General Chat Thread, ISP with no traffic shaping in General; Originally Posted by kmount
Yes, I'd agree with that, but I do like how they assign firewall rules by MAC ...
4th February 2008, 04:43 PM #16
mutual feelings on the GUI
Originally Posted by kmount
4th February 2008, 07:03 PM #17
I use be here also.
They don't do traffic shaping and I think it costs an extra £5 for a static IP.
4th February 2008, 10:23 PM #18
I'll think you'd be hard pressed to find any ISP who truly doesn't shape
Talk about wanting the moon on a stick for £19.99 a month
5th February 2008, 10:05 AM #19
Tiscali is one of the worst.
Tecnical support will lie to you non stop about why you are paying for an 8meg service that tops out at 512kb in the evenings when you are 800m away from the exchange, your attenuation and snr are well within top limits for adsl max, your router is connected at 7612kbs and that you can download at 7000kbs in the morning. (http traffic, not p2p)
I have been called all sorts of things because I know what I am talking about. I have been told that my line does not support more than 2000kbs (which was funny when I tested the line when he was on the phone after 10pm and got 4000bps).
I am planning on taking them to court some time soon, to cancel the contract and claim back all of the money paid to them. Then to go back to BT. I have also made two complaints to ofcom.
5th February 2008, 10:13 AM #20
Good luck, but sadly as your line has at no point dropped below the minimal accepted speeds you may struggle. ADSL being a contended service etc yadda yadda...
Tiscali bought my isp out and its been nothing but pants since.
5th February 2008, 10:57 AM #21
Who is your ISP kmount? I'm with Freedom2Surf, now ultimately owned by Tiscali. I haven't noticed any serious loss of quality, but then again I hardly ever use it heavily these days, don't use P2P so much.
I would like the luxury though, if I ever need to, would you suggest I jump ship?
5th February 2008, 11:28 AM #22
Tiscali bought out my ISP (Pipex) back in September, and last Sunday night / Monday my connection was switched from Pipex hardware to Tiscali. My connection was throttled and port-filtered from 19:30 to 22:00 every night - port jenga revealled that the Eve cluster was up and taking logons.
In 4 years with Pipex, I never had connection issues and I phoned them once to change some payment details. In 3 days, Tiscali annoyed me sufficiently to phone them up (30 mins and 45 mins on the phone at 10p/minute) and request my MAC code so I could replace them. It would seem that quite a lot of Pipex customers are doing the same.
5th February 2008, 02:31 PM #23
I have proof going back since I signed up, showing that they throttle the speed in the evenings.
Originally Posted by kmount
Also they can get away with a slower speed if the line is not capable of higher speeds, but if they fail to provide the service they are paid for to save money, then they are in breah of contract.
They will not contest in small claims court.
Last edited by ICT_GUY; 5th February 2008 at 02:35 PM.
5th February 2008, 02:47 PM #24
I'm with Metronet and can't say I have any complaints even though they do use traffic shaping - they're totally transparent about what traffic is shaped, when and why. The logic is good and it means I do get great browsing speeds over the normally busy evening periods - then if you're that way inclined you can thrash P2P from midnight till 4PM. The only drastic slowdown I've noticed even with shaping in place is usenet traffic in the evenings being painfully slow.
Sadly, they don't offer the same package I'm on anymore (8mbit/100GB monthly usage cap for £22) or I'd recommend them without hesitation...
By drewp in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 1st February 2008, 10:11 AM
By ITWombat in forum School ICT Policies
Last Post: 17th February 2007, 06:23 PM
By Peter in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 9th January 2006, 12:34 AM
By shane_southampton in forum Windows
Last Post: 13th September 2005, 11:12 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)