+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40
General Chat Thread, I think I've found a AV suite worse than Sophos.... in General; .....It's called Kaspersky - it's worse than Sophos, It really is - it's terrible......I thought my AV woes were sorted ...
  1. #1

    mattx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,240
    Thank Post
    1,058
    Thanked 1,068 Times in 625 Posts
    Rep Power
    740

    I think I've found a AV suite worse than Sophos....

    .....It's called Kaspersky - it's worse than Sophos, It really is - it's terrible......I thought my AV woes were sorted but now I've changed jobs and it's back to badly written AV suites. Shocking, so many false positives I don't know where to start and an interface that's about as much use as a skirting board ladder.

  2. #2

    MK-2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    3,237
    Thank Post
    149
    Thanked 581 Times in 307 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Rep Power
    199
    We've never really had a problem with Sophos here. Now Symantec/Norton is another kettle of bloated fish

  3. #3

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,135
    Thank Post
    1,908
    Thanked 1,343 Times in 742 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    395
    I like Kaspersky. It keeps telling me Windows 7 on my PC at home is a virus ;-)

  4. #4
    somabc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,337
    Thank Post
    83
    Thanked 388 Times in 258 Posts
    Rep Power
    111
    It's still better than Symantec!

  5. #5

    bossman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,905
    Thank Post
    1,186
    Thanked 1,057 Times in 749 Posts
    Rep Power
    328
    @mattx:

    Using Kaspersky here over the whole school and its working very well indeed, in fact its probably even better than our old AV which was very good over the 6 years that we used it.

    You twisty old git hehe! ;D

  6. Thanks to bossman from:

    mattx (13th April 2011)

  7. #6
    stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    88
    Thank Post
    29
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    Touching wood as I write this, we like MK-2 have never really had a problem with Sophos. It seems to run quite smoothly and updates the clients every hour.

  8. #7

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,843
    Thank Post
    876
    Thanked 1,679 Times in 1,459 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    444
    I have look at all sorts on AV products and never found one i can say it really good.

  9. #8

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,800
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,135 Times in 1,031 Posts
    Rep Power
    349
    Wait till you have to work with Mcaffe!

    it's awful but it only costs us 50 quid per year!

  10. #9

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,080
    Thank Post
    853
    Thanked 2,677 Times in 2,271 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    769
    AV is all terrible, Kaspersky detects everything, virus or not. Symantec detects almost nothing, NOD32 kills exchange and corrupts databases, Forefront Client Protection requires a datacenter running outdated OSs to run its server components. I have never uses Sophos but from the majority of reviews on here it is best avoided, CA ITM uses all the systems resources as quickly as it can to just run its own bloated interface and is a 50/50 gamble when it comes to protection, Mcafe I have not used for 5-6 years but unless they have throwen out what they had and started again I can't see it being much good.

    We should probably just format all of our HDs now and save the virus writers the trouble given the state of computer security on all avalible platforms.

  11. Thanks to SYNACK from:

    SimAda00 (13th April 2011)

  12. #10


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,580
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 854 Times in 733 Posts
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    I like Kaspersky. It keeps telling me Windows 7 on my PC at home is a virus ;-)
    sophos keeps doing that on my servers finding such things as robocopy (on 2008 so built in) as a virus and finding (randomly not always) smart board drivers as a virus on clients as it has a web server

  13. #11

    john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    10,513
    Thank Post
    1,493
    Thanked 1,050 Times in 919 Posts
    Rep Power
    302
    I don't mind Forefront, its much nicer and lighter than Sophos, even if you do need a DataCentre to run it all now (or just do as I am doing stick with the last generation as its working fine and will be for a good period of time until MS do the Light version of SCCM for it which I read somewhere is on the cards.

    For home users and other areas who don't want a MS product, Avast is a great tool and reasonably well priced for Education.

  14. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,753
    Thank Post
    79
    Thanked 288 Times in 219 Posts
    Rep Power
    85
    kaspersky mega borked for us, had to remove it manually from each machine in safe mode.

  15. #13
    cpjitservices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hessle
    Posts
    2,421
    Thank Post
    508
    Thanked 282 Times in 258 Posts
    Rep Power
    81
    Avast............................................. ..............................

  16. #14


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,411
    Thank Post
    184
    Thanked 356 Times in 285 Posts
    Rep Power
    148
    We had kaspersky for a year, hated every last minute of it and couldnt wait to get back on NOD. Even the home version is pants - it kept blocking all internet videos, so no youtube, iplayer, etc unless it was turned off, great

    I can honestly say I would have just preferred to have a virus, they do less damage!

  17. #15

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,652
    Thank Post
    516
    Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,891 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    831
    They do all seem dire. I've used Sophos, Symantec and CA eTrust ITM in corporate/education environments now and all 3 have issues:

    Sophos - resource hungry, had a habit of 'detecting' viruses and then just letting them install themselves
    Symantec - resource hungry is an understatement - installing it on a machine made me feel like I was now working on a 486.
    CA - Isn't 100% at getting the very latest in viruses (seems to be about a day or so behind the leaders), no safe mode interface due to the way they use a web server to run the interface, the 'call home' aspect for use with the management server seems to work in so much as it gets policies, but the server interface never reflects the real state of the network.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. There's only 1 thing worse...
    By elsiegee40 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2nd March 2009, 04:09 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •