted by CHR1S
Having said that I only use my laptop as a portable device. If you're laptop was your main computer I could understand you might not be so keen to make that compromise.
Last edited by flyinghaggis; 4th December 2012 at 02:41 PM.
4th December 2012, 02:57 PM #21
Originally Posted by flyinghaggis
Yes this is my portable workstation, so it was a compromise. Its quick enough for what I do, and will certainly be quick enough until we see sensible prices for 500Gb+ SSDs anyway.
Im slowly moving my locally stored VMs onto a microserver so I wont need them with me all the time.
4th December 2012, 08:54 PM #22
Mix of Crucial M4 (most commonly) and Kingston V200+. Very happy with both - our base images are small (even with CS5.5, Office etc) so 64GB drives have been fine, only half full or so. More is always better though. I'm also running them on everything from SATA 1 (mobile Intel 945) to SATA 3 interfaces - still gives a huge speed boost on the old connection.
By ben604 in forum Netbooks, PDA and Phones
Last Post: 29th March 2012, 11:37 AM
By Axel in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 7th March 2012, 09:14 AM
By tomazzotta in forum Windows
Last Post: 5th March 2012, 08:14 PM
By fawkers in forum Windows
Last Post: 15th August 2011, 10:45 AM
By intrigue in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 8th July 2009, 09:53 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)