![]() | Register | FAQ | Members | Social Groups | User Map | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
General Chat General Chat forum sponsored by
From what you think about Billy G to what you think about your favourite beer. |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search Thread | Language |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #1 |
![]() | Any ideas? |
| |
| | #2 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Fylde, Lancs, UK.
Posts: 9,932
Thanks: 42
Thanked 230 Times in 209 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 67 | Amusingly I misread the title of this thread as 'Obesity policy'. Anyway, back to the point. Surely your standard 'school rules' covers this. Just because it involves a computer doesn't make it special. Failing that, your generic AUP should have a clause in it that covers this. Probably under 'misuse of computer equipment and resources'. |
| |
| | #3 | |
![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #4 | |
![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #5 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bath, B&NES
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | Our kids know that writing a naughty word into Word or Excel will get it logged. My predecessor used to drag every child into the office who did this, but personally unless it is being used in a derogatory way towards somebody else, i can't see the point. It tends to be mainly other kids doing it whilst their 'friends' aren't at the computer anyway. |
| |
| | #6 |
![]() | this reminds me of when i was at school and people used to write rude words and sentances in the middle of your work then save it so you would never know untill a teacher marked it hahaha it was funny at the time, i was glad of the old windows key + L lol not everyone had that common sense to lock there pc though |
| |
| | #7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bath, B&NES
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | We've disabled PC locking for students, otherwise you'd go in to a computer room at the start of a lesson after Year 11 had been in there and find 27 locked PCs. |
| |
| | #8 |
![]() | We have just given a test unit back to securus which also took a screen shot and added the ip address and the user. It looked good from the onset but failed in the fact it gave out a lot of false positives and when i approached our PLO (pupil link office) they just said it would create more work for them. Cost was also very expensive, quoted £6000 for three years. |
| |
| | #9 | |
![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #10 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bath, B&NES
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | Securus is very much about setting it up to suit your circumstances. Setting up a custom list of blacklisted words or phrases which directly affect you the most is the best way to do this, give these high severity scores, then sort by phrase severity in the view list. |
| |
| | #11 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Robert Mays School, Hampshire
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | I agree with jopijedd, If you think you are getting a lot of false positives, change the configuration to suit. It is customisable. Donna in tech support is always very helpful when you need to do this kind of thing! |
| |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| standalone policy | notaclue | Windows | 8 | 17-07-2007 12:24 AM |
| Anyone got a Policy for... | mattx | Windows | 1 | 17-01-2007 09:10 PM |
| Group policy etc | moiebus | Networks | 20 | 09-11-2006 12:48 AM |
| Policy Central | ind13 | Windows | 1 | 20-07-2006 10:48 AM |
| Images Policy | CheeseDog | Virtual Learning Platforms | 9 | 17-05-2006 01:12 PM |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search Thread |
|
|







