Where do we draw the line?
Do we have a special area for 'respected' members ... people we know and trust and are happy that they know what they are talking about and are the uber-edugeeks? We already have people worried that there are cliques and that people are treated differently ...
And what would we talk about in there that we would not talk about elsewhere? Rants about suppliers? I thought people were happy now that it isn't rants that make things better but constructive criticism (or name and shame). Security concerns? Refer back to my previous post about obscurity ... all we can do is add a layer of obfustication which is why the security forum is not a public feed and not indexed by google search.
The one thing that we do have an issue with is spam, and verification is handy there ... but a lot of work.
When we have 15-30 new members a day it is a chunk of time to do verification.
I am not ruling it out ... and no doubt the other admins and mods are happy to chat about how they feel about it (I'll go and get some discussion going about it) but personally I can't see much to gain from it, but happy to have someone try and change my view.
god might as well make this place for mods and admins only at this rate!!
I like the idea.
Lets say I had a problem on my network and I needed help with it, but it would involve giving up information on the network setup then you could post in the private forum and the trusted and verified techs can help and you can get a good nights sleep safe in the knowledge that no pupils/staff have got access to the information.
I'm not sure how you could do the verification, but I think this idea has a lot of potential!
The main concern was not with where people were from but that they knew their stuff. Not sure whether that would work ... and if it is sustainable.
@grumbledook The site does seem to be heading that way a little bit
Just a word of caution for this, the more information that is collected the more chance there is for something to go wrong. Members have already had to quit the forum because their details got out. Its not that I don't trust the site or the people who run it or anything like that but the mere presence of the data increases the danger.
There have already been attempts to hack the site - admittedly to use it a a proxy - and this would make it an even more tempting and valuable target. The other thing is that all it would take would be one weak link in the system to cause trouble, one volunteer checker with a grudge or compromised email for all hell to break loose.
I think that although it could be useful it would cause a large administrative burden and put a lot more of a burden on the site than anyone has predicted.
There is also a strange sense of security that comes with being anonymous that enables people to participate that otherwise may not be able to. The demonizing of students is also a dangerous path as there may well be be students that are able to provide value to the forum. The forum came along after I had left school but if it had been around back then it would have been useful to me and I could have been useful to it as I was in fact supporting some school computers. Drawing lines is sometimes necessary but it should be considered very carefully.
Last edited by SYNACK; 23rd November 2008 at 02:05 PM.
I'm a student, but im not here to find vulnerabilities in peoples networks and exploit them and look for proxies...although i understand all students arnt like me.
But i think the having a verified status section would reduce posts on the public forums which would make things more boring for people like me who wouldn't be able to get in there
Dear god no. Don't just jump into the site and try to change it, it runs perfectly fine, dos_box and the other mods have a good model for user viewing.
Tough luck if students are viewing, there's not alot they can do. Not forgetting, majority of viewers are googlers with no accounts.
Don't like the mechanism, don't complain.
EDIT: Don't make this an elitist contest, because your a NM, and want everyone to know that, there's no difference on these forums between the roles, we all come here for the same reason. If the site ever became elitist like that, I'd surely leave. I don't care about your position in a school, or the fact you want to show it off. Were all on equal grounds on this site
Last edited by ahuxham; 24th November 2008 at 09:23 AM.
I don't think this is very feasable from an admin perspective tbh.
I don't think that this is really about elitism ... more a case that some are conerned that they cannot freely share some of the information they would like to due to it being read or used by those who it is not appropriate for, possibly due to security implications, possibly due to the need to discuss sensitive issues around competency of users (staff and students) within their specific school or simply because they want to get information from those that they know are doing the same job or have the same responsibility. The last bit may come across elitist but I think in this case it is just a sense of wanting to weed out the enthusiast from the experienced.
Anyway ... the site is always for discussion ... it is just that some suggestions can't be done due to time, costs, man hours, legal issues, are just plain silly, have been tried before and didn't work then or DB prefers to leave it as it is.
Okay I feel the need to straighten thing's out immediately. I have clearly suggested something which has been discussed in the past, the idea of which was laid to rest due to time/management requirements. However, since that discussion time has passed. I was not aware of the previous discussion, but, I made my suggestion.
The idea is very simple: a "secure" "verified" forum section for "verified" ICT Technicians and Network Managers who work in education in addition to the currently available forums. This idea would not aim to "change" the current format of EduGeek, nor would it attempt to undermine the excellent work and support the current Administrators put in to EduGeek. It would not be compulsory/it would be optional.
Yes EduGeek is a resource - that said we all know how hard it is to manage networks, the time it takes and the dedication it requires. Some discussions on this forum may have at some point in the past, or may at some point in the future require a more "secure" "verified" discussion between professionals.
Why should we as those professionals point out security holes/circumvention websites in such an "un-secure" way which actually feeds exploits to the end users of not only our own networks but to the end users of others.
My aim has been simple from post #1: to establish feedback on whether people thought this would be a good idea or not.
Yes there is the issue of how do we "verify" people. This could be done via multiple methods - phone calls, html/php uploads to a web server, email confirmation to generic office@ school emails, fax then a follow up call etc
Yes there is the argument of you could find this information somewhere else, maybe you could, but again, do we really need to list the latest exploits for the end users of other networks?
The majority of forums are related to technical discussions - security discussions are accessible to all registered members - so let's consider the idea of security/exploit/circumvention discussions for "verified" EduTech's. It's not a competition of elitist ism, it's not an aim to make EduGeek become Administrators/Moderators only.
It's an idea to make some people's lives easier (who do our jobs and who aren't EduGeek members or who are EduGeek members but don't check back every day) and further develop EduGeek to a standing where exploit and circumvention related content is for "verified" EduTech's only.
I don't want to read another post about elitism or showing off, reducing the appearance of EduGeek or people going to leave EduGeek because Technology is possibly changing. This is IT - there's years of change to come and EduGeek's aim from day #1 I imagine was always to keep up to date with IT in Education.
Now let's all buck up and act like professionals. This isn't a "rip the idea apart discussion", "get all bitchy about a discussion".
This is a discussion between people who help to shape the future of young people, care about education, care about their networks and strive to work with others in the same field achieving the best standards possible.
/rant over - it had to be said.
Last edited by DG01; 24th November 2008 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Spelling Mistake
Whilst I agree in principle, I think that there are always ways to speak in private to members whose posts lead you to believe that they can help you with your particular 'sensitive' issue.
At one point I was in favour of removing students but I have come to realise that they are able to get the info elsewhere and that most of them on this site are genuinely here because they want to learn about IT, not be subversive.
<snipped> The discussion is drawing to a close now ... time to calm down and take things as offered. Ideas for discussion, without prejudice or otherwise. [GD]
Last edited by GrumbleDook; 24th November 2008 at 10:25 PM. Reason: At request of witch
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)