+ Post New Thread
Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 196
General Chat Thread, SSD drives in education in General; Originally Posted by sidewinder I've asked for a quote for PCs including SSDs and they have specified OCZ drives. Should ...
  1. #106
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,002
    Thank Post
    983
    Thanked 477 Times in 398 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by sidewinder View Post
    I've asked for a quote for PCs including SSDs and they have specified OCZ drives. Should I insist on Intel or Crucial or go with what they recommend?
    On one hand I'm thinking that if I get failures then it is their job to replace them anyway, but then I still don't want failures because it means downtime for a computer.
    Insist on Intel, the price difference should be minimal.

    We have over 250 now installed and never had a failure.

  2. #107


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,808
    Thank Post
    262
    Thanked 2,969 Times in 2,183 Posts
    Rep Power
    847
    Quote Originally Posted by sidewinder View Post
    Should I insist on Intel or Crucial or go with what they recommend?
    Intel would be my first choice too, although Crucial M4's are also fine. I definitely wouldn't get OCZ drives.

    We have Intel 320 Series SSDs in our Art PCs with zero failures so far.

  3. #108

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    leicester
    Posts
    742
    Thank Post
    78
    Thanked 188 Times in 154 Posts
    Rep Power
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by sidewinder View Post
    I've asked for a quote for PCs including SSDs and they have specified OCZ drives. Should I insist on Intel or Crucial or go with what they recommend?
    On one hand I'm thinking that if I get failures then it is their job to replace them anyway, but then I still don't want failures because it means downtime for a computer.
    Intel. Not Crucial or OCZ, this is from experience.

  4. #109
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,002
    Thank Post
    983
    Thanked 477 Times in 398 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur View Post
    Intel would be my first choice too, although Crucial M4's are also fine. I definitely wouldn't get OCZ drives.
    That link sums it up really well

    SSD Return Rates
    - Intel 0.1% (as against 0.3%)
    - Crucial 0.8% (as against 1.9%)
    - Corsair 2.9% (as against 2.7%)
    - OCZ 4.2% (as against 3.5%)

    Intel confirms its position at the top with a very impressive rate. It is followed by Crucial, which has improved its rate significantly but it has to be said that the M225 previously affected things quite a bit – on the C300s alone its rate was 1%. Corsair’s and especially OCZ’s returns are up however and OCZ is still clearly bringing up the rear. 8 SSDs have rates of over 5%:
    Try finding a hard disk with a 0.1% failure rate!!
    Last edited by zag; 22nd May 2012 at 09:44 AM.

  5. #110

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,529
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,648 Times in 2,049 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    925
    Interestingly, many hard drives have failure rates higher than OCZ's SSD failure rate...

  6. #111

    mac_shinobi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    10,053
    Thank Post
    3,585
    Thanked 1,123 Times in 1,025 Posts
    Rep Power
    377
    When I was looking at SSD's I was looking at either Intel or OWC ( memoryc.com do the OWC SSD's )

  7. #112


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    7,059
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 926 Times in 795 Posts
    Rep Power
    309
    got to be said its the best upgrade i ever put in my old laptop (easrly core 2 due) went from approx 3 min boot time to about 1 (cloned across so same image etc).

    Anyone tried one in a netbook as im fed up of people complaining they are slow (which they are to be fair but what do you expect from something that cheap?)

    as to wether its worth putting them in an old p4 to extend their liofe why not you can always when you retire them move the ssd to the next worse machines that dont have ssds. Performance wise i went from an intel 945 chipset laptop to a new one (cant remember chipset but its an i7) and windows hdd rating diddnt change hugely 7.2 - 7.7 iirc better but not exactly as huge as going from a hdd to an ssd in the first place.

    Also how do ssds cope with xp i just cant bring myself to win7 a netbooks that are xp it takes too long

  8. #113

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,271
    Thank Post
    884
    Thanked 2,749 Times in 2,322 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by sted View Post
    Performance wise i went from an intel 945 chipset laptop to a new one (cant remember chipset but its an i7) and windows hdd rating diddnt change hugely 7.2 - 7.7 iirc better but not exactly as huge as going from a hdd to an ssd in the first place.

