+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 193
General Chat Thread, Cameron is at it again..... in General; Originally Posted by pcstru What does this "Posession of On-line Pornography" mean? Are my copies of Straw Dogs, Deliverance, Frenzy, ...
  1. #16

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,680
    Thank Post
    516
    Thanked 2,451 Times in 1,897 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    832
    Quote Originally Posted by pcstru View Post
    What does this "Posession of On-line Pornography" mean? Are my copies of Straw Dogs, Deliverance, Frenzy, Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia are likely to land me in Jail?
    It does raise a question doesn't it? Considering online video is nearly entirely 'streamed' type now, do you possess it by viewing it?

    Not to mention, depictions of things are a grey area. At what point does it transition from being 'art' to 'pornography'?

  2. #17

    sonofsanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    4,952
    Thank Post
    862
    Thanked 1,443 Times in 991 Posts
    Blog Entries
    47
    Rep Power
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    At what point does it transition from being 'art' to 'pornography'?
    To quote a US High Court judge - "I know [hardcore pornography] when I see it". And that's the problem with all these sweeping censorship rules.

  3. #18
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    4,114
    Thank Post
    826
    Thanked 357 Times in 281 Posts
    Blog Entries
    60
    Rep Power
    281
    It used to be that deleting unwanted images immediately would be sufficient defence that you weren't storing it. UNLESS you have the technical ability to undelete them (which renders anyone with tech skills unable to use such a defence if it was proved they were storing them in the recycle bin). Not sure what it is now with streaming but Police say people who accidentally stumble on an image won't be prosecuted, but anyone who exhibits a pattern of repeatedly viewing an image or dodgy sites will get picked up.

  4. #19

    X-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    9,093
    Thank Post
    592
    Thanked 1,953 Times in 1,351 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    814
    Quote Originally Posted by pcstru View Post
    What does this "Posession of On-line Pornography" mean? Are my copies of Straw Dogs, Deliverance, Frenzy, Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia are likely to land me in Jail?
    Yes, you dirty pervert. [/joke]

    Quote Originally Posted by CAM View Post
    but anyone who exhibits a pattern of repeatedly viewing an image or dodgy sites will get picked up.
    A little bit of Devil's here... But if they know about a dodgy site and leave it accessible, isn't that the same as condoning it?

  5. #20

    JJonas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Walsham, Norfolk
    Posts
    3,105
    Thank Post
    386
    Thanked 432 Times in 320 Posts
    Rep Power
    383
    What happens to photo storage sites like imgur or photobucket? do they go in the list because they have some adult material?

  6. #21

    Ephelyon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cheshire, England
    Posts
    1,661
    Thank Post
    288
    Thanked 318 Times in 192 Posts
    Rep Power
    141
    I suppose the "possess by viewing" argument might work if it's the type that caches and you haven't cleared your browser cache in a while...

  7. #22
    CAM
    CAM is offline

    CAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Burgh Heath, Surrey
    Posts
    4,114
    Thank Post
    826
    Thanked 357 Times in 281 Posts
    Blog Entries
    60
    Rep Power
    281
    If they go through a site's logs and see that someone accessed Image X once and left immediately then that entry can be discarded (reality stored somewhere for future "reference" no doubt) since they likely stumbled on it by accident. If someone visited Image X, hung around, then later came back to Image X and moved on to Image Y and Image Z then you have found someone exhibiting a habit of viewing said images. Of course, if courts really want to nail you for something and want to find a reason to ruin you then this all goes out the window.

    @JJonas: This is one reason such sites are blocked in schools because their content cannot be policed all the time.
    Last edited by CAM; 22nd July 2013 at 09:45 AM.

  8. #23
    speckytecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,505
    Thank Post
    3,389
    Thanked 258 Times in 211 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    110
    I had such high hopes of this Government and in particular Cameron as PM. Sadly though they have proven themselves of failing to listen to the people who have the real expertise - this filtering announcement being yet another prime example. Letting ministers foam off cluelessly at the mouth (Gove being the chief proponent) and are now firmly marked in history for their ability to waste money devising plans and policy's which are promptly scrapped or turned around. Such a wasted opportunity.

  9. #24

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    9,911
    Thank Post
    596
    Thanked 2,165 Times in 990 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    628
    I do get the impression that there is also a great deal of confusion at policy level between just what role ISP's and hosting companies provide. For instance they seem to blame ISP's (who most often just provide the connection) for content on hosting companies servers, regardless of where in the world they are and put pressure on providers to police content they have no control over.

  10. #25
    Peter_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    20
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by JJonas View Post
    What happens to photo storage sites like imgur or photobucket? do they go in the list because they have some adult material?
    If you go to websites like 'random imgur' there will be 1-2 adult images.

  11. #26

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,803
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 583 Times in 504 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224
    Looks like it might be a good time to get into the VPN business.

  12. #27
    Peter_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    20
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff View Post
    Looks like it might be a good time to get into the VPN business.
    I already use PIA as a firewall bypass in school. We use it for support applications or blocked websites that teachers need to access.

  13. #28

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    9,911
    Thank Post
    596
    Thanked 2,165 Times in 990 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    628
    And who gets to decide what gets blocked or not? This is a very slippy slope the govt has entered into.
    What about deviantart and other such sites? Will there be a centralised government controlled 'approved' and 'naughty' website list?
    I have a very bad feeling about this.

  14. #29


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,588
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 856 Times in 735 Posts
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Dos_Box View Post
    And who gets to decide what gets blocked or not? This is a very slippy slope the govt has entered into.
    What about deviantart and other such sites? Will there be a centralised government controlled 'approved' and 'naughty' website list?
    I have a very bad feeling about this.
    which ultimately turns the internet into tv with only regulated stations allowed to "broadcast"

  15. #30

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,803
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 583 Times in 504 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224
    Until the legal system moves at as fast as technology does technology will be impossible to regulate.

  16. Thanks to Geoff from:

    Ephelyon (22nd July 2013)

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gloria is at it again
    By ayoward in forum Yorkshire & Humberside Grid for Learning (YHGfL)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 22nd November 2012, 11:14 AM
  2. [Pics] The Daily Mail is at it again...
    By Arthur in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27th January 2012, 03:16 PM
  3. America is at it again
    By glennda in forum General Chat
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 21st April 2011, 03:54 PM
  4. [Website] top Gear at it again - James May Crash!
    By rad in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th October 2009, 02:57 PM
  5. TES Forums: They're at it again!!
    By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 10th April 2008, 12:23 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •