General Chat Thread, UK infrastructure faces cyber threat, says GCHQ chief in General; I'm sorry but this is just ridiculous! The guy is going on about malicious worms and seams to think its ...
13th October 2010, 03:04 PM #1
UK infrastructure faces cyber threat, says GCHQ chief
I'm sorry but this is just ridiculous! The guy is going on about malicious worms and seams to think its a problem because they are in their "thousands". Also mentions Intellectual property theft as a big problem. What that has to do with GCHQ I have no idea.
BBC News - UK infrastructure faces cyber threat, says GCHQ chief
The UK's critical infrastructure - such as power grids and emergency services - faces a "real and credible" threat of cyber attack, the head of GCHQ says.
Last edited by zag; 13th October 2010 at 03:18 PM.
13th October 2010, 03:34 PM #2
It's scare mongering time at the moment, front page of the local paper last night warned of 'terrorist alerts' that enabled parents to pull children off trips to large cities. It's becoming a little americanised for my liking, it's basically saying "we think someone is going to do something but we don't have enough intelligence to know where it is going to be" EVERYBODY PANIC!
13th October 2010, 04:36 PM #3
a) it's the bbc - they'll print any old unsubstantiated rubbish / PR waffle as an "IT story".
b) FUD. A better, less sexy and less likely to be published storyline would be "The government gets targetted spam/malware too, news at 11".
13th October 2010, 05:50 PM #4
Well that's coz you're not a security geek: CSEG is part of GCHQ. Amongst many other things they certify pen-testers (CHECK) and more generally provide "advice and assistance on the security of communications and electronic data"
What that has to do with GCHQ I have no idea.
And for context I take it everyone has read the intimate details of Stuxnet (symantec paper) that all sorts of security orgs have been spinning for all its worth recently? There is at least some substance in the perceived threats.
PS: To make this more relevant I recall suggesting that BECTA security guidance was likely a watered-down-for-schools version of CSEG stuff for gov. Might not be the case, but the data security classification and tagging certainly made it look that way.
Last edited by PiqueABoo; 13th October 2010 at 06:26 PM.
By Michael in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 23rd September 2010, 01:05 PM
By mattx in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Last Post: 4th December 2009, 06:43 PM
By Lickhill in forum Network and Classroom Management
Last Post: 16th May 2009, 04:47 PM
By Butuz in forum EduGeek.net Site Problems
Last Post: 22nd October 2008, 04:10 PM
By FN-GM in forum IT News
Last Post: 3rd August 2008, 10:31 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)