Last Episode was great![]()
The (very) spooky thing is that my wife and I had only just watched Vanilla Sky on Saturday - it had been on our PVR for months 8O
So - is he dead or back in coma or ....????
regards
Simon

Last Episode was great![]()
The (very) spooky thing is that my wife and I had only just watched Vanilla Sky on Saturday - it had been on our PVR for months 8O
So - is he dead or back in coma or ....????
regards
Simon
Yeah - I thought - oh no - they've killed off the series (tho' I wish some other programs would have the bottle and be so bold).
they were talking about it on the radio this morning, never heard of it until this morning!
Life On Mars for me captures the essence of television. Has a variety of comedy and action, aswell as diverse acting from characters I have previously seen in other series. I think it attracts a range of audiences , the 70's look good from where I am standing. I now know what life was like before the technology we all rely on to live our lives. Would be a good experience to use no technology but gotta have my technology so dependant on it. Oh by the way life on mars is said to have a spinoff with the dci Gene Hunt dont know how true this is. To answer your question I think 1973 was the fake reality while he was in a coma sounds most logical.
He's dead, he was having a heart attack when he changed the radio station at the end. Plus the girl in the test card turned off the telly at the end too - thus turning off his life.
They had to leave it in 1973, otherwise the sequal Ashes to Ashes would be pointless.
In my opinion the ending was bollox.
It was a cack ending... anyway, who in their right mind would choose to stay in '73 when they'd spent the entire two series trying to get back to the modern day??
I was a bit disappointed, but like Mattx says, leaving it in 73 assists with the roll on to the 1980s with the next episode... although I've heard that it's a similar format, just a girl this time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)