General Chat Thread, BT ordered to block pirate links in General; ...
28th July 2011, 03:39 PM #16
Just wish the MPA would realise there business model is dead in the water and move to a model that does't people off. The music industry has moved. Piracy would reduce if films could be purchased for under £5 instead of £20+.
I have BT Vision and the pay per view had gone up from £2.99 to £4.00 for SD, £5.00 for HD and £6.00. this pricing is getting to near the supermarket discount price point to purcase it.
Services like hulu are the way forward, if MPA continue as they are piracy will just keep rising. oh at get the studios to make other things apart from sequels as it the first one is rubbish its not going to get better with a second one.
28th July 2011, 03:43 PM #17
When will these companies realise their way of doing things is outdated and not what consumers want.
When people can stream or download a movie in a format they want, when they want, and can keep it for as long as they want there might be a reduction in piracy.
Things like netflix in the US are a decent example. Shame lovefilm in the Uk is awful.
Piracy is always going to happen, they should perhaps be looking at why the average joe is pirating movies instead of trying to lock him up.
28th July 2011, 03:59 PM #18
I dont think the cinema price is particularly bad for entrance. However cinema's recently are shoddy. Noone there these days to control the yobs/morons, snack/drinks prices are - well, go thirsty unless you fancy remortgaging and the general experience is not that good any more.
Realistically, release films tend to hit 12/13 quid on DVD which I'm happy to pay for - it's not an unreasonable price. But having paid that, I don't want to put it in the player and sit through 15 minutes of "You might also want to watch..." "Disney also do..." "DON'T PIRATE!!" "REALLY, PLEASE DON'T PIRATE THIS DISC!" "Yes, I know if you're pirated this disc you've taken this stupid warning off, so this warning is 100% pointless". It's the equivalent of making the word "Mars" smaller on a sweet packet so you can fit on PLEASE DO NOT STEAL THIS PRODUCT.
The *ENTIRE SYSTEM* is outdated and ridiculous, and the RIAA/MPAA/Whoever need to wake up and actually ask what people want.
There's a few ideas - one of my own would be the option to pay another fiver at the end of a film if you enjoy it to get a coupon which allows you to download it via whatever possible means, legally, at release time.
Without all the crud.
In essence, they're repeatedly trying to slam the door yet they know full well the horse has long bolted. Not only has the horse bolted, but it's watching them slam the door, laughing at them. And rightly so.
Something has to give for them to notice, and I hope it happens soon. I'm not saying they deserve to have their products stolen; I'm saying they deserve to be slapped around the face until they have a clue and get with the times.
Thanks to synaesthesia from:
28th July 2011, 04:19 PM #19
As others have said - producers are missing the point of what people want.
If movies were easy to access (and not hindered by ridiculous DRM schemes as most services are now), reasonably priced, not full of nonsense 'DON'T PIRATE' adverts, and were worth their price then people would pay for them.
I regularly buy games on Steam and EA Origin - I've not bought a 'boxed' PC game for at least 5 years. I like the convenience of clicking 'buy' and it downloading in the next few hours. The only problem with these services is the pricing for newer games - £40 for a game is ridiculous. Much like the cost of cinema tickets are far too high, and dvd rentals (and as penfold_99 says, BT Vision rentals) are too high also. Just look at the profits the producers make - they are obviously charging too much if they are making so much profit, yet there is rife piracy.
I pay £9.99 a month for Spotify and I think that it is a brilliant system. Unlimited music, on computer, phone, ipod etc... wherever I am for a simple monthly fee. If movie producers could copy that business model to their products, and charged a decent price (I dunno, £25 a month seems like a reasonable price for unlimited movie viewings), they'd get themselves a solid continual income. I pay for the BT Vision film club because it provides me a list of movies I can watch 'free' each month, and the TV pack, as it provides me with a list of tv shows. The pricing for these is excellent - I just wish it was extended further.
Piracy shouldn't be seen as a 'threat', it should be seen as a flaw in their business model that needs fixing.
2 Thanks to localzuk:
synaesthesia (28th July 2011), ZeroHour (8th August 2011)
28th July 2011, 04:22 PM #20
I will use this in future Great line that sums it all up nicely.
Originally Posted by localzuk
28th July 2011, 04:50 PM #21
Not sure why they're targeting usenet... I would have thought torrents would be an easier target
Surely the usenet crowd could also be a good target for subscription services etc as most people making use of it will be paying for premium server access due to most ISP servers being about as much use as a chocolate tea pot(very few binary groups and retention measured in hours rather than days/years)
28th July 2011, 04:51 PM #22
The film and music industry itself doesn't appear to be a shining beacon of morality.
Two from TechDirt
Sad reading for artists and those too naive to understand slippery contracts.
Hollywood accounting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by jinnantonnixx; 28th July 2011 at 05:15 PM.
Thanks to jinnantonnixx from:
hicksonj (29th July 2011)
28th July 2011, 05:57 PM #23
How would they target torrents? They are inherently difficult to block due to their P2P nature. Add in the various distributed tracker technologies that exist too, and blocking that would be like trying to block a river with pebbles. Blocking websites is easy - we do it every day within our schools. Sure there are ways around most blocking systems, but for the majority it serves as a preventative measure.
Originally Posted by Jamman960
28th July 2011, 06:09 PM #24
Yup, its sickening. Its also one of the reasons why Trent Reznor no longer works with a label - when he released Ghosts I - IV, I happily paid for it, rather than downloaded it free. I knew that the money was actually going to the talent, not suits sitting in offices somewhere thinking of ways to rip off the little people even more. Record labels and movie studios are con artists, who cash in on the talents of others blinded by the promise of riches.
Originally Posted by jinnantonnixx
The only way musicians make real money today is by performing live.
28th July 2011, 06:33 PM #25
cinema costs are silly £8ish to watch a film that will be on dvd in 6 months for £12-15 why would you bother?
Originally Posted by synaesthesia
I really do object to those you wouldnt nick a car etc "adverts" unskippable at the start of the dvd the fact im watching it pretty much tells you ive bought it as any pirate version would cut that right out. I dont mind trailers etc on diskc but ffs put them on the disks menu so i can watch them if i want rather than being forced to watch them (and 2 years later i probably have all teh ones i want anyway)
I have a few bluerays with digital copies you need to install software to play them as they have the dreaded drm and why would i buy a hd version of the film but want an sd download version? (ok as an option but not as the only download)
Originally Posted by arwen
id argue that say jet set willy cost much less to program etc than call of duty/forza etc (though granted offset a bit by sales numbers) but still speccy games vs/console is a bit of am unfair comparison
Originally Posted by Gatt
28th July 2011, 06:51 PM #26
OK PC games (Pre PS1/XBOX so talking about win98 & first few years of XP here) avg £10-£15 with many under £15
Now, PC games are up in the £30 (if you can find them crammed into a corner somewhere in amongst the PS/XBox/Wii games!))
A Game for the PS3 or Xbox costs anywhere from £40-£50, yet the same game for the Wii or PC is about £20-£30 - How does that work?
This affects more than just one industry, and Games are freely copied, Consoles chipped, NOCD cracks for the PC
Trainers - walk into "Wyndsors" and you can get a damned good pair for £10-£20 - walk over the the "Nike" / "Addidas" / etc racks and its anywhere from £50 to £100+!!
Essentially you are paying for a name! And I have found that the pair from wyndsors lasts longer than the brand names!
The rest is down to Rip-Off Britain....
28th July 2011, 07:07 PM #27
But games have never been cheap. SNES games used to sell for £30-40...
Wii games are usually cheaper because of the limited nature of the console, the same game on the Wii and 360 will look awful on the Wii, which also won't be able to have DLC or have Xbox Live to back it up. Most PC games tend to be cheaper (though I have noticed a subtle raising in prices, mainly by EA) because the PC systems tend to be so much more expensive, and more often than not you're paying to mass beta test the product before the first patch comes out... Another strong reason for pirating I guess. But I've never known new PC games to be under the £25 mark the past 10 years.
Mind you, if you think Britain is bad for games, try being Australian! Getting expensive to be a gamer over there so I understand.
Really liked the coupon idea though, using the cinema experience as a direct sale for the Blu-Ray/Movie/Download sounds like a very good idea.
28th July 2011, 07:57 PM #28
It's quite simple really why music, games and movies are pirated and it all comes down to price. The price to go to the cinema is expensive (when you include a drink and some popcorn, although I could live without these ) and the price of a new Blu-ray is £15-£20. It just isn't realistic.
Clearly the people in the movie business do not understand how the internet or torrents work and whoever is consulting them should be binned immediately. I heard on the radio the other day that the merchandise from the film 'Cars' has generated over $5 billion US, so in theory they could of made the film at the cinema and the DVDs free, as it obviously didn't cost $5 billion US to make the film Cars.
Admittedly not every film created is a cash cow for merchandise, but realistically the only way forward is to seriously reduce prices. It's better to sell more at a lower price, rather than fewer at a higher price. You'll always make more money the first way.
By the time the movie industry takes every ISP to court (in the world) and allocates a ridiculous budget to try and 'combat' piracy; this is why they're losing money. Then these websites will register a new web address and create clones or mirrors of other torrent sites. Will they take all the ISPs to court again? Who knows, but I wish them luck as they're going to lose longterm.
29th July 2011, 05:41 AM #29
not to mention so much ill will people wont wont to buy from them
Originally Posted by Michael
29th July 2011, 10:49 AM #30
Well yes there is that, plus people are not daft. Everyone in their mind have a monetary worth or value for 'items' in life they wish to buy, from large purchases such as houses or cars to smaller purchases such as DVDs. £20 is too much for a single film (in my opinion) and this is why piracy is rocketing.
Originally Posted by sted
I'm not entirely sure why just the one torrent site is being targeted as there are thousands of torrent sites out there. It just isn't logical thinking, unless they're that naive the world piracy HQ is all being done from one website. I really hope someone one day from the movie industry wakes up and reads these forums!
By here_hare_here in forum Network and Classroom Management
Last Post: 21st February 2007, 09:27 AM
Last Post: 15th December 2006, 02:14 PM
By indiegirl in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Last Post: 14th June 2006, 02:25 PM
By timbo343 in forum Windows
Last Post: 21st March 2006, 11:38 PM
By mac_shinobi in forum Coding
Last Post: 26th August 2005, 01:29 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)