+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
General Chat Thread, Fred Goodwin.... in General; I think it's wrong that they've taken Fred's knighthood away..... .....he got it for 'services to banking' - instead of ...
  1. #1

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,135
    Thank Post
    1,908
    Thanked 1,343 Times in 742 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    395

    Fred Goodwin....

    I think it's wrong that they've taken Fred's knighthood away.....

    .....he got it for 'services to banking' - instead of stripping him of the title they should have simply changed a 'b' to a 'w'........

    Result - lifelong embarrassment for him and much infantile humour for the rest of us.....
    Last edited by tech_guy; 1st February 2012 at 11:16 PM.

  2. #2

    sonofsanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    4,921
    Thank Post
    860
    Thanked 1,431 Times in 984 Posts
    Blog Entries
    47
    Rep Power
    614
    Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.





    (services to w@nking... hehehe)

  3. #3

    witch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    11,107
    Thank Post
    1,364
    Thanked 2,374 Times in 1,671 Posts
    Rep Power
    703
    Don't understand the thing anyway - Jeffrey Archer went to prison and they didnt take away his knighthood. So not really fair, is it?

  4. #4


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,202
    Thank Post
    442
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by witch View Post
    Don't understand the thing anyway - Jeffrey Archer went to prison and they didnt take away his knighthood. So not really fair, is it?
    No. And there are plenty of other knighthoods and CBEs' who sat on boards of banks and made equally bad decisions.
    Goodwin lost his knighthood because he was a media scapegoat. I'm not saying he didn't do anything wrong, just he was sacrificed to the media for the sake of the system.

  5. #5
    Pyroman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,200
    Thank Post
    433
    Thanked 140 Times in 105 Posts
    Rep Power
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by witch View Post
    Don't understand the thing anyway - Jeffrey Archer went to prison and they didnt take away his knighthood. So not really fair, is it?
    I didn't think Jeffrey was knighted, he's a lord isn't he? And it's all a load of rubbish anyway, RBS boss was forced to forfeit his bonus, fred goodwin lost his knighthood and all we'll now hear is "Oh yes we're dealing with the crisis" by doing over 2 guys and not dealing with the underlying problem. they are attempting to claw at some credibility... which won't happen

    Edit: i would say claw back but i don't think the condems had any credibility in the first place

  6. #6

    witch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Dorset
    Posts
    11,107
    Thank Post
    1,364
    Thanked 2,374 Times in 1,671 Posts
    Rep Power
    703
    Jeffrey Archer should still have lost his 'lordship' when he went to prison.
    As you say, @Pyroman, this is all whitewash to show they are 'dealing', and pandering to a certain newspaper-reading populace.
    This knee-jerk reaction stuff does no one any favours and gets us nowhere in the long term

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    433
    Thank Post
    58
    Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
    Rep Power
    27
    I enjoyed Jackie Stewart on the radio saying (basically) "it wasn't just fred, lots of other people were involved so its not fair on him". Poor Fred, just a 700,000 pa pension to survive on. To Jackie, I'd suggest that there's something wrong in a system which richly rewards failure. Current system - get it right - get a huge bonus. Get it wrong, get a bonus and a taxpayer bailout. If you're going to link payment to performance you've got to not pay for non-performance.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    631
    Thank Post
    52
    Thanked 106 Times in 76 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Agree with the idea that Goodwin was a scapegoat. Goodwin is a monumental *word* and deserves, in a moral world, to suffer horribly for all the thigns he got wrong, but this wasn't about who got it right or wrong, it was about putting someone's head on a pike to silence the Guardian/BBC.

  9. #9
    nicholab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    1,463
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 97 Times in 93 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    50
    Goodwin had the worst management system he did not listen to the people he worked with that is why he crashed and burned. People need to under stand servant management this is the best way of managing.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •