+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
General Chat Thread, Standardising Underground Maps To Make Them Easily Understood in General; ...
  1. #1

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    9,236
    Thank Post
    352
    Thanked 1,330 Times in 915 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1188

    Standardising Underground Maps To Make Them Easily Understood

    Link: : INAT metro maps

    ABOUT INAT METRO MAPS

    INAT is a mapping standard developed by French Serbian architect Jug Cerovic offering easy to read, easy to memorize and easy to use subway network maps.

    EASY TO READ

    The croweded central area of most cities is enlarged to make room for the multiplicity of lines and connecting stations.

    A standard set of symbol is applied to all maps : line colors, stations, connections, line and station labeling.

    Line angles are gently curved for a smooth familiar look.

    EASY TO MEMORIZE

    All lines are represented vertical, horizontal, or 45° inclined.
    Most lines feature no more than 5 bends on their entire length.
    Highly symbolic shapes are used for specific features:
    Rings: circle (Moscow, Paris), rectangle (Beijing, Shanghai), stadium shaped (Berlin, Seoul), parallelogram (London)
    Regularly spaced straight parallel lines in gridded street pattern cities (New York, Mexico)
    Symmetry (Moscow)
    Specific shapes (Madrid)

    EASY TO USE

    All text is labelled in both local and Latin characters.
    The maps are design so as to be legible on small sized prints for pocket use and suitable for display on a wide array of supports.

    All contents of this website are protected by copyright.
    Using these rules as a guide his London Underground map looks like this:


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    172
    Thank Post
    42
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    29
    I think that map is harder to understand than the current one they use in london

  3. #3

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    9,236
    Thank Post
    352
    Thanked 1,330 Times in 915 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1188
    Quote Originally Posted by chrisateen View Post
    I think that map is harder to understand than the current one they use in london
    It does seem busier, somehow, but is that just familiarity with Harry Beck's LU map?

    This is an attempt to create a standard format for all underground maps so that visitors to cities with underground transit systems will not be thrown when presented with a local map.

  4. #4
    mjs_mjs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    bexleyheath, london
    Posts
    1,021
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 111 Times in 95 Posts
    Rep Power
    37
    I think we should keep our old LU map - it's almost a defining feature, also the zoning on a LU map atm is very easy - it's not so easy on this.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    107
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    6
    Then you could argue all the signs in the underground should be standardised, like those in an airport.

    I can never understand tube maps in other country's, ours is the best.

  6. #6

    dhicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    5,724
    Thank Post
    1,287
    Thanked 797 Times in 693 Posts
    Rep Power
    239
    I think that's the first time I've seen the overground loop actually look like a loop, where you can see how it circles London. It still manges to miss most of south London's train network, though - with an Oyster card it's pretty much interchangeable with the tube these days, and from the above map you'd never guess Clapham Junction or Wimbledon are major stations with trains into central London every few minutes.

  7. #7

    Oaktech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bournemouth
    Posts
    3,075
    Thank Post
    882
    Thanked 608 Times in 477 Posts
    Rep Power
    281
    I really like that map. It makes far more sense to me than the standard one.

  8. #8
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    4,371
    Thank Post
    875
    Thanked 411 Times in 311 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61
    Rep Power
    314
    That bottom right corner is awful. The existing Tube map is vaguely geographically accurate (hence the uproar when they removed the Thames) as you look at a station and know roughly where they are in London. According to this map, Beckton is in the South and the Thames takes a steep curve downward. It's terrible!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    222
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    Watford isn't east of Uxbridge, it's north! Not the best, however it makes some kind of sense?

  10. #10

    DaveP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Can't talk now: The mother-ship is calling!
    Posts
    9,236
    Thank Post
    352
    Thanked 1,330 Times in 915 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    1188
    Quote Originally Posted by Homer View Post
    Watford isn't east of Uxbridge, it's north! Not the best, however it makes some kind of sense?
    These types of maps are intended to be helpful getting you from Station A to Station B. When you are using the system where you are geographically does not matter only how to get to your intended station. I can see that if these maps were also geographically accurate that might help at either end of the journey but that would also add to the visual complexity of the maps when simplicity is a main objective.

  11. #11

    Garacesh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,223
    Thank Post
    1,206
    Thanked 476 Times in 347 Posts
    Rep Power
    235
    Heh.. Hehehe.. Cockfosters

    Personally I'd just prefer a geographically-accurate map, given that half the time, on a network of this scale - I've no clue what station I'm supposed to be at anyway (I'm not so good with planning journeys..)



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Tilting laptops to make them work
    By Ric_ in forum Hardware
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 4th April 2012, 10:14 PM
  2. Mandatory Profiles, How to make them?
    By ravenadsl in forum Windows 7
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 27th February 2012, 10:47 AM
  3. Damn JPEG's....how small to make them...
    By kennysarmy in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 21st June 2011, 12:57 PM
  4. Updates for ProDesktop - where to get them?
    By tarquel in forum Windows
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 19th May 2008, 04:55 PM
  5. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 31st August 2005, 08:46 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •