General Chat Thread, The Swine Flu Thread in General; *Activates Zombie Apocalypse disaster recovery plan*...
-
29th April 2009, 02:13 PM #46 *Activates Zombie Apocalypse disaster recovery plan*
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
29th April 2009, 02:18 PM #47 
Originally Posted by
jamesb
I remember reading somewhere (or misreading, who knows) that a virus can nowadays travel around the world within about three days.
Those with a pandemic potential can, like swine flu!
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:28 PM #48 
Originally Posted by
jamesb
I remember reading somewhere (or misreading, who knows) that a virus can nowadays travel around the world within about three days.
That's on a Ryanair flight, right?
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:34 PM #49 Not ryanair - it would be charged extra surely?
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:36 PM #50 You say those statistics as if they're small, but apply that to real people and that is 46.9million people dead if the same percentages were used today...
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:49 PM #51 
Originally Posted by
localzuk
You say those statistics as if they're small, but apply that to real people and that is 46.9million people dead if the same percentages were used today...
Which will take almost a third of a year to make up in new births!
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:49 PM #52 Based on a population of the UK from wiki 61,612,300 (2009 estimate)
28percent infected (from earlier spanish flu stats)
2.5% of infected died
Total losses in similar scenario are 462092
That's four hundred and sixty two thousand and ninty two
That's a little over half the population of Leeds
2.5% of 28% sounds like nothing until you stick it into real people numbers.
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:50 PM #53 That small percentage doesn't seem so insignificant if you or your family are one of them!
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:57 PM #54 
Originally Posted by
localzuk
apply that to real people and that is 46.9million people dead
150k in the US, 700k in the US, compared to 20 million in India shows its very dependant on the quality of life. Considering this was also at the same time as a world war and at a time of great poverty, even for the western nations has serious effect on the ability to contain and treat the disease.
Keep in mind the natural death rate the last 100 years in the UK has dropped from 25k per Million to around 8k and the majority of deaths coming before they are 45 to over 65.
The current 'natual' death rate of InFLUenza in the US is around 60k per year.
Cancer and heart disease kills more than 600k each in the US now.
Theorising how many deaths that may happen now is all well and good, but theres a big difference between 1918 and 2009.
Finally there is still no proof the current swine influenza has the ability to transverse humans yet.
Last edited by Theblacksheep; 29th April 2009 at 03:06 PM.
-
-
29th April 2009, 02:58 PM #55 
Originally Posted by
TwoZeroAlpha
Based on a population of the UK from wiki 61,612,300 (2009 estimate)
28percent infected (from earlier spanish flu stats)
2.5% of infected died
Total losses in similar scenario are 462092
That's four hundred and sixty two thousand and ninty two
That's a little over half the population of Leeds
2.5% of 28% sounds like nothing until you stick it into real people numbers.
But that's only half of Leeds - what about the other half?
-
-
29th April 2009, 03:02 PM #56 First US swine flu death; school closings possible - Examiner.com
Which raises the question if the government shuts the do schools due to a public health emergency do we still get paid?
Last edited by JJonas; 29th April 2009 at 03:12 PM.
-
-
29th April 2009, 03:04 PM #57 
Originally Posted by
Theblacksheep
There is still no proof the current swine influenza has the ability to transverse humans yet.
WHO has classed this as phase 4 of the pandemic level. Their site clearly explains what that means.
Phase 4 is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.” The ability to cause sustained disease outbreaks in a community marks a significant upwards shift in the risk for a pandemic.
-
-
29th April 2009, 03:06 PM #58 
Originally Posted by
TechMonkey
As I said above, the 1918 pandemic, although pretty bad, wasn't all that when the facts are looked at. Globally 2.5% of people infected died, so 97.5 people survived. & only 28% of people were infected at all. This was in 1918! I think we should be a lot better prepared and sorted now.
With the ability to travel faster these days the number of people you come into contact with in a day is vastly increased compared to an equivalent person in 1918 meaning the potential audience for transmission is far greater. Considering the quantity of people who have had the virus I would say that its pretty likely that it is transmitting between humans, unless all these people had contact with the one potential farm its supposed to have come from.
-
-
29th April 2009, 03:07 PM #59 
Originally Posted by
JJonas
hope so cus my landlord doesn't shut
-
-
29th April 2009, 03:08 PM #60 
Originally Posted by
ascott2
WHO has classed this as phase 4 of the pandemic level. Their site clearly explains what that means.
Phase 4 is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal OR human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.”
You failed to read their clearly explained site or mark in bold the big 'OR' in your quote.
Its infectedpig->human. There is still no proof it can transverse humans yet.
Last edited by Theblacksheep; 29th April 2009 at 03:11 PM.
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By RabbieBurns in forum General Chat
Replies: 76
Last Post: 10th January 2010, 06:53 PM
-
By contink in forum Hardware
Replies: 13
Last Post: 17th January 2009, 09:41 PM
-
By RabbieBurns in forum Scotland
Replies: 3
Last Post: 18th September 2008, 03:04 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules