I urge people to vote no ... as their second preference.
my voting card hasn't come through the post yet :(
Yup. I will be voting yes, and I'd suggest others should to. The current system is inherently unfair and not representative of peoples votes.
Anything that potentially gives those with their snouts in the trough in Parliament the incentive to actually get off their fat backsides and actually do some work is a good thing. I'll be voting for AV.
but I fail to see the benefits of this AV, can someone enlighten me? All I see is that the person who comes 3rd (and out of 3 candidates that is last place) can potentially win the vote and represent people who didn't think they were good enough to be first.
Nothing fairer about AV, just a different way of voting that will probably affect the outcome for a couple of MP's at most.
The best way forward would be to stick to the current system but with a 'None of the Above' vote, if 'None of the Above' has the majority, then no-one is voted in, a re-election is called with none of the candidates from the first vote able to stand. This second ballot should not have a 'None of the Above' or if it does it shouldn't trigger another ellection.
This will enable people to get rid of MP's that don't work for their constituency and hold them more accountable, which is really what we all want.
I'd hope that it will also increase the perceived probability of hung parliaments and that the parties will have to not only tell us what they will do if they win but what they will do if they have to form a coalition. That might be a forlorn hope though since at the last election when the biggest single issue was dealing with the deficit, all of the parties schemed together to avoid giving any detail.
Meanwhile the benefits of first past the post are ... errr??
The person who comes third (or anywhere else) has no effect at all if the person who comes first gets more than 50% of the vote.
If no-one gets more than 50% of the vote then you look at the votes of the people who voted for the loser and (effectively) say "you can't have your candidate so who's your second choice" and you add those votes on to the other candidates.
Depending on how close the vote is you may now get a winner or, if there are a lot of candidates, you might have to eliminate the next to the bottom candidate and re-allocate their votes.
What you end up with is a system where the winner was actively voted for by a majority (even if [s]he was second or third choice). At the moment, you might say "Well, I really want Lib Dem but if I can't have them then I'd like Conservative" but your second choice gets ignored.
At the moment, roughly two thirds of MPs are elected with less than 50% of their constituents voting for them. Now it may be that this is fine (I vote Tory; I get a Labour MP but I'm happy with that because the Labour MP was my second choice). With this system we get a better chance to know what people actually want (even if it is second choice)
no system is 100% fair what weve got works as well as any and some systems 1 party may get enough of the vote to have x seats in parliament but gain seats in areas they lost in.
at the end of the day im not sure it matters anyway as when was the last time the majority politicians did whats right for their constituents rather than towing the party line anyway?
Haven't we got more pressing matters to attend to - such as the rising level of Unemployment and National Debt?
Isn't this just a lite version of PR anyway?
How many will add an extra vote anyway?
"I'm a Labour supporter, I won't put those other two in my vote!"
"I'm a Conservative! Like hell I am putting in labour and those Lib Dems are getting in the way!"
TBH I find it hard enough to pick one idiot in office, let alone three.
We used to use AV at university for Students Union elections... it didn't seem such a bad system apart from the length of time it took to count the votes.
Single Transferable Vote!
The best system shame they are going for AV instead.
Single transferable vote - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Andrew Rawnsley makes convincing argument pro-AV, Adopting the alternative vote would be a very British revolution | Andrew Rawnsley | Comment is free | The Observer