+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 48
General Chat Thread, Head asked to block mobile phone signals in school... in General; ...
  1. #16

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,132
    Thank Post
    522
    Thanked 2,542 Times in 1,976 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    876
    Quote Originally Posted by X-13 View Post
    Wouldn't everything inside the cage still work?

    It just stops signals getting in and out.
    Ah, but there's the rub - I'm pretty sure the site staff would want to be able to use their own mobile phones around the site, so it would have to be just the classrooms that were sorted.

    Quote Originally Posted by dhicks View Post
    I think "magnetic" whiteboard/blackboard paint should do the trick - basically paint with iron filings in. I think places like homebase sell it for a bit less than £250, and you're bound to be able to get it in bulk somewhere. You might also be able to mix your own by simply adding some iron filings to some paint.

    You'd need to have a wireless access point in every classroom, but it would cut out any interfering signals and would probably reduce the signal strength needed on each access point (because each one now only has to transmit in one classroom). You could switch your communications to VoIP handsets.
    Not practical - we can't have network cables installed without great expense (BSF school). Not to mention we already have 80+ wireless access points and coverage is kinda spotty.

  2. #17
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    4,290
    Thank Post
    869
    Thanked 395 Times in 305 Posts
    Blog Entries
    60
    Rep Power
    288
    One word to defeat the paint idea.

    Windows.

  3. #18


    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,463
    Thank Post
    1,462
    Thanked 891 Times in 572 Posts
    Rep Power
    647
    Quote Originally Posted by CAM View Post
    One word to defeat the paint idea.

    Windows.
    You could use Windows NT (No Telephones)

  4. #19
    jamesfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    2,212
    Thank Post
    138
    Thanked 346 Times in 292 Posts
    Rep Power
    90
    Seems like we have another case of a non technical issue with people looking for a technical solution (because everyone knows IT guys can do anything ).

    The issue is students are using their phones - this is a discipline issue and should be treated as such.

  5. #20


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,802
    Thank Post
    231
    Thanked 883 Times in 759 Posts
    Rep Power
    300
    even blocking signals wouldnt stop kids using them as cameras which is possibly as bad if not worse anyway

  6. #21

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    187
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Good luck with this one.

  7. #22


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,414
    Thank Post
    184
    Thanked 356 Times in 285 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    One thing to remember is the frequency bands which will be used for 4g are going up for auction soon. Will any solution you buy now be able to block them?

  8. #23


    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,236
    Thank Post
    151
    Thanked 243 Times in 168 Posts
    Rep Power
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    Indeed. It is looking for a technological solution to a non-technological problem.
    You took the words right out of my mouth.
    (Meatloaf 1977)

  9. #24

    Andrew_C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Winchester
    Posts
    3,047
    Thank Post
    64
    Thanked 391 Times in 299 Posts
    Rep Power
    163
    Illegal to block, Faraday cage would work but block everything (and is impractical).

    How about a detector and a member of SMT doing spot checks in a corridor; like a speed trap? After a few weeks of crushed phones detentions/letters home etc the message would get through. Maybe you could get several schools to club together to buy the detector?

    We caught a little scrote with the mark scheme for his mock exam open on his phone just last week...

  10. Thanks to Andrew_C from:

    NDW (15th May 2012)

  11. #25

    plexer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    13,580
    Thank Post
    723
    Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Rep Power
    432
    It's not worth the hassle or pursuing.

    Ofcom | Mobile phone jammers and cellular enhancers

    Ben

  12. #26
    NDW
    NDW is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    a magical place
    Posts
    70
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    9
    I think mobile phone detectors would be the best option, at least then the students actually get caught and can be reprimanded. showing that you are looking for people with phones in school. not just for people using them in lessons

  13. #27

    JJonas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Walsham, Norfolk
    Posts
    3,158
    Thank Post
    404
    Thanked 445 Times in 330 Posts
    Rep Power
    387
    When I looked into mobile phone detectors a couple of years ago, they would only detect a phone while it was communicating with its mast, which only happens every now and again or while a call is being made.
    In addition to this they would only tell you that there was a phone switched on in range of the detector they could not tell you the location of the phone.

    anybody know if this has changed?

  14. #28


    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,968
    Thank Post
    1,112
    Thanked 440 Times in 322 Posts
    Rep Power
    227
    The thing is, parents now insist on their children having mobile phones on their person, 'in case of emergency'. Also, in today's age of smartphones, a lot of mobiles are communicating without the conscious action of their owner. Things like facebook checking for new messages/posts/tags/etc, apps checking for upgrades, heck even the operating system checking for newer versions, or Android querying any new mail in your Google inbox.

    Will you be able to differentiate between behind-the-scenes, uncontrollable activity and user-initiated activity? Or are you just going to enforce an 'All phones must be switched off at all times' rule, in which case you'll get "Well what if I need to get a hold of my son/daughter!?" (because apparently phoning the school office and asking for them just isn't good enough.)
    Last edited by Garacesh; 15th May 2012 at 02:00 PM.

  15. #29

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,132
    Thank Post
    522
    Thanked 2,542 Times in 1,976 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    876
    Quote Originally Posted by Garacesh View Post
    The thing is, parents now insist on their children having mobile phones on their person, 'in case of emergency'. Also, in today's age of smartphones, a lot of mobiles are communicating without the conscious action of their owner. Things like facebook checking for new messages/posts/tags/etc, apps checking for upgrades, heck even the operating system checking for newer versions, or Android querying any new mail in your Google inbox.

    Will you be able to differentiate between behind-the-scenes, uncontrollable activity and user-initiated activity? Or are you just going to enforce an 'All phones must be switched off at all times' rule, in which case you'll get "Well what if I need to get a hold of my son/daughter!?" (because apparently phoning the school office and asking for them just isn't good enough.)
    The argument from parents is 100% irrelevant. If a parent needs to contact their child during the day, they must use the school reception to pass a message on. It is not for them to decide to disrupt their child's day. During a school day, the child is under the care of the school, not the parent.

  16. #30

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    9,265
    Thank Post
    242
    Thanked 1,575 Times in 1,254 Posts
    Rep Power
    341
    I really don't see this is possible and the costs to try and prevent it are going to be huge. Even then, it won't be water tight and it would create problems for staff and your WLAN.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mobile phone signal blocking?
    By mrbios in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 26th June 2014, 11:29 AM
  2. Mobile Phone Coverage in Brisbane
    By FN-GM in forum AU General Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th August 2011, 04:10 PM
  3. How to block 3g phones access to the internet ?
    By niko007 in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10th February 2011, 10:22 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 27th April 2010, 04:51 PM
  5. Straw Poll for PDA/UMPC/Phone use in schools
    By Luke_T in forum Netbooks, PDA and Phones
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23rd June 2009, 12:18 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •