There was a digitalspy article yesterday about this, saying this is in fact wrong, and at the moment they don't have any immediate plans to spy on their users; i'd get the link but i'm having some troubles with loading pages..
At the point they become a lackey for the RIAA, my business will go elsewhere on point of principle.
I find it odd that Virgin are making noises about this sort of thing, but recently re-instated various newsgroups like alt.b.m.m. whose sole purpose is to distribute media files! (Unless it's some sort of honey trap.)
how exactly will they monitor it?
if its newsgroups, then a lot of newsgroup providers offer secure transfers now.
also how will they verify the exact files? i could download a file called hello.txt which i then rename to whatever.mp3 - and likewise if i download a file called whatever.mp3, wouldn't virgin have to prove that that specific mp3 is an actual copyrighted mp3 from an artist and not just a renamed file.
on the flipside, i noticed this.....a possibility?
Written by Guy Dixon
vnunet.com, 01 Apr 2008
Virgin Media and BPI deny 'deal' :: HEXUS.channel - The online home of the UK technology channel
Like I said, it's been claimed to be incorrect..
The digitalspy link: Cable - News - Virgin denies 'three strikes' agreement - Digital Spy
Last edited by dgsmith; 2nd April 2008 at 05:41 PM.
I will have a chat with my neighbour tonight, he worked for NTL/virgin for a number of years on the broadband side as an engineer at HQ in the north east. Will ask him what he thinks, and how it could be done.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)