+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
General Chat Thread, Robin Bar Stewards in General; ...
  1. #1

    creese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    -28° 31' 48.89", +28° 25' 37.42" ... if only.
    Posts
    3,256
    Thank Post
    182
    Thanked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    174

    Robin Bar Stewards


  2. #2

    sparkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,038
    Thank Post
    1,376
    Thanked 1,782 Times in 1,202 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22
    Rep Power
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    BBC News - Millions more in line for tax rebates

    'It is estimated these will cost the government more than £2bn.'

    Why will it? It wasn't and isn't the government's money.
    Sorry I don't understand your point, of course it will cost the government money, people gave them too much money and they have to give it back.

  3. #3

    creese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    -28° 31' 48.89", +28° 25' 37.42" ... if only.
    Posts
    3,256
    Thank Post
    182
    Thanked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by sparkeh View Post
    Sorry I don't understand your point, of course it will cost the government money, people gave them too much money and they have to give it back.
    That's where I'm going wrong. For 40 odd years I was under the impression the government TOOK money from me. Believe me if I had realised I was giving, I would have cancelled the standing order.

    Off to call the bank now.

  4. #4

    creese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    -28° 31' 48.89", +28° 25' 37.42" ... if only.
    Posts
    3,256
    Thank Post
    182
    Thanked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    174
    If a body works out a sum they want and need, a budget if you like. They take that amount and more, they give the more back, apart from the bank fees and postage, it's not costing them as the costings were worked out years ago. If bank fees and postage cost £2bn the government need to look at bank charges and the Post Office charges.

  5. #5

    sparkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,038
    Thank Post
    1,376
    Thanked 1,782 Times in 1,202 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22
    Rep Power
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    That's where I'm going wrong. For 40 odd years I was under the impression the government TOOK money from me. Believe me if I had realised I was giving, I would have cancelled the standing order.

    Off to call the bank now.
    Ok ok I'll rephrase, the government took too much money from some people, now they have to give it back.
    Again, how does this not cost the government?

  6. #6
    SteveBentley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,450
    Thank Post
    120
    Thanked 263 Times in 189 Posts
    Rep Power
    73
    I think you're arguing semantics here - the Government has £2bn less to play with than it thought it had. Saying that it's lost this money doesn't negate the fact that it shouldn't have had it in the first place.

  7. Thanks to SteveBentley from:

    Oaktech (19th October 2011)

  8. #7

    aerospacemango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Northants
    Posts
    1,994
    Thank Post
    283
    Thanked 249 Times in 200 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    296
    I'm going to bet that I don't see any rebate.....


  9. #8

    sparkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,038
    Thank Post
    1,376
    Thanked 1,782 Times in 1,202 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22
    Rep Power
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    If a body works out a sum they want and need, a budget if you like. They take that amount and more, they give the more back, apart from the bank fees and postage, it's not costing them as the costings were worked out years ago. If bank fees and postage cost £2bn the government need to look at bank charges and the Post Office charges.
    I don't think the tax system works like that.
    The government can project what it will raise in tax based on the tax rules in place and plan accordingly with the estimated budget, but it can't possible set up the tax system to raise a specific amount, the logistics involved would be impossible. Remember that in the past, government have been surprised by both large under and over projections of the tax income.
    In this situation the taxman has made a mistake in calculating some people's NICs meaning the money has come into the government's bank account and spent. Therefore they now have to find £2bn to refund the affected people.

  10. #9
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    4,311
    Thank Post
    871
    Thanked 407 Times in 308 Posts
    Blog Entries
    60
    Rep Power
    290
    People give too much money.
    Gov are all "We have an extra 2bn!"
    Gov plan for extra 2bn.
    Gov PFY goes "Hey errr guys, we have charged them too much and someone cottoned on!"
    Gov gives people back 2bn.
    Gov now has a big 2bn hole in their coffers as they planned to make use of that money somewhere and now they don't have it.
    (Gov do stealth tax increase in near future? ).

  11. Thanks to CAM from:

    creese (19th October 2011)

  12. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    631
    Thank Post
    52
    Thanked 106 Times in 76 Posts
    Rep Power
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    Because the BBC/Guardian believes that everyone's wealth belongs to the government to do with as they see fit.

  13. #11


    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,463
    Thank Post
    1,462
    Thanked 892 Times in 573 Posts
    Rep Power
    647
    I think everyone who is owed the refund should do the decent thing and let the government keep it. They probably didn't realise they had been diddled, so they won't miss it.

  14. #12


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,822
    Thank Post
    231
    Thanked 890 Times in 765 Posts
    Rep Power
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by laserblazer View Post
    I think everyone who is owed the refund should do the decent thing and let the government keep it. They probably didn't realise they had been diddled, so they won't miss it.
    why the govenment tax us for every little thing why should we give any back why should you pay more than you "fair share" id be more bothered about large companies using loopholes to pay back stupidly small amounts. Besides they would only waste the money anyway

  15. #13

    jinnantonnixx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    In the Calamatorium.
    Posts
    2,028
    Thank Post
    120
    Thanked 513 Times in 347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    288
    Didn't they just 'QE' £75bn into existence? They should have made it a nice £77bn and swept this under the carpet.

  16. #14

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,164
    Thank Post
    522
    Thanked 2,558 Times in 1,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    If a body works out a sum they want and need, a budget if you like. They take that amount and more, they give the more back, apart from the bank fees and postage, it's not costing them as the costings were worked out years ago. If bank fees and postage cost £2bn the government need to look at bank charges and the Post Office charges.
    Why would it be not costing them? Interest is being paid back also. Not to mention, there is also the 900,000 underpayments of £300 or less being written off. It all adds up.

  17. #15


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,822
    Thank Post
    231
    Thanked 890 Times in 765 Posts
    Rep Power
    302
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    Why would it be not costing them? Interest is being paid back also. Not to mention, there is also the 900,000 underpayments of £300 or less being written off. It all adds up.
    but it is their mistake if they cant do the sums maybe the tax system needs to be simpler



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Printer Settings / Language Bar - profile
    By spike in forum Windows
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17th February 2006, 10:54 AM
  2. Stop internet access from address bar
    By adamyoung in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 25th January 2006, 01:45 PM
  3. scoll effect with dock bar
    By russdev in forum Mac
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13th December 2005, 09:34 AM
  4. the up icon on the bar of explorer
    By Rozzer in forum Windows
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4th October 2005, 10:26 PM
  5. Sleazy geek bars..
    By Dos_Box in forum Other Stuff
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th August 2005, 08:54 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •