+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 193
General Chat Thread, Cameron is at it again..... in General; Will Google pull out of the UK? Does Cameron really think that child abuse images are easily found with a ...
  1. #46

    plexer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    12,997
    Thank Post
    590
    Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,346 Posts
    Rep Power
    398
    Will Google pull out of the UK?

    Does Cameron really think that child abuse images are easily found with a google search?

    If it was that easy I'm sure Google would have already fixed it but the answer is that no it's not.

    Ben

  2. #47


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,233
    Thank Post
    218
    Thanked 813 Times in 695 Posts
    Rep Power
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by sonofsanta View Post
    I'm paraphrasing, but I was shown this quote on an e-safety course, and I quite liked it:
    To keep our children safe around swimming pools we can install fences, wire up pool alarms, provide life jackets and supervise our children constantly. Or we can teach our children to swim.
    It's the best analogy I've heard for the issue of online safety.
    or just remove the water and fill the hole with playground tiles which seems closer to what they are trying to do

  3. #48
    Sirbendy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,298
    Thank Post
    8
    Thanked 202 Times in 153 Posts
    Rep Power
    109
    I shall be opting out. I don't want external filtering, and I'm damn sure it'll play hob with the missus webdev stuff somehow. As far as the kids go, when they're old enough for me to worry, I've got an R-Pi running dansguardian that I can bring in to do the rudimentary stuff, and educate them for the rest. I pay for internet access, not a partial version thereof. Unless of course they're willing to allow me to make a partial payment for partial services rendered?

  4. #49
    TBlax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Gloucestershire
    Posts
    626
    Thank Post
    115
    Thanked 48 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    28
    Let's not be hasty, fellow EduGeekers. Think about it, this will cure our frustrations of seeing people not being able to type in the Queen's English properly and scare all the chavs from typing out words incorrectly now, such as 'coming' - you get the idea. Effective, nice work DC! DC Comical more like.

    I'll be opting out, too bad I'm 99.9% likely to be labelled a pervert because of it but I don't pay for my internet access to have a Whiney Shiney-Forehead Pillock come along and say "Sorry young man, I must block you from seeing this photo gallery of the national art gallery museum because it displays a naked statue of a man with his winkle showing while holding his child in his arms. Good day to you." and, like the majority of the country, we're all mature and educated enough to deal with this problem ourselves and actually educate our children on how to use technology/the internet (luckily I have no children, that I know of, yet. Phew!) - so why not instead support the parents who are not all clued up on e-safety/the internet/technology and teach them simple methods of how to protect their kids, such as knowing their passwords or checking internet history, and deal with the parents who simply don't give a hoot.

    I don't condone child abuse or anything like that, that's not why I'm angry. I'm angry because they've automatically jumped on the "BLAME THE INTERNET/TECHNOLOGY!" bandwagon, like they do every single time, and are penalising the entire country for it.
    Last edited by TBlax; 22nd July 2013 at 11:17 AM.

  5. #50

    broc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,046
    Thank Post
    104
    Thanked 401 Times in 265 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    Filtering is a battle we are losing; education is the answer as many have said.

    Years ago I can remember an irate Humanities teacher coming to complain that one of her students had searched on Google images and had found a photo of a near nude lady. When I asked her what the student had searched for she said 'british actresses'...... my reply then was shall we block 'british' or 'actresses' ?

  6. #51

    Ephelyon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cheshire, England
    Posts
    1,480
    Thank Post
    233
    Thanked 283 Times in 164 Posts
    Rep Power
    134
    Cameron's answer would seem to be "block British"...

  7. #52

    tmcd35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    5,263
    Thank Post
    772
    Thanked 806 Times in 672 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by plexer View Post
    Will Google pull out of the UK?

    Does Cameron really think that child abuse images are easily found with a google search?

    If it was that easy I'm sure Google would have already fixed it but the answer is that no it's not.

    Ben
    I thought something similar earlier.

    So google.co.uk is defaulted to uber strict safe search turned on. Fair enough, what happens when I go to google.com? Auto-redirect to google.co.uk based on originating IP? Fine, what if I use a VPN or transparent proxy? I'm guessing ISP's will be asked to block these then?

    I tell you it's like being at school

  8. #53
    mthomas08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,491
    Thank Post
    119
    Thanked 144 Times in 127 Posts
    Rep Power
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by mattx View Post
    http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076

    So after cutting their funding, the moron announces this !!
    You could not make it up.
    Thats right Dave, all pedos use google to search for their stuff. You idiot.
    To be a little bit fair I am not surprised by this, nor am I massively for or against.

    Problem is there are parents who simply don't care, I have met many of them. They know the dangers of the internet but their attitude is "If my kids access it I don't really care" and I wish I was joking on that quote as well......

    There are parents like my older sister who has it setup on all internet equipment in her house and monitors what her kids are doing including limiting Facebook access and knowing their passwords. Any sign of abuse then they lose it, prime example would be my nephew decided to use Youtube to access naked women and he lost access to that. Although on a funny note he did say "So what, means im straight", for a 13 year old it made me laugh.

    If parents took more responsibility then perhaps we wouldn't be in this situation to begin with?

    Only my view though.

  9. #54


    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,502
    Thank Post
    200
    Thanked 636 Times in 487 Posts
    Rep Power
    230
    On the upside, presumably that bastion of right wing journalism (ha!) "The Sun" will be blocked as it contains ... pornographic content!

    Expect "Barmy Swivel Eyed Loons Ban British Boobies" or similar headlines.

  10. #55
    mthomas08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,491
    Thank Post
    119
    Thanked 144 Times in 127 Posts
    Rep Power
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by pcstru View Post
    On the upside, presumably that bastion of right wing journalism (ha!) "The Sun" will be blocked as it contains ... pornographic content!

    Expect "Barmy Swivel Eyed Loons Ban British Boobies" or similar headlines.
    Oh some people will use the sad excuse that its "ART"!!!!!

  11. #56

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,800
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 582 Times in 503 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by plexer View Post
    Will Google pull out of the UK?

    Does Cameron really think that child abuse images are easily found with a google search?

    If it was that easy I'm sure Google would have already fixed it but the answer is that no it's not.

    Ben
    Given this and the tax issues it would not surprise me if Google (and others) decide it's not worth the time and effort. They can still participate in the UK market without a UK office of course. To my mind it's not useful to be driving technology companies away when we still have such big economic issues.

  12. #57
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    3,722
    Thank Post
    757
    Thanked 297 Times in 234 Posts
    Blog Entries
    60
    Rep Power
    244
    You know, I see why the gay marriage bill was delayed and passed when it was. Plenty of liberty-based smoke and mirrors to try sneak a Police State under our noses. "Look at us, we are British and all liberal and give our people choice! Now don't visit that website and stop looking at Wikileaks, we will be banning all diplomatic cables on news websites next week anyway. After our friends at GCHQ have finished monitoring everything coming in and out of the country of course."

  13. #58

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,800
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 582 Times in 503 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224

  14. Thanks to Geoff from:

    CAM (22nd July 2013)

  15. #59

    LosOjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    5,188
    Thank Post
    1,286
    Thanked 1,030 Times in 730 Posts
    Rep Power
    658
    Between this and the US's SOPA, we're fast heading for an Internet where the only type of website that will be allowed to exist (or at least be "risk-free" enough for anyone to bother) will be corporate websites. They're trying to turn the Internet in to a digital business card database.

    Of course, it'll never happen - there are already hacker groups planning to build an alternative, free Internet system but it certainly seems to be what various governments are aiming for.

    Remember people, this is not a democracy. You can vote when they tell you to vote. You can vote on what they tell you to vote on. You will swallow your medicine like a good citizen. They will do what they want and you won't argue. Now close your eyes and get back to work.

  16. #60

    X-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    8,037
    Thank Post
    509
    Thanked 1,601 Times in 1,131 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    701
    Quote Originally Posted by LosOjos View Post
    Now close your eyes and get back to work.
    XKCD #303 [Has XKCD transcended the need to be linked/posted? Is a simple comic number sufficient for the joke?]

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gloria is at it again
    By ayoward in forum Yorkshire & Humberside Grid for Learning (YHGfL)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 22nd November 2012, 11:14 AM
  2. [Pics] The Daily Mail is at it again...
    By Arthur in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27th January 2012, 03:16 PM
  3. America is at it again
    By glennda in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21st April 2011, 03:54 PM
  4. [Website] top Gear at it again - James May Crash!
    By rad in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th October 2009, 02:57 PM
  5. TES Forums: They're at it again!!
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 10th April 2008, 12:23 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •