General Chat Thread, The Big Benefits Row in General; @ AlexB illbridgenorth I find your attitude a little bit scary to be honest. The mere fact you used the ...
4th February 2014, 03:23 PM #91
@AlexBillbridgenorth I find your attitude a little bit scary to be honest. The mere fact you used the Stephen Hawking example shows that you think ALL disabled people can work no matter what is wrong with them. With the best will in the world Mr Hawking probably has had better finance and care in his life which ENABLED him to continue. Can your ordinary poor bugger in a chair say the same? There is such a thing as differentiation what one person can cope with someone else may well not. I totally agree with you regarding 'them that CHOOSE not to work' but unless there are changes to the whole welfare system these people will continue to milk it for all it's worth.
4th February 2014, 03:25 PM #92
The "Nazi" comments, I guess are talking about Eugenics. Worth looking up. If it wasn't for the fact that Hitler demonstrated the ulimate horror of Eugenics I think it would be common practice today. You have to consider that both Roosavelt and Churchill were once supporters of it. People would have just swallowed what the government of the day put out in an attempt to socially engineer a consensus and we'd have grown up with the idea and accepted it as normal, well most of us would....
4th February 2014, 03:26 PM #93
But even then if you do research theres no actual real world evidence. Like I said my girlfriends mother is playing the system by saying she is depressed. Just because someone states they have a problem and get the doctor to agree with something that isn't true doesn't mean they are not cheating the system. Under the governments and statistics eyes my girlfriends mum isn't doing any kind of Benefit fraud as it has all been confirmed by the doctor but the actual truth is she is. I know far too often of people that do this especially where I come from, even to the extent of having more kids just so they can get more benefit money in a sense that's cheating the system. I somehow don't believe only 1% of benefit frauds out there and we will never find the true answer because if you're a good fraud you'll never get found out and actually look genuine!
Originally Posted by LosOjos
4th February 2014, 03:29 PM #94
No they can't and I understand that some people can't but also some can and are more than capable and by them saying I have a bad back should not be excuse to be able to go on benefits.
Originally Posted by ButterflyMoon
4th February 2014, 03:35 PM #95
From Official gov.uk site:
Originally Posted by LosOjos
This National Statistics report has been published according to the arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority.
The report estimates fraud and error levels in the benefit system in Great Britain:
for 2012 to 2013 it is estimated that 2.1% of total benefit expenditure was overpaid due to fraud and error, the same as the 2011 to 2012 estimate
the estimated value of overpayments is £3.5 billion, which is a rise from the 2011 to 2012 estimated value of £3.4 billion
for 2012 to 2013 it is estimated that 0.9% of total benefit expenditure was underpaid due to fraud and error, which is a rise from the 2011 to 2012 estimate (0.8%)
the estimated value of underpayments is £1.6 billion, which is a rise from the 2011 to 2012 estimated value of £1.3 billion
The report includes Employment and Support Allowance official error estimates.
These statistics have recently been assessed by the UK Statistics Authority.
If you have any comments, questions or any general queries regarding our publication, please email the Fraud and Error Measurement Analysis Team
Next release: May 2014.
4th February 2014, 03:36 PM #96
I honestly believe that most people in this country want to work for a living. There are those that don't and will find ways and means of not doing so but they are the minority and should be treated as such. My major issue with this whole debate is how exaggerated a problem it is.
Here's an interesting article from Citizen's Advice Scotland (
remember when they were state funded? my mistake, they still receive some funding just not as much as they once did): Myth-busting: the real figures on benefit fraud | Citizens Advice Scotland
@HallX - yes, 2.1% for fraud and error i.e. overpayments due to mistakes in the application or administrative errors, all/most of which is recovered. Have a look at that article I just posted for more details.
Last edited by LosOjos; 4th February 2014 at 03:44 PM.
4th February 2014, 03:38 PM #97
I think maybe I didn't word my post very well. I think what am trying to say is this @AlexBillbridgenorth what makes you qualified to actually KNOW how bad someone back is or why they are on benefits. Have you got a medical background or do you work on the side for Atos. It is just your posts come over very judgemental I am sorry if I have misread them if this is not the case. Yes agreed there are shysters that buck the system but very many people have health issues that stop them from working for whatever reason.
4th February 2014, 03:42 PM #98
Yep and people will always have their own opinions so this debate will go on forever and it's a sensitive subject for the media to twist! This is what causes these problems in the first place! For me it's just about prioritising what's most important and when it's my money given to these people I damn well like to know what's going on with it and at the end of the day if they choose to spend more on fags, booze and the latest gadgets then they do food and essentials that is my personal morels stepping in and saying it is wrong. So please don't take what I have said in the post literally the subject winds me up and like most of the public your defence mechanism gets higher and higher. I'm a nice person honestly
Thanks to abillybob from:
ButterflyMoon (4th February 2014)
4th February 2014, 03:49 PM #99
There's a difference between having a bad back, and having a back condition that prevents you from walking, sitting etc. There can be issues like being in too much pain or neurological conditions like narcolepsy (not recognised as a work preventing issue) that WILL prevent you from working or holding down a full time job.
Originally Posted by alexbillbridgnorth
What is society if it does not help those in need to live? If you do not provide a safety net for people that cannot go to work, you'll simply having people dying on the streets (which you do, but lets ignore them because they are beggars and scroungers). Lets ignore the people driven to suicide due to cuts in benefits.
Someone I know was forced to go 25miles to a "free" work placement to get his benefits. They refused to allow him to work for a charity in his town. Can you run a car to do 50 miles a day on benefits as well as rent, food, heating and living? No. He refused as he would be out of pocket and is now removed from the government statistics on the unemployed. He now does cash in hand jobs to survive.
You're living in government/dailymail fairy land if you think being on benefits is some kind of fag smoking, beer drinking luxury.
It may happen to you and if it does you'll be pissed off the amount of ignorant ***** that think anyone that isn't a quadropedic isnt fit for work and is scrounging off the measly amount you pay in tax.
Our money isn't just here to go to war, pay serco for private prisons and prop up banks. We pay tax for a reason, the entire social system is being destroyed without reducing the tax collected reduced to compensate to pay for war debts. We are being manipulated, well some of us are.
Last edited by Theblacksheep; 4th February 2014 at 03:56 PM.
4 Thanks to Theblacksheep:
ButterflyMoon (4th February 2014), Earthling (5th February 2014), LosOjos (4th February 2014), tmcd35 (4th February 2014)
4th February 2014, 03:49 PM #100
Thank you for this... Now can some one explain to me why the co-Attrition Government are not cutting the budget by 2.1%
Originally Posted by HallX
Budget for 2013 £159Bn, that's with £7Bn already cut and a further £10bn on the way. That's over 10%, some benefits like Housing benefit are being cut by 14%.
Stop being manipulated, get informed This is not about cutting fraud! You are being manipulated so there is a ground swell of opinion. They need a consenus and now you are doing Cameron's job for him!
4th February 2014, 03:52 PM #101
Please read my previous post! I have been a bit out of order at some points and don't think like I have portrayed at all, it's when topics like this it gets my back up as I experience it first hand with my girlfriends parents I don't think that everyone with a disability should go to work can I please just clarify this!
Originally Posted by Theblacksheep
4th February 2014, 03:53 PM #102
I really hope that you don't end up as "one of these people". Many people find themselves on disability after working for decades. And if you do you, that will "Damn well" show me your finances or lack there of so I can apply my own personal morals to how you choose to spend what little you have...
Originally Posted by alexbillbridgnorth
4th February 2014, 03:56 PM #103
If I ever have to go on benefits for some reason! I will make sure I myself prioritise what I spend the money on food, gas, electric etc... shouldn't everyone? As long as I could get by that's what I'd spend my money on! This comment makes no sense and you personally couldn't choose what I spent my money on but the government can as far as I'm concerned it's their money not mine.
Originally Posted by GeekyPete
4th February 2014, 06:20 PM #104
I'm far from jealous, just so you know.
Originally Posted by Earthling
4th February 2014, 06:21 PM #105
The argument about the "deserving" and "undeserving" poor is such a waste of time - the question is what do you want to do about people who have not (for any reason) got a job - are you going to provide some sort of welfare so they don't starve on the street or are you happy to let that happen?
If the latter, then there's nothing further to be discussed.
If the former, you can start to think about how much.
Sanctioning people because you don't like their attitude or choices is pointless whenever there are fewer jobs than the number of unemployed, in fact the lazy or feckless person is providing a service by not competing for the small number of jobs that there actually are.
Really there is no logical reason to be annoyed or upset with them until there are unfilled vacancies and all the other people have got jobs - that's when you would be justified in having a crackdown on people who are not working.
By ChrisH in forum Gaming
Last Post: 17th October 2011, 05:18 PM
By dgsmith in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 15th November 2008, 09:03 PM
By beeswax in forum General Chat
Last Post: 1st July 2008, 06:53 AM
By Dos_Box in forum General EduGeek News/Announcements
Last Post: 6th February 2006, 01:19 AM
By StewartKnight in forum Hardware
Last Post: 3rd August 2005, 02:15 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)