    Also how do ssds cope with xp i just cant bring myself to win7 a netbooks that are xp it takes too long
    I think the performance scores are not linnier meaning that the closer you get to the top end the bigger the gap.

    I would not put XP on a standard SSD as it is rather primative and does not support TRIM so would bog down rather quickly with usage. I run 7 ultimate on an Atom CPU just fine with desktop drives so it should be quick enough on an SSD. The CPUs themselves have a decent amount of cache and support modern extentions making it work fine.

  9. #114

    CHR1S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    4,573
    Thank Post
    1,652
    Thanked 506 Times in 309 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Not read every post but I wanted to add my 2p worth -

    Gaming PC - i5, OCZ Vertex 3 120Gb
    Laptop - C2D (a pretty decent one, cant remember what) 500Gb SATA drive

    I can power both on at the same time, boot into Win 7, load steam, load Skyrim and start playing before the laptop hits the logon screen on the laptop.
    Things load so fast you don't have time to read splash screens (again Skyrim as an example) and PS rendering and Sony Vegas video editing are hugely faster.

    You can pick up the above SSD for sub £100 and would be a fool not to... its THAT much of an improvement!

  10. #115

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    1,048
    Thank Post
    226
    Thanked 63 Times in 56 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    After reading this thread i bought a Crucial M4 and installed it into one of the 3 year old pc's in an IT suite. Comparing the 2 machines there is not enough of a speed increase to justify the cost. Boot/login/logoff are quicker, maybe a second or 2 than the SATA machine. Opening of office applications i could barely see a difference, actually on some test the SATA was quicker. At the moment i am yet to be impressed.

  11. #116
    cpjitservices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hessle
    Posts
    2,605
    Thank Post
    544
    Thanked 301 Times in 277 Posts
    Rep Power
    85
    Do I have this wrong please do correct me if so - whilst SSD's are all well and good but dont they have a certain amount of writes on them before you need to replace it ?

  12. #117
    jamesfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    2,214
    Thank Post
    138
    Thanked 347 Times in 293 Posts
    Rep Power
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by cpjitservices View Post
    Do I have this wrong please do correct me if so - whilst SSD's are all well and good but dont they have a certain amount of writes on them before you need to replace it ?
    Its at such a high value these days that unless you are trying to run databases off consumer drives there shouldn't ever be an issue.

    Looking at the lifetime on my old Vertx 2 I have 84% remaning, on the same ammount of writes on my new Vertex 3 I haven't even used a single resurve block yet.

    Thats under heavy IT tech style use with a few VMs now and again

  13. #118

    CHR1S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    4,573
    Thank Post
    1,652
    Thanked 506 Times in 309 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Is it SATA 2? What OS? Is it set up correctly?

  14. #119

    sonofsanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    5,375
    Thank Post
    958
    Thanked 1,630 Times in 1,103 Posts
    Blog Entries
    47
    Rep Power
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by CHR1S View Post
    Is it SATA 2? What OS? Is it set up correctly?
    In particular, are your partitions properly aligned?

  15. #120
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,002
    Thank Post
    983
    Thanked 477 Times in 398 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by cpjitservices View Post
    Do I have this wrong please do correct me if so - whilst SSD's are all well and good but dont they have a certain amount of writes on them before you need to replace it ?
    They last something like 30 years with normal use.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. SSD drives in servers
    By zag in forum Hardware
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 13th October 2009, 09:50 AM
  2. Accssing mapped drives in word
    By Uraken in forum Windows
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19th October 2006, 08:24 AM
  3. Careers in Educational IT Support
    By crc-ict in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 3rd February 2006, 09:55 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 7th December 2005, 09:09 PM
  5. Hot topics in education IT: PC Pro magazine
    By paultrotterpcpro in forum IT News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17th August 2005, 10:43 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •