+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
General Chat Thread, Pathetic - Apple challenges Woolworths logo in General; God some companies are just soooooo pathetic...... BBC NEWS | Business | Apple challenges Woolworths logo...
  1. #1

    mattx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,472
    Thank Post
    889
    Thanked 890 Times in 532 Posts
    Rep Power
    596

    Pathetic - Apple challenges Woolworths logo

    God some companies are just soooooo pathetic......

    BBC NEWS | Business | Apple challenges Woolworths logo

  2. IDG Tech News

  3. #2
    Gibbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,895
    Thank Post
    143
    Thanked 294 Times in 196 Posts
    Rep Power
    78
    Not as pathetic as Woolworths deliberately choosing this logo to give their new service loads of free publicity?

    /cynic

  4. #3
    alexsanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    101
    Thank Post
    21
    Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    8
    Lets face it - if anyone confuses those two logo's then they deserve to pay several hundred pounds for a mp3 player with low capacity, restricted accessibility, and lousy support so they can show off their touch screen...

    Apple. iDon't.

  5. 2 Thanks to alexsanger:

    Oops_my_bad (11th October 2009), webman (8th October 2009)

  6. #4

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little England
    Posts
    7,184
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thank Post
    1,550
    Thanked 1,105 Times in 606 Posts
    Rep Power
    282
    Yes, I saw this story about yet another iLawsuit...

  7. #5

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    2,889
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thank Post
    311
    Thanked 412 Times in 335 Posts
    Rep Power
    216
    It's not even vaguely similar. How long before Apple sue Granny Smith.

  8. Thanks to synaesthesia from:

    tech_guy (8th October 2009)

  9. #6
    t_h
    t_h is offline
    t_h's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    131
    Thank Post
    7
    Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
    Rep Power
    10
    I initially though it was a bit silly, but the head and tail of it is:

    Apple is reportedly concerned that the supermarket may start to make electronics products that would be in direct competition with its own offerings.
    When you consider that i.e. electronic goods with an apple logo on it, you can maybe see their point. At the end of the day you have to defend a trademark.

  10. #7

    mac_shinobi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,025
    Thank Post
    1,085
    Thanked 641 Times in 598 Posts
    Rep Power
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by t_h View Post
    I initially though it was a bit silly, but the head and tail of it is:



    When you consider that i.e. electronic goods with an apple logo on it, you can maybe see their point. At the end of the day you have to defend a trademark.
    2nd the trade mark thing and also also recall something about linksys or some company who made a phone called the iphone and there was a debate over that to some degree and also the palm pre who keep trying to use apples usb id to make the palm pre appear to be an ipod / iphone when they should be using there own software to do it as apple make software available to people such as palm and other companies so as to allow other devices to synch music etc as per below link

    MacUser: News: Palm reconnects Pre to iTunes

  11. #8
    markcuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    520
    Thank Post
    24
    Thanked 48 Times in 44 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    old news

    sure this was in the news ages ago in NZ

    anyway what about Kraft calling the new vegemite isnack 2.0

  12. #9

    mac_shinobi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,025
    Thank Post
    1,085
    Thanked 641 Times in 598 Posts
    Rep Power
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by markcuk View Post
    old news

    sure this was in the news ages ago in NZ

    anyway what about Kraft calling the new vegemite isnack 2.0
    Was only in my mail on mac news a day or two ago as its the third or fourth time they done it

  13. #10
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,932
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by markcuk View Post
    old news

    sure this was in the news ages ago in NZ

    anyway what about Kraft calling the new vegemite isnack 2.0
    i hope the new decade ushers in a new era where companies don't prepend a word with the letter 'i' for anything vaguely technological. 'i' usurped using 'e' before everything, and now they'll be looking for a new letter besides 'i' once they realise apple and others have pretty much staked anything worth putting an 'i' infront of.

    i personally like the use of the letter 'l' becuase the non-capitalised l can be mistaken for a capital I. So hopefully someone will have the good sense to release the lphone. Not to be confused with the Iphone.

  14. #11

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little England
    Posts
    7,184
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thank Post
    1,550
    Thanked 1,105 Times in 606 Posts
    Rep Power
    282
    Today I got up, had an ibreakfast, drank a cup of icoffee, drove to work in my icar, and spent a day doing iwork. I spent my ilunchbreak doing some ishopping and iflirting with an icolleague. I made numerous phone calls which were not on an iphone, and sent about 50 emails which were sent using a non ipc. I ate an apple which later I ipooed down the iloo with everything else I had iconsumed during the iday. I'm now waiting for an ilawsuit?

  15. #12
    torledo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,932
    Thank Post
    168
    Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    Today I got up, had an ibreakfast, drank a cup of icoffee, drove to work in my icar, and spent a day doing iwork. I spent my ilunchbreak doing some ishopping and iflirting with an icolleague. I made numerous phone calls which were not on an iphone, and sent about 50 emails which were sent using a non ipc. I ate an apple which later I ipooed down the iloo with everything else I had iconsumed during the iday. I'm now waiting for an ilawsuit?
    that's a copyright infringement right there, i'd venture.

  16. #13

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,284
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    598
    Thanked 879 Times in 617 Posts
    Rep Power
    287
    If Apple base their logo off a piece of common fruit, then in my opinion they have no claim to the use of potentially similar-looking logos.

    If Apple's logo had more uniqueness about it and then Woolworths started manufacturing electronic goods (e.g. selling products in the same market) - only then should Apple start shouting foul play.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Blunkett challenges IT education 'stranglehold'
    By CyberNerd in forum BETT 2012
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16th January 2009, 02:23 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26th November 2008, 01:05 PM
  3. Apple fans roast Apple fans
    By mattx in forum General Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 14th March 2008, 12:23 PM
  4. Please Help - What are the challenges and opportunities faci
    By doc69 in forum School ICT Policies
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20th May 2007, 07:28 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •