![]() | Register | FAQ | Members | Social Groups | User Map | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Group Project A place to discuss the group projects. |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search Thread | Language |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #1 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | How about setting up a project for schools to obtain blacklists from that are maintained by the schools themselves in some wiki/collaborative form? I think it could be a very useful tool as the lists would be kept up to date by those that deal with the sites themselves on a daily basis. What do people think? |
| |
| | #2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 19
Thanked 58 Times in 50 Posts
Rep Power: 17 | It might be useful for those using straight blocklists - but proxies tend to move about quite a bit. Useful for other "blockable" sites. |
| |
| | #3 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | Well that'd be the point really. As things move around quickly, we spot them a lot quicker than the current providers so we would add them to the list quickly. And as straight blocklists it would be invaluable in my opinion. |
| |
| | #4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fylde, Lancs, UK.
Posts: 9,934
Thanks: 42
Thanked 230 Times in 209 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 67 | You're reinventing the wheel. Most notably the work at http://urlblacklist.com Now it is commercial, but that's mainly out of necessity. Bandwidth is expensive. |
| |
| | #5 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | Well the point is the open nature of it. Why should we be paying for things that we ourselves are constantly updating? The point is the collaboration and school focus rather than a company with profits as the bottom line. Also, yes bandwidth costs money but then there are always sources of funding for things like this. There is absolutely no 'necessity' for such a project to cost money for each school. How about a univeristy hosting it? Many host open source projects already... It would barely touch their bandwidth in most cases. |
| |
| | #6 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fylde, Lancs, UK.
Posts: 9,934
Thanks: 42
Thanked 230 Times in 209 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 67 | ok, so we're half way there. What about the legal liabilities? Hands up who wants to shoulder that responsibility? |
| |
| | #7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | Sounds like an interesting idea... On the purely financial side, when you consider what commercial services like URL blacklist charge, you only need to multiply that by a small number of schools before creating an open list begins to look attractive. As localzuk says, bandwidth isn't expensive on the NEN -- that's part of what it's for. Given sufficient people contributing, you'd end up with an effective list which reacted very quickly to the types of sites causing problems within schools, including proxy bypass sites -- it only takes one school, monitoring their logs, to pick up on a bypass site and it would be blocked for all schools the next time they pulled the lists (assuming they subscribe to and block that category, of course). As far as the legal implications go, I'd be interested to hear more about that. I certainly doubt any sane provider of lists offers things like indemnity to schools should they be sued if undesirable content gets through. Anyone know otherwise? |
| |
| | #8 | ||
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fylde, Lancs, UK.
Posts: 9,934
Thanks: 42
Thanked 230 Times in 209 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 67 | Quote:
Quote:
Also, this discussion has reminded me of a secondary issue. There have been incidents in the past where certain named sites have paid money to commercial filtering providers to be exempt from their filters. Despite them clearly belonging in some filtering categories. | ||
| |
| | #9 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,451
Thanks: 49
Thanked 151 Times in 124 Posts
Rep Power: 39 | In principle it's good idea, but how to maintain the list? domain names change and will need a lot of manual checking. The perfect job -professional pr0n surfer. |
| |
| | #10 | ||||
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| |
| | #12 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | It'd have to be when there were a few people who were willing to help start it up and maybe get some funding and support from somewhere. To start we'd just need some hosting so we could start planning it and the motivation to do so. |
| |
| | #13 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: County Durham
Posts: 5,687
Thanks: 106
Thanked 90 Times in 73 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 38 | Surely the best way to do this is to have one or more schools hosting the files and only allowing downloads out of school hours, eg. a cron job to fetch the lists between 10pm and 7am. |
| |
| | #14 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | At this point I think you should forget about the technology, hosting etc. and (along with legal implications) consider how you maintain the integrity of such a list: Who gets to add things? Who gets to delete them? How do you verify the identity of your list editors? How do you prevent accidental or deliberately harmful changes to the list? And if you sort that out, what categories will it address? |
| |
| | #15 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Minehead, Somerset
Posts: 4,083
Thanks: 49
Thanked 111 Times in 99 Posts
Blog Entries: 12 Rep Power: 33 | I think that sort of thing is what would be discussed once the project was started. However, my ideas were that users of the system would sign up via their official school email address (so in somerset it is a @educ.somerset.gov.uk address). This would help sort out a large amount of possible malicious changes IMO. I think everyone would get to add and remove items but would have to provide a brief reason for each item. To prevent accidental deletion of items we could implement a limit of items being deleted at once and an easy 'rollback' tool for re-instating such items. Also, a list of recent changes would show users what had changed... But all those are just ideas. Really it would need somewhere to start discussing these sort of things. Anyone up for providing a spot to host a wiki for discussions to start? I'd prefer not to do it at my school as our connection is bashed enough as it is. Somewhere in Lancashire sounds good - they give good beefy pipes to the high schools up there :P |
| |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Open Source XP | Dos_Box | General Chat | 26 | 21-11-2008 06:14 PM |
| Open Source Portfolio | wesleyw | How do you do....it? | 1 | 13-07-2007 02:55 PM |
| Open source alternative. | Lee_K_81 | *nix | 13 | 06-02-2007 12:56 PM |
| MP support for Open Source | Face-Man | *nix | 13 | 08-12-2006 07:56 AM |
| Open source in schools | kevinmcaleer | General Chat | 14 | 22-12-2005 09:52 PM |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search Thread |
|
|




